Classifying a 2nd Order PDE: Understanding the Significance of the Discriminant

  • Thread starter Thread starter Diophantus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pde
Diophantus
Messages
69
Reaction score
0
A quick question:

When classifying a 2nd order PDE as either Hyperbolic, Parabolic or Elliptic we look at whether the discriminant is either positive, zero or negative respectively. Right. What do we do if the discriminant depends on independent variables (or the dependent variable for that matter) such that its sign can vary? Eg D = x. Do we classify it for the different values of x?

Regards.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Diophantus said:
A quick question:

When classifying a 2nd order PDE as either Hyperbolic, Parabolic or Elliptic we look at whether the discriminant is either positive, zero or negative respectively. Right. What do we do if the discriminant depends on independent variables (or the dependent variable for that matter) such that its sign can vary? Eg D = x. Do we classify it for the different values of x?

Regards.

Yep, yep. Here's a quote:

"If the coefficients A, B, C are functions of x, y, and/or u (dep. variable), the equation may change from one classification to another at various points in the domain".
 
And, in fact, there are entire books written on "Hyperbolic-Elliptic" equations, "Parabolic-Elliptic" equations, etc.
 
Thread 'Direction Fields and Isoclines'
I sketched the isoclines for $$ m=-1,0,1,2 $$. Since both $$ \frac{dy}{dx} $$ and $$ D_{y} \frac{dy}{dx} $$ are continuous on the square region R defined by $$ -4\leq x \leq 4, -4 \leq y \leq 4 $$ the existence and uniqueness theorem guarantees that if we pick a point in the interior that lies on an isocline there will be a unique differentiable function (solution) passing through that point. I understand that a solution exists but I unsure how to actually sketch it. For example, consider a...
Back
Top