Cis or Trans Isomer: John's Question Answered

  • Thread starter Thread starter jaumzaum
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the classification of isomers as cis or trans, specifically in the context of a compound presented by John. John initially believed the compound was cis based on the positioning of ligands, but Wikipedia states it is trans, considering the backbone chain ligands. The consensus among participants is that while cis/trans nomenclature applies to simple molecules like but-2-ene, more complex molecules should utilize E/Z notation for clarity and unambiguity in isomer classification.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cis/trans isomerism
  • Familiarity with E/Z notation
  • Basic knowledge of organic chemistry and molecular structure
  • Experience with interpreting ligand positioning in chemical compounds
NEXT STEPS
  • Research E/Z notation in organic chemistry
  • Study examples of complex isomers and their classifications
  • Explore the significance of ligand positioning in stereochemistry
  • Review the differences between cis/trans and E/Z isomerism
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, organic chemists, and anyone studying stereochemistry and isomer classification will benefit from this discussion.

jaumzaum
Messages
433
Reaction score
33
The compound below is cis or trans?

Fluoromethylpentene.png


I learned that when the same ligants are at the same side of the bond, the isomerer is -cis, and when they are across, it is -trans. So I would say it is a cis compound

Wikipedia, though, sai it is trans. They consider the backbone chain ligants. If the backbonechain ligants are at the same side it's cis, otherside, trans.

So everything I learned was fake? I've seen nowhere else to treat cis/trans isomerer considering the backbone chain. What's the real answer?

Thanks
John
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
cis-trans works for simple molecules, when it is obvious with substituents are the important ones - say but-2-ene - two methyls and two hydrogens, so it is obvious that we mean methyls to be cis or trans. In the case of a molecule like the one you posted it becomes more difficult, as it is not necessarily clear which two substituents are the important ones. Here it is better to use E/Z notation, as it is unambiguous.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
22K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 138 ·
5
Replies
138
Views
11K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K