CNO fusion using particle accelerator?

Click For Summary
The CNO cycle is a fusion process in stars that converts protons into helium-4, releasing significant energy primarily as gamma rays. The discussion explores the feasibility of replicating this cycle in a laboratory setting using a particle accelerator to bombard a high-density target of carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen isotopes with protons. It notes that protons would need to be accelerated to approximately 3.2 MeV to overcome Coulomb repulsion, a task deemed achievable. However, past attempts to achieve fusion through particle accelerators have shown that the energy lost to Coulomb scattering far exceeds the energy produced from fusion. The idea of recycling non-colliding particles within the accelerator is proposed but raises questions about its effectiveness in achieving significant fusion energy.
jcap
Messages
166
Reaction score
12
The CNO cycle (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CNO_cycle) is a catalytic fusion reaction that produces energy in stars larger than the sun. It converts four protons into a helium-4 nucleus using a cycle of carbon, nitrogen and oxygen isotopes as catalysts and releases 26.7 MeV of energy mostly in the form of gamma rays.

Could one make this cycle work in the laboratory by bombarding a high-density target made of these isotopes with protons accelerated in a particle accelerator?

If a carbon nucleus has a radius of about ##2.7\times10^{-15}## m then one would require protons to be accelerated to about ##3.2## MeV in order to overcome the Coulomb repulsion. I guess this can easily be achieved. If the energy of the gamma rays was captured perhaps one could produce fusion energy by this method?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Many people have thought about trying to produce fusion with particle accelerators. Suppose I fire high-energy nuclei at a target (say I fire deuterium nuclei at a deuterium target). A very few of the nuclei will hit a target nucleus "head-on", overcome the Coulomb barrier, and fuse. The vast majority of the incoming nuclei, however, will lose their energy through Coulomb scattering off the nuclei and electrons in the target. The amount of fusion energy produced in this way is far less than the energy needed to accelerate the incoming nuclei. It just doesn't work.
 
Could one insert the target into the accelerator ring so that any beam particles that don't collide with target nuclei are collected and sent round the accelerator again until they do collide?
 
They still collide, they just don't collide with a nucleus head on. They collide with a nucleus with a non-zero impact parameter and are deflected or they collide with electrons and lose energy.
 
What type of energy is actually stored inside an atom? When an atom is split—such as in a nuclear explosion—it releases enormous energy, much of it in the form of gamma-ray electromagnetic radiation. Given this, is it correct to say that the energy stored in the atom is fundamentally electromagnetic (EM) energy? If not, how should we properly understand the nature of the energy that binds the nucleus and is released during fission?

Similar threads

High School CNO Cycle
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K