Coefficient Matching for different series

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the application of coefficient matching in different series representations, specifically focusing on power series, Legendre series, and spherical harmonics. It highlights that while coefficient matching works well for polynomials, issues arise when attempting to apply it to Legendre polynomials and spherical harmonics due to their linear independence. The contradiction encountered, where different values for coefficients are obtained, indicates a misunderstanding of how coefficient matching applies outside polynomial contexts. Additionally, it is confirmed that both Legendre polynomials and spherical harmonics are linearly independent and can be shown to be orthogonal under regular Sturm-Liouville problems. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the nature of the functions involved when applying coefficient matching.
CGandC
Messages
326
Reaction score
34

Homework Statement


Hello,
I have a general question regarding to coefficient matching when spanning some function, say , f(x) as a linear combination of some other basis functions belonging to real Hilbert space.

Homework Equations


- Knowledge of power series, polynomials, Legenedre polynomials, Spherical harmonics..

The Attempt at a Solution


Say I express f(x) as a power series, and f(x) = 1+2x+3x^2 , so, I can match the coefficients as in the following picture:
upload_2018-1-8_21-53-11.png

( no problem there, since the series is a polynomial)

Ok..but what If I now have some function g(x) and I express it as Legendre series (in the x domain: -1 to 1 ) , and I know that
upload_2018-1-8_21-55-17.png
, where the p's are Legendre polynomials. :
upload_2018-1-8_22-24-16.png


My question is , can I apply coefficient matching here? ( as in the next picture: )
upload_2018-1-8_21-58-19.png


Also, consider the next case:
suppose I have :
upload_2018-1-8_22-10-7.png
, where the Y's are spherical harmonics... and I decide to show 'h' as a series such as this:
upload_2018-1-8_22-11-2.png


then, matching coefficients I get:
upload_2018-1-8_22-11-32.png


Eventually, I get a contradiction , on the one hand : A=2 , on the other hand A=3 , so my understanding of coefficient matching in this part is clearly wrong ( because it aint a series representing polynomials? )... why?

Note:
I was taught that coefficient matching works in polynomials and since power series is a polynomial, but Legendre series and the last series is different... yet, I was not told that coefficient matching does not work in other cases, that makes me troubled as I'm unsure if coefficient matching applies only to polynomials.

Much thanks in advance for helpers.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-1-8_21-52-57.png
    upload_2018-1-8_21-52-57.png
    2.4 KB · Views: 598
  • upload_2018-1-8_21-53-11.png
    upload_2018-1-8_21-53-11.png
    2.3 KB · Views: 452
  • upload_2018-1-8_21-55-3.png
    upload_2018-1-8_21-55-3.png
    626 bytes · Views: 572
  • upload_2018-1-8_21-55-17.png
    upload_2018-1-8_21-55-17.png
    651 bytes · Views: 425
  • upload_2018-1-8_21-56-52.png
    upload_2018-1-8_21-56-52.png
    1.6 KB · Views: 558
  • upload_2018-1-8_21-58-9.png
    upload_2018-1-8_21-58-9.png
    779 bytes · Views: 612
  • upload_2018-1-8_21-58-19.png
    upload_2018-1-8_21-58-19.png
    773 bytes · Views: 438
  • upload_2018-1-8_22-7-54.png
    upload_2018-1-8_22-7-54.png
    2.6 KB · Views: 584
  • upload_2018-1-8_22-9-53.png
    upload_2018-1-8_22-9-53.png
    791 bytes · Views: 583
  • upload_2018-1-8_22-9-55.png
    upload_2018-1-8_22-9-55.png
    791 bytes · Views: 577
  • upload_2018-1-8_22-10-7.png
    upload_2018-1-8_22-10-7.png
    791 bytes · Views: 408
  • upload_2018-1-8_22-11-2.png
    upload_2018-1-8_22-11-2.png
    2.5 KB · Views: 431
  • upload_2018-1-8_22-11-32.png
    upload_2018-1-8_22-11-32.png
    914 bytes · Views: 405
  • upload_2018-1-8_22-22-25.png
    upload_2018-1-8_22-22-25.png
    1.3 KB · Views: 610
  • upload_2018-1-8_22-23-24.png
    upload_2018-1-8_22-23-24.png
    1.9 KB · Views: 603
  • upload_2018-1-8_22-24-16.png
    upload_2018-1-8_22-24-16.png
    1.5 KB · Views: 433
Physics news on Phys.org
CGandC said:
My question is , can I apply coefficient matching here?
Yes, the Legendre polynomials are linearly independent.

CGandC said:
Eventually, I get a contradiction , on the one hand : A=2 , on the other hand A=3 , so my understanding of coefficient matching in this part is clearly wrong ( because it aint a series representing polynomials? )... why?
You have different ##A## for each combination of ##\ell## and ##m##. The spherical harmonics are linearly independent.
 
  • Like
Likes CGandC
Orodruin said:
Yes, the Legendre polynomials are linearly independent.You have different ##A## for each combination of ##\ell## and ##m##. The spherical harmonics are linearly independent.

How do I show that Legendre polynomials/Spherical harmonics are linearly independent?
( perhaps using Wronskian? or perhaps because knowing each set is orthogonal to it self, then the set of functions is automatically linearly independent)
 
They are both eigenfunctions of Sturm-Liouville problems.
 
  • Like
Likes CGandC
Orodruin said:
They are both eigenfunctions of Sturm-Liouville problems.

I understand... I have another question:
If I have eigenfunctions that arise from S-L problems, I understand that they are linearly independent... but are they also always orthogonal to each other?
 
CGandC said:
I understand... I have another question:
If I have eigenfunctions that arise from S-L problems, I understand that they are linearly independent... but are they also always orthogonal to each other?
Yes, assuming that it is a regular SL-problem and you use the appropriate inner product.
 
  • Like
Likes CGandC
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
868
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K