Closure under * for subset H of commutative elements in set S

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves demonstrating that a subset H of a set S, defined as the set of elements that commute with every element of S under an associative binary operation *, is closed under that operation. The context is within abstract algebra, specifically focusing on properties of operations and subsets.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need to show that for any elements a and b in H, the product a*b also belongs to H. Questions arise regarding the implications of associativity and commutativity in this context, as well as the necessity of proving the closure property for all elements in S.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring the logical steps needed to establish closure. Some guidance has been provided regarding the structure of the proof, emphasizing the importance of justifying each step clearly. There is recognition of the need to differentiate between elements in H and those in S.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of the associative property of the operation * and its relationship to the commutative nature of the elements in H. There is a focus on ensuring that the proof adheres to the definitions and properties relevant to the problem.

bennyska
Messages
110
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


suppose that * is an associative binary operation on a set S. Let H = {a elementof S | a*x = x*a forall x elementof S}. Show that H is closed under *.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


i don't really know where to begin. I know i need to show forall a,b elementof H, a*b elementof H. i know * is associative, and H is the subset of all commutive elements of S. (the book says, "we think of H as consisting of all elements of S that commute with every element is S." same thing?) where do i go from here? what does * being associative have to do with commutive elements?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let [itex]a, b \in H[/itex]. To show closure, you want to prove that [itex]a*b \in H[/itex]. In other words, you want to show that for all [itex]x \in S[/itex], [itex](a*b)*x = x*(a*b)[/itex]. Make sense?
 
so could i say:
since * is associative, then for all a, b, x in S, (a*b)*x = a*(b*x), and since H is the set of all commutative elements, then (a*b)*x = a*(b*x) = x*(b*a) = x*(a*b), and H is closed under S. does that make sense, or did i just reiterate what you said? ( i guess i want to reiterate what you said with more detail.)
 
Yeah, essentially, but you need to pay more attention to the details. The statement only holds for a, b in H, not in S generally, but it needs to hold for all x in S. Also, just do one step at a time so it's clear that each step is justified. When you wrote a*(b*x)=x*(b*a), how do you know x and a can switch places like that? You are using neither commutativity nor associativity alone, so it's not immediately apparent to the reader that the step is correct.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K