Clarification of electric potential difference

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the concept of electric potential difference, emphasizing that while potential difference can indeed be negative if the final potential is less than the initial, most texts use positive values for simplicity. The equation for electric field strength, ε = -ΔV/Δd, incorporates a negative sign to indicate the direction of the electric field relative to potential decrease. Participants noted that the choice of positive values in examples does not negate the possibility of negative potential differences, and consistency in modeling direction is crucial for accurate calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric potential and potential difference
  • Familiarity with the equation ε = -ΔV/Δd
  • Knowledge of electric field direction conventions
  • Basic principles of electromagnetism
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of negative potential differences in electric circuits
  • Study the relationship between electric field strength and potential difference in various contexts
  • Explore examples of electric potential in different physical scenarios
  • Examine textbooks and academic papers discussing electric potential and field direction conventions
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, electrical engineers, and educators seeking to deepen their understanding of electric potential difference and its applications in circuit analysis.

keroberous
Messages
15
Reaction score
1
I have some questions regarding the sign of potential difference. For example, given the literal definition as the difference in potential between two locations it should be possible for potential difference to be negative if the final potential is less than the initial, but while reading texts they always use positive values for potential difference, like "a proton moves through a potential difference of (some positive number)".

Or we defined potential difference to be ## \Delta V=-\varepsilon \Delta d ## which rearranges to ## \varepsilon =-\frac {\Delta V} {\Delta d} ## but I'm not sure what purpose the negative serves here because in all of the examples in the text they just use the equation for ## \varepsilon ## without the negative.

This part of potential difference is what I find the most confusing no matter how many times I read about it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
keroberous said:
they just use the equation for εε \varepsilon without the negative.
Could you quote some reference for this change of sign in action? Is it in more than one text?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dale
keroberous said:
it should be possible for potential difference to be negative if the final potential is less than the initial,
Definitely, yes.

keroberous said:
they always use positive values for potential difference, like "a proton moves through a potential difference of (some positive number)".
They just chose positive numbers for their examples. It doesn’t mean negative numbers are not possible

For the rest, a specific reference would be helpful, as @sophiecentaur suggested
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur
Here are two questions and I'm not sure how they are different.

242845

242846


242847

242848
 
For 6 they are ambiguous about the direction so you can assume any direction convention you like. May as well choose the one that makes it positive.

For 8 they are explicit about the direction so you just have to follow the math, which leads to a negative number in this case
 
In 8 the field points along the +ve x axis. Therefore, this is the direction of force on a positive particle. Since the force is in the direction of decreasing potential, E = -dV/dx, ie V falls, as x increases.
 
I think that in most practical situations, it doesn't matter which direction you model the current to run as long as your are consistent with that. Neg to Pos is correct of course but you often see it modeled the other way around. The main thing that matters is the magnitude of the potential as it determines amps, watts and ohms relationships.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
6K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K