Closed curve and orthogonal curvilinear coordinate system

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the construction of an orthogonal curvilinear coordinate system based on closed curves, specifically focusing on the equation of a closed path defined by x^8/A^8 + y^8/B^8 = k and its generalization to hyper-ellipses. Participants explore how to derive transformations similar to those in polar coordinates while maintaining orthogonality in the coordinate system.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant introduces the concept of using closed curves, such as those defined by x^8/A^8 + y^8/B^8 = 1, to create an orthogonal curvilinear coordinate system.
  • Another participant questions whether the curves should be parametrized by k, suggesting a family of curves instead of a single curve.
  • There is a proposal to set up a system of partial differential equations to find the required transformations, although it is noted that solving these equations may not be straightforward.
  • A later reply discusses finding tangent and perpendicular vectors to the curve at a given point, emphasizing the implicit nature of the function.
  • Participants debate the correct identification of parallel and perpendicular vectors in relation to the curve.
  • One participant references the concept of orthogonal trajectories from differential equations, suggesting a relationship between the parameters A, B, and k in the context of the curves.
  • Another participant seeks a parametric representation that maintains the orthogonality condition similar to polar coordinates.
  • There is a clarification that A and B are constants, and their values can change based on the parameter a, but they must remain positive.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the specifics of the transformations and the identification of vectors related to the curves. There is no consensus on the exact form of the parametric representation or the system of equations needed to establish the orthogonal curvilinear coordinate system.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the complexity of deriving the necessary transformations and the potential interdependencies between the parameters A, B, and k, which remain unresolved.

traianus
Messages
80
Reaction score
0
Hello, I have a "simple" problem for you guys. I am not expert in math and so try to be simple.

I explain the problem by starting with one example. The polar coordinate system has the following main property: with two parameters, rho and theta, each point is described as the intersection of a circle and a straight line. These two curves are orthogonal and so the curvilinear coordinate system is orthogonal.

Another example is if we use ellipses and hyperbolas: they are orthogonal. The transformation is simple:

x = c*cosh(a)* cos(b) (1)
y = c*sinh(a) * sin(b) (2)

where a>0, and 0<=b<=2pi

Now my question. Suppose that we like to use a set of curvilinear coordinate system (plane x-y only) which is orthogonal. Suppose that instead of ellipses or circles one of the type of curves is a closed path defined by (for example) the equation

x^8/A^8 + y^8/B^8 = 1

which is closed curve similar to an ellipse. Ho do I find a similar trasnformation (like equations (1) and (2)) with the property that the curvilinear coordinate system is also orthogonal? Please help me!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Suppose that instead of ellipses or circles one of the type of curves is a closed path defined by (for example) the equation

x^8/A^8 + y^8/B^8 = 1
Did you mean the family of curves (parametrized by k > 0)

x^8/A^8 + y^8/B^8 = k

where A and B are fixed constants?


Ho do I find a similar trasnformation (like equations (1) and (2)) with the property that the curvilinear coordinate system is also orthogonal?
In the obvious way! :smile: Just look at what you want: you want functions of two variables a and b such that:

(1) The derivative WRT a is parallel to x^8/A^8 + y^8/B^8 = k
(2) The derivative WRT b is perpendicular to x^8/A^8 + y^8/B^8 = k

So you should be able to set up a system of partial differential equations. I guess it might not be very easy to solve, though.
 
Thank you. Can you show the system of partial differential equations that solves the problem? Actually in my case I like to have the coordinate system of the "hyper-ellipse"

x^(2n)/A^(2n) + y^(2n)/B^(2n) = k

where n is a positive integer.
 
If C(k) is the loop defined by:

x^8 / A^8 + y^8 / B^8 = k

and (p, q) is a point on C(k)

then can you find a tangent vector to C(k) at (p, q)? What about a vector perpendicular to C(k) at (p, q)?
 
It is an implicit function. So I think that the tangent has equation

7*p^7/A^8*(x-p) + 7*q^7/B^8*(y-q) = 0 (1)

from (1) it follows that the vector perpendicular to the curve is

Vperp= q^7/B^8 * i - p^7/A^8*j (2)

where i,j are the unit vectors. The vector parallel to the curve is then

Vpar = p^7/A^8*i+ q^7/B^8*j (3)

Let me see if I get your point. Curvilinear coordinates means that there is a transformation of the type

x = f(a,b) (4)

y = g(a,b) (5)

Now I have to obtain the system. Please correct if am wrong. If I am not, can you write the system of equations?
 
Your work is off. I think you just switched which is perpendicular and which is parallel.

You're right that it's an implicit equation: when you differentiate, you should get:

[tex] \frac{8 p^7}{A^8} \, dx + \frac{8 q^7}{B^8} \, dy = 0[/tex]

is the equation for motion along your loop at the point (p, q).


Let me see if I get your point. Curvilinear coordinates means that there is a transformation of the type

x = f(a,b) (4)

y = g(a,b) (5)
Yep.

Since you wanted one of your parameters to go around the loop, that means when you partially differentiate, the result should be the tangent vector! i.e.

[itex]\frac{\partial}{\partial a} \langle f(a, b), g(a, b) \rangle[/itex] = the tangent vector at <f(a, b), g(a, b)>

and a similar condition for the other direction!
 
Finding "orthogonal trajectories" used to be a standard problem in ordinary d.e.s. If a family of curves is given by f(x,y)= c, then
[tex]\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}+ \frac{\partial f}{\partial y}y'= 0[/tex]
so
[tex]y'= -\frac{\frac\partial f}{\partial x}}{\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}}[/tex]

The "orthogonal trajectories" must satisfy the differential equation
[tex]y'= \frac{\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}}{\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}}[/tex]


In the case that [tex]\frac{x^{2n}}{A^{2n}}+ \frac{y^{2n}}{B^{2n}}= k[/tex] (you still haven't answered the question as to whether A and B are fixed constants while k determines the member of the family- actually, I suspect that there are some relations between A, B, k), assuming that A, B are constant while k varies over the family, the orthogonal trajectories satisfy
[tex]y'= \frac{A^{2n}}{B^{2n}}\frac{y^{2n-1}}{x^{2n-1}}[/tex]
 
Thank you for you answers. A, B are constant, as n. So, what is the parameteric representation

y = f(a,b)

x = g(a,b)

in which when a = constant I have the curve

[tex]\frac{x^{2n}}{A^{2n}}+ \frac{y^{2n}}{B^{2n}}= k[/tex]

and when b = constant I have a family of curves orthogonal to it (like it happens for polar coordinates in which the lines are perpendicular to the circles)?
 
A and B must be positive. If I move from a curve fto another one, A and B can change, but they can be function ONLY of the parameter a. Also, they have to be positive.
 
  • #10
Nobody knwos?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K