Classifying Groups: Finite, Discrete, Continuous

  • Thread starter Thread starter Herr Malus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Groups
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around classifying groups based on specific criteria: finite, infinite discrete, finite-dimensional continuous, and infinite-dimensional continuous. The original poster seeks clarification on terminology and examples related to these classifications.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the definitions of discrete and continuous in the context of group theory and topology. Questions arise regarding the meaning of finite versus infinite dimensionality and the relevance of group order in classification. There is also a discussion about the connection between groups and manifolds, particularly in relation to Lie groups.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the definitions and implications of the terms involved. Some have provided examples of groups for classification, while others are questioning the appropriateness of these examples and the underlying assumptions about dimensions and topology.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted complexity in the terminology, as participants discuss the intersection of group theory with topology and vector spaces. The original poster's assignment appears to impose specific classifications that may not align with all participants' understanding of the terms.

Herr Malus
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
I have a question regarding terminology here. The assignment is somewhat as follows: "If you think any of the following is a group, classify it along the following lines: finite, infinite discrete, finite-dimensional continuous, infinite-dimensional continuous."

The definition of finite is obvious, but I haven't been able to find much of anything on the other three. Anyone have any good examples, or could at least point me in the correct direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This involves more than just group theory. Discrete is a topology term. The group of integers under addition is discrete in the usual topology. And if you are talking about dimension that only applies to vector spaces. And I'm guessing 'continous' means you are talking about manifolds. Do you have at least a rough idea what these mean?
 
If discrete is a reference to the discrete metric for a discrete topology, then yes. So in that case I assume we want a group of isolated elements. In differentiating between finite dimensional and infinite dimensional, are we just looking for the order of the group? I.e. the number n such that g^n=e, where e is the identity element of the group? Finally, my knowledge of manifolds comes from a G.R. course, so would I be looking for some sort of connection to the Lie groups there?
 
Herr Malus said:
If discrete is a reference to the discrete metric for a discrete topology, then yes. So in that case I assume we want a group of isolated elements. In differentiating between finite dimensional and infinite dimensional, are we just looking for the order of the group? I.e. the number n such that g^n=e, where e is the identity element of the group? Finally, my knowledge of manifolds comes from a G.R. course, so would I be looking for some sort of connection to the Lie groups there?

Dimension has to mean dimension as a vector space or manifold. Not as a group. What kind of groups are you trying to classify?
 
Last edited:
Examples of the types of groups we're looking at are:
-"The set of Mobius transformations in the complex plane", where I assume the operation is composition.
-"The set {1,2,3,...,p-1} under multiplication modulo p, where p is a prime number."
 
Ok, what do you think about those two?
 
Well, the first is in the complex plane, C, so I'd assume dimension is 2. For the second, I think I actually want order (so I picked a bad example, my apologies), in which case it seems that the order is p-1.
 
Herr Malus said:
Well, the first is in the complex plane, C, so I'd assume dimension is 2. For the second, I think I actually want order (so I picked a bad example, my apologies), in which case it seems that the order is p-1.

The mobius transformations form a Lie group. So it's a continuous group. The dimension of the group is going to be the dimension of the Lie group manifold, not the dimension of C. A mobius transformation (az+b)/(cz+d) is specified by the parameters a, b, c and d. So you can certainly say it's finite dimensional. And sure, the second one is finite.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K