Clarifying Fradkin's Terminology on Quantum Numbers of Gauge Groups

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies Fradkin's terminology regarding quantum numbers in the context of gauge groups, specifically in Quantum Field Theory. The Wilson loop is identified as a charged operator that transforms non-trivially under gauge transformations, represented mathematically as W -> U(x) W U(x)^{-1}. It is confirmed that the Wilson loop operates under the fundamental representation, functioning as an N x N matrix for SU(N) gauge fields. The term "quantum numbers" refers to the charges associated with each generator of the gauge group, aligning with Fradkin's interpretation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Quantum Field Theory principles
  • Familiarity with gauge groups and their representations
  • Knowledge of Wilson loops and their properties
  • Basic concepts of SU(N) gauge fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical properties of Wilson loops in Quantum Field Theory
  • Explore gauge transformations and their implications on operators
  • Investigate the representation theory of gauge groups, particularly SU(N)
  • Examine the role of quantum numbers in particle physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in Quantum Field Theory, theoretical physicists working with gauge theories, and students seeking to deepen their understanding of gauge group representations and their applications.

paralleltransport
Messages
128
Reaction score
97
TL;DR
I'd like to clarify some terminology
Hi, I'd like to clarify the following terminology
(Fradkin, Quantum Field Theory an integrated approach)
1640455247572.png


"carry the quantum numbers of the representation of the gauge group":
Does the author basically mean that the wilson loop is a charged operator, in a sense that it transforms non-trivially under gauge transformation:
W -> U(x) W U(x)^{-1}

Furthermore, the fact that the wilson loop transforms under the fundamental representation means that it is just a N x N matrix for SU(N) gauge field and transforms according the conjugation law above?

Finally, the so called "quantum numbers" are then just the charges associated with each gauge group generator?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, I think that's what Fradkin means.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K