Classical/Relativistic electron through a potential difference

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves an electron being accelerated through a potential difference of 2.044 MV, requiring calculations of kinetic energy, speed, and momentum using both classical and relativistic approaches.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss classical and relativistic equations for kinetic energy, momentum, and total energy. Questions arise regarding the validity of using certain equations in the relativistic context, particularly the treatment of potential energy.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered clarifications on the use of kinetic energy equations in both classical and relativistic frameworks. There is ongoing exploration of the implications of potential energy in the total energy calculations, with no explicit consensus reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of distinguishing between classical and relativistic treatments of kinetic energy and the potential confusion regarding the inclusion of potential energy in relativistic energy calculations.

Hakkinen
Messages
42
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An electron is accelerated through a potential difference of 2.044 MV. (a) find the kinetic energy, energy, speed (in c), and momentum classically. (b) Do the same relativistically.

Charge of the electron is ## e = 1.6 \times 10^-19 C ##

Rest mass is ## m_o = 9.1 \times 10^-31 kg ##

Rest energy is ## E_o = 0.511 MeV ##

Homework Equations




Classical equations
## u = c\sqrt{\frac{2eV}{E_o}} ##

## T = qV = \frac{1}{2}mv^2 ##

## p = mv ##

## E = T+U ## ?


Relativistic equations
## T = qV ##

## p = γm_0v ##

## E = T+E_0 = γm_0c^2##




The Attempt at a Solution



My only question with this problem is calculating the energy in each method.
Classically the electron's speed is calculated as approx 2.83c, so simply substituting in the known quantities you have:

## T \approx 2.06 MeV ##

## p \approx 1.6 \times 10^-11 \frac{eV}{c} ##

Now the total energy the electron possesses classically is just the sum of the potential and kinetic energies correct?

## E \approx 4.104 MeV ?? ##


Now relativistically:

Kinetic energy can be calculated with the same formula ## T = qV \approx 2.06 MeV ##

I solved for γ in ## E = T + E_0 ##

## γ = \frac{T}{E_0} +1 = \frac{E}{E_0} ##

then ## β = \sqrt{1-\frac{E_0^2}{E^2}} \approx 0.98c ##

Now with the velocity we can find relativistic momentum and energy

## p \approx 2.8 \times 10^-11 \frac{eV}{c} ##

Now the relativistic energy is ## E = T + E_0 ## , is potential energy not included in the total relativistic energy? If the reasoning in the classical case is right, the electron would have more energy than in the relativistic case as the potential energy of 2.044 MeV would be added to it.

Relativistic E without U ## E \approx 2.571 MeV ##
with U ## E \approx 4.61 MeV ##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hang on, I can't use ## T = qV ## in the relativistic case correct?
 
Classically, K = 1/2 mv^2, m = m0.
Relativistically, K = (m - m0)c2, m = γm0.

BTW the relativistic formula reduces to 1/2 m0v2 for v << c so it's really a general formula, as is of course required by the correspondence principle.

When a charged particle is propelled across a potential difference of V volts its K increases by qV. So 1 eV = K.E. gained by running an electron over a potential of 1V. Again, true classically and relativistically.

Just never assume K = 1/2 mv2 relativistically, even when you use the relativistic mass for m.
 
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: Wrichik Basu
Thanks for the reply, I can't believe I didn't see think to use the relativistic KINETIC ENERGY equation for KE. :rolleyes: I am quite sure I have the correct solutions now.

From ## T = qV = γ(E_0 - 1) ## I solved for gamma ## γ = \frac{qV}{E_0} + 1 ##

γ is about 5 so from there it was easy to correct the solutions and check that the relativistic KE formula gives approximately the same result as ## T = qV ##
 
Obviously I meant ## T = E_0(γ - 1) ## :smile:
 
Hakkinen said:
Obviously I meant ## T = E_0(γ - 1) ## :smile:

Big 10-4! :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
448
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K