Clustered Std Errs vs Unclustered

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheBestMilke
  • Start date Start date
TheBestMilke
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Greetings,

I recently ran two regressions, one clustering around the states from my data and the other without clustering. Both have fixed time effects. I've noticed that the standard errors for my main coefficients under observation are much larger than the standard errors from my unclustered regression. Is there a reason for this difference (the clustered std errors are about twice as big) and could it be an effect of serial correlation?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TheBestMilke said:
Greetings,

I recently ran two regressions, one clustering around the states from my data and the other without clustering. Both have fixed time effects. I've noticed that the standard errors for my main coefficients under observation are much larger than the standard errors from my unclustered regression. Is there a reason for this difference (the clustered std errors are about twice as big) and could it be an effect of serial correlation?

You should have another go at explaining your question. "Clustering" is general idea, but it isn't clear what specific clustering technique you used. Your statement indicates that the data may have a time stamp to it, but not much else.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Back
Top