Classical Mechanics - Pulleys System

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving a classical mechanics problem involving a system of pulleys with masses m_1 and m_2. The key equations derived include m_1 g - T = m_1 a and 2T - (m+m_2)g = (m+m_2) * (a/2), leading to the acceleration formula a = (2*(m + m_2 - 2 m_1))/(4 m_1 + m + m_2). Participants emphasize the importance of considering the pulleys' mass and rotational inertia, suggesting that tensions in the rope segments should be labeled as T1, T2, and T3 for accurate analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's second law of motion
  • Familiarity with rotational dynamics and inertia
  • Knowledge of tension in ropes and pulleys
  • Basic grasp of uniform disk modeling in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of rotational inertia in pulleys and its impact on tension
  • Learn about analyzing systems with multiple tensions in ropes
  • Explore the dynamics of mass-spring systems for comparative analysis
  • Investigate the effects of pulley radius on mechanical advantage
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on classical mechanics, as well as engineers and anyone interested in the dynamics of pulley systems.

TomAlso
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider the pulleys system in the picture. Assume both pulleys are frictionless. Assume the rope is massless and inextensible. Find the acceleration of the mass m_2


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I have solved the same problem with massless pulleys and I fail to see if their radii should be involved at all in the final result. So first notice that the acceleration of the mass m_2 is half of the acceleration of the mass m_1. On m_1 we have:

m_1 g - T = m_1 a

On m_2 we have:

2T - (m+m_2)g = (m+m_2) \cdot \frac{a}{2}

which solves for

a = \frac{2*(m + m_2 - 2 m_1)}{4 m_1 + m + m_2}

Anyone can offer any advice? In particular, how am I supposed to include the radius of the pulleys and the pulley that does not figure in the equation? Thank you!
 

Attachments

  • pulleys.jpg
    pulleys.jpg
    3.8 KB · Views: 599
Physics news on Phys.org
can you post the picture a different way? I can't see the attachment
 
The picture is just like http://img84.imageshack.us/i/carrucoleesameot5.jpg/" . Both pulleys have mass m and radius r. The mass labeled A is m_1 and B is m_2.

It says my attachment is pending approval, maybe that is the problem.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
TomAlso said:
Anyone can offer any advice? In particular, how am I supposed to include the radius of the pulleys and the pulley that does not figure in the equation?
(1) Since the pulleys have mass, you cannot assume that the tension in the rope is the same throughout. Treat each rope segment as having a different tension; Label the tensions T1, T2, and T3.
(2) Don't ignore the rotational inertia of the pulleys. I presume that you can model the pulleys as uniform disks. (You'll need to analyze both pulleys.)
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
37
Views
4K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
4K