Circuit with potential difference across battery being zero?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a circuit involving two batteries with different electromotive forces (emfs) and the implications of their interaction, particularly when considering the potential difference across one of the batteries becoming zero. The subject area includes concepts from circuit theory and electrochemistry.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) in the context of changing emfs, questioning how the current affects the emf of the first battery over time. There is also discussion about the role of internal resistance and the conditions under which the potential difference could be zero.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants offering insights into the behavior of the circuit and the batteries involved. Some guidance has been provided regarding the limitations imposed by battery chemistry and internal resistance, but multiple interpretations of the scenario are being explored.

Contextual Notes

There are assumptions regarding the behavior of batteries under different conditions, particularly in relation to their chemistry and internal resistance. The original poster's question about achieving zero potential difference across a battery is central to the discussion.

zenterix
Messages
774
Reaction score
84
Homework Statement
Can one construct a circuit such that the potential difference across the terminals of a battery is zero?
Relevant Equations
The first circuit I thought about was something like the following
1708367087570.png


Using KVL we have ##\epsilon_1-\epsilon_2+iR=0##.

It seems that ##\epsilon_1,\epsilon_2##, and ##R## are given and the only variable is ##i##.

Thus, ##i=\frac{\epsilon_2-\epsilon_1}{R}## for the KVL equation to be true.

However, it seems like when we think about what happens to this circuit in time, ##\epsilon_1## seems to be a variable as well.

Suppose ##\epsilon_2>\epsilon_1##. Then current flows counterclockwise. It seems that this current would undo the chemical reactions inside of battery 1 and reduce its electromotive force.

The more ##\epsilon_1## decreases, the higher the current. Does this mean the reduction of ##\epsilon_1## speeds up as the process occurs?

How long would this happen for?

I imagine that zero is the lowest that ##\epsilon_1## can go, since when this happens battery 1 is acting like a short and ##i=\frac{\epsilon_2}{R}##.

Actually, the first circuit I thought of didn't have the resistor ##R## in it.

##R## can be thought of as an internal resistance of battery 1.

If this resistance were not there (and I guess this is not a realistic scenario), then my guess is that the emf of battery 1 would go to zero instantly and the flow of current would be, well, infinity.

But the resistance is there, and after ##\epsilon_1## goes to zero, ##R## represents the resistance of the current flowing through that battery. There is, however, a difference of potential across the resistor.

Since we are thinking of this resistance as actually being part of the battery, then it seems that what happens is that in the end, the difference of potential across battery 1 (including the resistance) actually stays the same at ##\epsilon_2##, but now the entire potential difference is across the resistor.

I'm not sure what to make of this last statement yet.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As I think you understand, the circuit will require a very stout coppr bar and a "perfact" battery would supply very large current. As you rightly suspect this will be limited by the reaction rates in the battery (modeled as an interrnal resistance of the battery)
 
hutchphd said:
As you rightly suspect this will be limited by the reaction rates in the battery (modeled as an interrnal resistance of the battery)
Would that not be a resistance inside the battery, not a short, which means non-zero potential difference across the battery terminals?
 
zenterix said:
Homework Statement: Can one construct a circuit such that the potential difference across the terminals of a battery is zero?
Relevant Equations: The first circuit I thought about was something like the following

Suppose ϵ2>ϵ1. Then current flows counterclockwise. It seems that this current would undo the chemical reactions inside of battery 1 and reduce its electromotive force.
I don't know why you think this will happen? This depends on the exact battery chemistry, but at least with rechargeable batteries, this will charge the battery with the lower electromotive force, and it will raise its emf until the emfs of the batteries are the same. If R is large enough, this won't set anything on fire.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K