1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Closed form of an infinitely nested radical.

  1. Dec 9, 2012 #1

    Pzi

    User Avatar

    Hello.

    Does anybody happen to know a closed form of this infinitely nested radical?
    http://imageshack.us/a/img268/6544/radicals.jpg [Broken]
    By any chance, maybe you even saw it somewhere?

    I haven't had too much success so far. At the moment I am so desperate that I'm even willing to try and guess the solution, then prove that it is equal to my nested radical. For any real positive x the limit indeed exists (various criteria can be found for that very reason). Numerical limits can be seen in the plot:
    http://imageshack.us/a/img842/876/plote.jpg [Broken]

    Also here is a convergence plot:
    http://img100.imageshack.us/img100/64/convergence.jpg [Broken]
    It is made in a sense that using double precision variables computer sees no difference between a_{k}(x) and a_{k+1}(x) which in turn means that ~16 decimal digits have already been found. In fact it's so nasty that a{6}(50000) - a{5}(50000) < 10^(-24).
    Notably the bigger my argument, the faster it converges (although I'm not sure what useful conclusions I can draw from that).

    Pretty much the only known elegant cases: a(1) is equal to golden ratio, a(4)=2.

    What would you suggest?


    Best regards,
    Pranas.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 6, 2017
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 9, 2012 #2

    I like Serena

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    Hi Pzi! :smile:

    You can write:
    $$\sqrt{x^1 + \sqrt{x^2 + ...}} = \sqrt x \cdot \sqrt{x^0 + \sqrt{x^1 + ...}} = \sqrt x \cdot a(x)$$

    If you substitute that in the expression for a(x), you get an equation that you can solve.......
     
  4. Dec 9, 2012 #3

    Pzi

    User Avatar

    Not really.
    Your idea requires powers like 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32... whereas we actually have 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6...
     
  5. Dec 11, 2012 #4

    Pzi

    User Avatar

    Still looking for any insightful ideas!
     
  6. Dec 12, 2012 #5

    haruspex

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    2016 Award

    I get a good fit to 1.19 x1/4
     
  7. Dec 12, 2012 #6

    Dick

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    You say you are desperate for a solution. Do you have any reason to believe there is an analytically exact solution?
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Closed form of an infinitely nested radical.
  1. Nested Radicals (Replies: 7)

Loading...