Circuits: Mesh Analysis with Phasors

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a circuit analysis problem using mesh current analysis in the phasor domain. Participants are exploring the application of Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) to derive equations for the meshes in the circuit.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of a current source in a mesh and whether mesh currents can be equated directly. There is confusion regarding the treatment of AC circuits compared to DC circuits. Some participants suggest alternative methods such as converting the current supply into a Thevenin equivalent to simplify the analysis.

Discussion Status

Some participants have shared their approaches to writing mesh equations and have confirmed the correctness of their methods. There is an ongoing exploration of different interpretations of the mesh analysis, with some participants expressing uncertainty about their results and seeking validation.

Contextual Notes

One participant mentions a time constraint due to an upcoming midterm, indicating a sense of urgency in understanding the material. There are references to specific values and results obtained, but no consensus has been reached on the best approach to the problem.

Saladsamurai
Messages
3,009
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement



I am supposed to use mesh current analysis using the following circuit diagram which is in the phasor domain:

Doc-3_13_114_26PM-page-1.jpg



Homework Equations


KVL


The Attempt at a Solution


Let's number these meshes from left to right 1,2,3. Here is what confuses me:
If take a look at the 3rd mesh, wouldn't we just have the equation:

-(8 - 4j)*I2 + (8 - 4j)*I3 = 0

So I would naturally conclude that I2 and I3 are equal and opposite.

But I3= - 2e-30j is known. But if I use this logic, I get the wrong answer. I really suck at mesh, but when we had regular DC circuits, if there was a current source in a mesh, then we would just equate the mesh current to the source current. Is this different for AC? Or is my mistake somewhere else?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the third mesh there will be an unknown voltage across the current supply, so no, you can't conclude that I2 and I3 are equal.

All the "usual" techniques work for complex impedances.

For this circuit I would be tempted to convert the current supply and its parallel impedance into its Thevenin equivalent (a simple enough operation), thus reducing the number of meshes by one and leaving only KVL equations to deal with.
 
I see. Would it be just as correct to write out the mesh equations for the first two meshes, the second of which would have an I3 in it that is given by I3=2e-30º*j? I did it this way and got the correct answer, but I want to make sure it was not by luck.

Thanks gneill :smile:
 
Sure, I don't see why not. If there happened to be other components in the third mesh that were not in common with the other i2 mesh (such as another resistor in series with the current supply), then it would be problematical.
 
Hello all!

Sorry to bring up this thread again (I can see it was from mid March). I am quite lucky that I found this on Google (gotta love Google :-p) but I am actually studying this exact problem since it was assigned on one of our homeworks and I do not know how to solve the KVL equations derived from the Mesh Analysis...can someone please help walk me through this?? I am actually quite desperate right now as I have a midterm on this material on Wednesday...any help would be much appreciated...I attached a picture of where I am having trouble (refer to the red boxed in part of the KVL equations).

http://www.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/th.f98e70477c.jpg
 
Your equations look okay. Your results are only a bit iffy with respect to accuracy, most likely due to some rounding that's taken place during the process of solving. Carry more significant figures up to the last step.

I get |I2| = 0.968A, angle 78.32 degrees.
 
Last edited:
Hey Gneill,

Thanks. The picture I attached is actually a solutions guide written by the professor. I actually ended up figuring out the solution and I agree his answer is slightly off from what I got.

I ended up getting I2 = .9677 < 78.2766 degrees. I agree, the differences are probably due to rounding.
 
skye2388 said:
Hey Gneill,

Thanks. The picture I attached is actually a solutions guide written by the professor. I actually ended up figuring out the solution and I agree his answer is slightly off from what I got.

I ended up getting I2 = .9677 < 78.2766 degrees. I agree, the differences are probably due to rounding.

Funny, I have a midterm in this class on Wednesday too :smile: Not by any chance NU?
 
Saladsamurai,

Yes, actually, I thought you might have been a NU student when I found this thread on google. Pretty ironic.

Maybe we could get together to go over some last minute stuff? I'll be on campus all day today (until like 10 p.m.). Let me know if you want to meet up...

email: KL22388@gmail.com or Liu.yet@husky.neu.edu
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
2K