Circular polarizer followed by a linear analyser

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the behavior of circularly polarized light when passing through a linear analyzer. It is established that the intensity of the output does not depend on the analyzer's axis due to the nature of circular polarization. The intensity calculations confirm that the original light intensity (I0) is halved after passing through the first polarizer, resulting in I0/2, and subsequently halved again by the linear analyzer, leading to a final intensity of I0/4. The output is confirmed to be linearly polarized light, with an emphasis on specifying the orientation of polarization.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of circular polarization and its properties
  • Knowledge of linear polarization and analyzers
  • Familiarity with intensity calculations in optics
  • Basic principles of electromagnetic waves
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical derivation of intensity changes in polarized light
  • Explore the applications of circular and linear polarization in optical devices
  • Learn about the behavior of light through multiple polarizers
  • Investigate the role of polarization in photography and imaging technologies
USEFUL FOR

Optics students, physicists, photographers, and anyone interested in the principles of light polarization and its practical applications.

Kaguro
Messages
221
Reaction score
57
Homework Statement
A beam of unpolarised light of intensity I0 falls on a linear polariser. Then this is incident on a quarter wave plate inclined at 45 degrees to the axis of the polariser. This produces circularly polarized light. Then if it is incident on an analyser inclined perpendicular to the first polariser,then what is the polarization state and intensity of the light leaving the analyser?
Relevant Equations
Nothing.
I think that the intensity of output of circularly polarised light falling on an analyser should not depend upon the axis of analyser. Because it is circularly polarized. It keeps rotating.

So, the output should be linearly polarised. The amplitude of E field in the direction of analyser is a cosine function of time. So the intensity should be average value of this, and hence is 1/2 times the circularly polarised light.

So original light I0, after falling on 1st polariser it becomes I0/2. Circular polarisation doesn't alter intensity. And finally another 1/2. So final intensity is I0/4.

Is all the above correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sounds correct to me. When stating that the output of the analyzer is linearly polarized light, it would probably be best to state the orientation of the polarization (even if it seems obvious to you).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Kaguro
Got it!

Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
4K