A Clarifying Fradkin's Terminology on Quantum Numbers of Gauge Groups

Click For Summary
The discussion seeks to clarify Fradkin's terminology regarding quantum numbers in gauge groups, specifically in the context of Wilson loops. It posits that the Wilson loop acts as a charged operator, transforming non-trivially under gauge transformations as described by the equation W -> U(x) W U(x)^{-1}. Additionally, it asserts that the transformation under the fundamental representation indicates that the Wilson loop is represented as an N x N matrix for SU(N) gauge fields. The term "quantum numbers" is interpreted as the charges linked to each gauge group generator. This interpretation aligns with Fradkin's intended meaning.
paralleltransport
Messages
128
Reaction score
97
TL;DR
I'd like to clarify some terminology
Hi, I'd like to clarify the following terminology
(Fradkin, Quantum Field Theory an integrated approach)
1640455247572.png


"carry the quantum numbers of the representation of the gauge group":
Does the author basically mean that the wilson loop is a charged operator, in a sense that it transforms non-trivially under gauge transformation:
W -> U(x) W U(x)^{-1}

Furthermore, the fact that the wilson loop transforms under the fundamental representation means that it is just a N x N matrix for SU(N) gauge field and transforms according the conjugation law above?

Finally, the so called "quantum numbers" are then just the charges associated with each gauge group generator?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, I think that's what Fradkin means.
 
Hi everyone, I am doing a final project on the title " fundamentals of neutrino physics". I wanted to raise some issues with neutrino which makes it the possible way to the physics beyond standard model. I am myself doing some research on these topics but at some points the math bugs me out. Anyway, i have some questions which answers themselves confounded me due to the complicated math. Some pf them are: 1. Why wouldn't there be a mirror image of a neutrino? Is it because they are...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
5K