Automorphism Group of Radical of Finite Group

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that a finite group \( G \) is a subgroup of the automorphism group \( Aut(R(G)) \) when \( R(G) \) is simple and non-commutative. The participant outlines the definitions of \( R(G) \), \( E(G) \), and \( F(G) \), emphasizing the relationship between the center \( C_G(R(G)) \) and \( R(G) \). Through a series of logical deductions based on the Fundamental Lemma of Finite Group Theory, it is established that \( C_G(R(G)) = e \), leading to the conclusion that \( G \) is indeed a subgroup of \( Aut(R(G)) \).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of group theory concepts, specifically automorphism groups.
  • Familiarity with the definitions of the radical \( R(G) \), Fitting subgroup \( F(G) \), and Layer \( E(G) \).
  • Knowledge of the Fundamental Lemma of Finite Group Theory.
  • Concept of quasisimple groups and their properties.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of automorphism groups in finite group theory.
  • Research the Fundamental Lemma of Finite Group Theory for deeper insights.
  • Explore the implications of simple groups and their automorphisms.
  • Learn about the structure and significance of Fitting subgroups in group theory.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in group theory, graduate students studying algebra, and researchers focusing on the properties of finite groups and their automorphisms.

A.Magnus
Messages
138
Reaction score
0
I am working on a problem on automorphism group of radical of finite group like this one:
Assume that ##R(G)## is simple and not commutative, show that ##G## is a subgroup of ##Aut(R(G)).##
Here are what I know and what I don't know:

##Aut(R(G))## is an automorphism group, whose elements consist of isomorphic mappings from ##R(G)## to itself. For visualization purpose, I envision the following example, where ##g \in G, r \in R(G)##:

## \begin{align} (\phi_g) \in Aut(R(G)), \quad \phi_g &: R(G) \to R(G), \\
&: r \mapsto r^g \\
&: r \mapsto grg^{-1} \end{align}##
Please correct me if I was wrong. But after this, I am stuck on how to prove that ##G## is subgroup of ##Aut(R(G)),## for to me it is like relating apple to orange. Perhaps this is because I failed to understand what the radical of finite group ##R(G)## stands for. For your info, in the class note the definition of ##R(G)## is a long and winding chain that goes like these:

(a) ##R(G) := E(G)F(G); ##
(b) Where ##F(G)## is defined to be the (complex) product of all subgroups ##O_p(G)## with ##p## a prime number, this group ##F(G)## is called the Fitting subgroup of ##G;##
(c) And ##E(G)## is defined to be the subgroup of ##G## generated by all components of ##G,## this group ##E(G)## is called the Layer of ##G##. And then another chain of definitions: A subnormal subgroup of ##G## is called a component of ##G## if it is quasisimple; the group ##G## is called quasisimple if ##G′ = G## and ##G/Z(G)## is simple.​

I think these are too long to be useful in solving this problem, what I am looking for is a working definition, or the salient property of ##R(G)## to solve this problem. I would therefore appreciate any help or hints in solving this problem. Thanks for your time and help.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I received a generous help from a member of Math Stack Exchange "mesel" here, many many thanks to "mesel" for his deep analysis! And here is the line-by-line analysis as I understood it. Any misunderstanding that I bring in, though, will completely be mine.

(1) From the Fundamental Lemma of Finite Group Theory, we have ##C_G(R(G)) \subseteq R(G)##, and from that ##C_G(R(G)) \leq R(G)## easily follows. Since ##C_G(R(G))## is normal, therefore it is the normal subgroup of ##R(G)##.

(2) But the question states that ##R(G)## is simple, meaning ##C_G(R(G))## is either ##R(G)## itself or ##e##.

(3) If ##R(G) = C_G(R(G))##, then ##R(G)## must be abelian which violates the premise given by the problem, therefore ##C_G(R(G)) = e##.

(4) Notice that ##C_G(R(G)) = \{g \in G \mid gr = rg, \forall r \in R(G) \}##, implying that

##\begin{align}

gr &= rg \\

g &= rgr^{-1} \\

&= e. \\

\end{align}##​

(5) Let ##\phi## be a homomorphism from ##G## to ##Aut(R(G))##, where the automorphism is a conjugation:

##\begin{align}

\phi &: G \to \underbrace{(R(G) \to R(G))}_{Aut(R(G)} \\

&: \underbrace {g}_{= \ e} \mapsto (r \mapsto \underbrace {rgr^{-1}}_{= \ e}) \qquad \qquad \forall r \in R(G), \\

\end{align}##​

which implies that ##\phi## is monomorphism.

(6) Because of the injective homomorphism above, ##G \cong \phi (G)##, and since ##\phi(G) \leq Aut(R(G))##, therefore we conclude that ##G## is subgroup of ##Aut(R(G))## as required. ##\blacksquare##
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
1K