MHB Coefficient of friction and effects of

Casio1
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
Not a question from a college course or anything like that, but one of interest to me:)

You take a car tyre made of polyester and rubber, the treads are cut to about 7mm deep, the roads coefficient of friction are normally about 0.7 in conjunction with contact of the tyre, if the weight is independant of the static friction between the tyre and road surface, how could a calculation be performed to work out how much wear takes place when a tyre rolls along the road surface?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If the tyre were really "rolling", there would be NO friction and so no wear. In order that there be friction, there would have to be some slippage and the friction and wear would depend on the amount of slippage which is not given here.
 
I think it would also depend on the material of the tire itself - its "cohesiveness". I think the formula would be immensely complicated. That is, I think a theoretical analysis would be quite complicated. An a posteriori experimental result would naturally be much easier.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top