CNO Cycle

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the CNO cycle, specifically whether it refers to the Carbon-Nitrogen-Oxygen cycle or the Carbon-Neon-Oxygen cycle. Participants explore the fusion processes that occur in stars involving these elements, addressing confusion regarding the roles of Carbon, Nitrogen, Oxygen, and Neon in these reactions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants clarify that CNO stands for Carbon-Nitrogen-Oxygen, although there are processes within the CNO cycle that can produce Neon.
  • There is a suggestion that the CNO cycle is catalytic, producing alpha particles as byproducts rather than simply consuming protons.
  • One participant mentions that the CNO cycle can occur in hydrogen-core stars and distinguishes it from the carbon-burning process that produces Neon.
  • Another participant explains that during the CNO phase, Carbon can produce Nitrogen through the formation of unstable Oxygen-15, which decays into Nitrogen via beta decay.
  • There are discussions on specific fusion reactions, including the possibility of Carbon fusing with protons and the energy dynamics involved in various reactions, including the formation of different isotopes.
  • One participant elaborates on the complexity of the CNO cycle, detailing multiple reactions and energy considerations, emphasizing that the cycle does not easily produce Neon and primarily cycles between Carbon, Nitrogen, and Oxygen.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the specifics of the CNO cycle and its processes, with no consensus reached on the exact nature of the fusion reactions involved or the role of Neon. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the interpretations of the CNO cycle and its implications.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the CNO cycle involves complex branching reactions and energy considerations that are not fully addressed in some resources. There are also mentions of specific isotopes and their behaviors in reactions, indicating a nuanced understanding of the processes involved.

KingGambit
Messages
54
Reaction score
46
Dear PF Forum,

What is CNO Cycle?
Is it Carbon Nitrogen Oxygen cycle or Carbon Neon Oxygen?

Veritasium CNO cycle

In this video, Derek Muller says that Carbon fuses into Neon, and Neon fuses into Oxygen.
I can't imagine that Derek makes an error here. But for myself, I get a little confused, too.
If Carbon is bombarded by Alpha particle, then Carbon should become Oxygen, right. And Oxygen + Alpha particle = Neon?

So, can I ask what fusion happens in a star start from Carbon,
Is it Carbon, Nitrogen, Oxygen
- if this is, then what element that Carbon fuses to, to become Nitrogen, it can't be Alpha particle, right.
Is it Carbon, Neon (ehm), Oxygen??
- Well, I'm no chemist much less an astrophysics, but I do memorize the eleventh or tweleve elements in the periodic table to understand the sequence, Carbon, Nitrogen, Oxygen, Fluor, Neon, Sodium, ?? 🤕 .

Thank you very much for any help here 🙏
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
It is not a simple additive reaction. All the protons are not necessarily consumed by the process. It is catalytic, meaning there is an alpha particle produced as a byproduct.

Wiki has an easy primer on the process.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: KingGambit
KingGambit said:
Dear PF Forum,

What is CNO Cycle?
Is it Carbon Nitrogen Oxygen cycle or Carbon Neon Oxygen?
CNO clearly stands for carbon-nitrogen-oxygen. In some cycles it can produce neon see CNO cycle (CNO IV). You also have the carbon-burning process (not to be confused with CNO) that produces neon by colliding two carbon atoms. The CNO cycle can take place even in hydrogen-core stars.
KingGambit said:
Veritasium CNO cycle

In this video, Derek Muller says that Carbon fuses into Neon, and Neon fuses into Oxygen.
I can't imagine that Derek makes an error here. But for myself, I get a little confused, too.
If Carbon is bombarded by Alpha particle, then Carbon should become Oxygen, right. And Oxygen + Alpha particle = Neon?
What Derek seems to be talking about it is the remaining core of the star. When he talks about neon, it refers to the process which is called the neon-burning process (which comes after the carbon-burning). It is followed by the oxygen-burning process.
KingGambit said:
So, can I ask what fusion happens in a star start from Carbon,
Is it Carbon, Nitrogen, Oxygen
- if this is, then what element that Carbon fuses to, to become Nitrogen, it can't be Alpha particle, right.
In order to produce nitrogen during the CNO phase, the star produces some oxygen-15 which is unstable and decays into nitrogen by beta decay.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Astronuc, Bandersnatch and KingGambit
KingGambit said:
Dear PF Forum,

What is CNO Cycle?
Is it Carbon Nitrogen Oxygen cycle or Carbon Neon Oxygen?

In this video, Derek Muller says that Carbon fuses into Neon, and Neon fuses into Oxygen.
I can't imagine that Derek makes an error here. But for myself, I get a little confused, too.
If Carbon is bombarded by Alpha particle, then Carbon should become Oxygen, right. And Oxygen + Alpha particle = Neon?
Unless proton/s are expelled on reaction with alpha particle!
KingGambit said:
So, can I ask what fusion happens in a star start from Carbon,
Is it Carbon, Nitrogen, Oxygen
- if this is, then what element that Carbon fuses to, to become Nitrogen, it can't be Alpha particle, right.
One option of fusion cycle. That is fusion with protium. (Note that deuterium and tritium are rare in stars, deuterium because it rapidly fuses with protium).
While wikipedia CNO cycle article is nice, it does not address the branching well, by treating CNO as separate cycles.
Have a look at https://www-nds.iaea.org/relnsd/vcharthtml/VChartHTML.html. Hover the mouse cursor at an isotope, and it shows a number of ways to break up the nucleus.
Look at 13N. It shows:
...
Qα=-9495 keV (and more digits I´m truncating out)
...
Sp=1943 keV
This means that there are the following "possible" reactions:
13N=12C+p-1943 keV
13N=9B+α-9495 keV
Note that S is (almost) always expressed as positive, it is the energy lost knocking out a nucleon or gained adding it (9B is one of the few exceptions - it immediately fissions to p+2α). Q may be positive or negative, if it is negative then the decay cannot happen unless energy is added.
So we see that reaction
12C+p=13N+γ
is possible.
Reaction
13N=9B+α=3α+p
will happen only if a huge amount of energy is somehow supplied. I marked it in italics that it is the ruled out alternative.
Continuing the chain...
13N will emit positron or capture electron to promptly convert to 13C. I'll imply these beta decays for all radioactive isotopes in the chain/cycle.
13C+p=14N+γ+7550 keV
14N=10B+α-11612 keV
next:
14N+p=15O+γ+7296 keV
15O=11C+α-10218 keV
But:
15N+p=16O+γ+12127 keV
16O=12C+α-7161 keV
summing up to:
15N+p=12C+α+4966 keV
This I bolded because in contrast to previous 3 reaction pairs, this time adding proton to get 16O releases more energy than is needed to take α out and therefore this last reaction is possible.
A general rule is that when the same reagents of nuclear reaction can form either one nucleus and a gamma ray OR two nuclei then forming two nuclei happens much more often even though it releases less energy. This is why it is named STRONG interaction!
The bolded interaction closes one cycle. The reaction forming 16O is the minor branch.
What next?
16O+p=17F+γ+600 keV
17F=13N+α-5818 keV
next
17O+p=18F+γ+5607 keV
18F=14N+α-4415 keV
17O+p=14N+α+1192 keV
This closes cycle, again! And it returns to the middle of the previous cycle! If you heat any of the 15O, 16O or 17O with hydrogen, the oxygen is mainly destroyed, forming helium and carbon, or first helium and nitrogen (and then converting carbon to nitrogen and back - but NOT converting them to boron).
But the second cycle again has the minor exit forming 18F. What next?
18O+p=19F+γ+7993 keV
19F=15N+α-4013 keV
18O+p=15N+α+3980 keV
Third return of the loop, and also to the middle of the first cycle! All stable O isotopes are destroyed on heating with hydrogen.
Next:
19F+p=20Ne+γ+12843 keV
20Ne=16O+α-4729 keV
19F+p=16O+α+8114 keV
fourth return of the loop
the minor exit
20Ne+p=21Na+γ+2431 keV
21Na=17F+α-6561 keV
next
21Ne+p=22Na+γ+6738 keV
22Na=18F+α-8479 keV
next
22Ne+p=23Na+γ+8794 keV
23Na=19F+α-10467 keV
next
23Na+p=24Mg+γ+11692 keV
24Mg=20Ne+α-9316 keV
23Na+p=20Ne+α+2676 keV
And this is a new loop! It does NOT loop back to the previous loops - heating Ne and Na with hydrogen can convert them to each other, but can NOT convert them to F, and then back to C, N and O. This is why there is a CNO cycle that ends after F.
However, it is very hard to remove CNO from CNO cycle. In order to convert CNO into Ne, the reaction has to take the less likely branch 4 times in a row. Which is why CNO mostly cycle between each other, and don´t produce much Ne.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Drakkith and KingGambit

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
6K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K