On page 235 of srednicki (print) it says to plug a solution of the form $$ \textbf{$\Psi$} (x) = u(\textbf{p})e^{ipx} + v(\textbf{p})e^{-ipx}$$ into the dirac equation $$ (-i\gamma^{\mu} \partial_{\mu}+m)\textbf{$\Psi$}=0 $$(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

To get

$$(p_{\mu}\gamma^{\mu} + m)u(\textbf{p})e^{ipx} + (-p_{\mu}\gamma^{\mu} + m)v(\textbf{p})e^{-ipx} = 0 $$

I'm wondering what the reasoning for this term is (not wrt negative or positive but simply why p) $$p_{\mu}\gamma^{\mu}$$

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Clarification of spinor solutions in Srednicki

Loading...

Similar Threads for Clarification spinor solutions |
---|

A Spinor product in Peskin-Schroeder problem 5.3 |

A Positive and negative plane wave solutions of Dirac equation |

A Transformation of Dirac spinors |

I Spinors in higher dimensions |

A Probability density of dirac spinors |

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**