Coefficient of friction on an inclined plane

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves determining the coefficient of kinetic friction between a block and a ramp on an inclined plane, using minimal measurements. The original poster seeks to create an equation based on the angle of incline, distance traveled, and time taken, without measuring mass.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between forces acting on the block, including gravitational and frictional forces, and how to express these in terms of mass. There are attempts to simplify expressions for the normal force and frictional force, while questioning the assumptions made about the forces involved.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring various interpretations of the forces at play. Some guidance has been offered regarding the expression of the normal force and its relationship to the gravitational force. There is recognition of the need to cancel mass from the equations, but no consensus has been reached on the final formulation.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the constraint of not measuring mass and the implications this has on deriving the coefficient of friction. There is also mention of the need to express forces in terms of known quantities, which adds complexity to the problem.

Will M
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Coefficient of friction on an inclined plane

Homework Statement


The problem I have is to determine the coefficient of kinetic friction between two wooden objects, a block and a ramp, using the fewest measurements possible. The initial velocity will be 0. I can measure the angle of incline, the distance traveled along the ramp, the time taken, but should not have to measure mass. I do not currently have any values, but should create an equation. Can I do this, and if so, am I on the right track?

Homework Equations


Fnet = ma
Ff = μFN
Δd = V1Δt + ½aΔt²

The Attempt at a Solution


ncd2jm.png


Fnet = ma

Ff - Fg║ = ma

Ff - Fg sin θ = ma

Ff - mg sin θ = ma

Ff = 2Δd/Δt² - g sin θ

μFN = 2Δd/Δt² - g sin θ

μFg┴ = 2Δd/Δt² - g sin θ

μFg cos θ = 2Δd/Δt² - g sin θ

μ = [(2Δd/Δt²) - g sin θ] / Fg cos θ

μ = [(2Δd/Δt²) - g sin θ] / mg cos θ

Note:The substitution of acceleration for 2Δd/Δt² in the 5th line is from the equation Δd = V1Δt + ½aΔt² where V1Δt evaluates to 0.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Shouldn't it be Fg - Ff = ma since Fg is the leading force causing the acceleration and Ff is the retarding force?

Also, you can express Fn in simpler terms to cancel out the masses.
 
How would I express FN in simpler terms?
 
What component of the weight is opposing the normal force? You can express all the Fg components in terms of m, and then cancel out m.
 
Ok, I realize that since μ is a constant, it shouldn't be mass dependent. I also know that since there is no acceleration in the perpendicular direction, the normal force is opposed by, and has a magnitude equal to, the perpendicular component of the force of gravity. I've expanded this to mg cos θ but I don't have another m to cancel the mass out with.
Could you please point out the line where I've gone wrong, and what I should have done? Or am I just missing something that I should be doing after the last line?

Sorry for being clueless. :smile:
 
You know that the block has a mass m. Therefore, your applied force is mgsinX. You can figure out what the normal force is equal to in terms of mg with your free body diagram and then use this to show what the frictional force is equal to.

You also know that Fnet = ma.

Thus you can cancel mass and substitute a kinematics equation to find the distance.
 
There is no applied force, do you mean net force? Also, I'm looking for the coefficient of friction, not the force of friction, otherwise I would have stopped at the line Ff = 2Δd/Δt² - g sin θ
 
Right, there is no applied force. I meant the force that is causing the acceleration, namely the F_g (parallel) force.

You know that [tex]F_g_/_/=mgsin\theta[/tex]

You know that [tex]F_f=\mu F_n[/tex]

But what is Fn? How can you express this in terms of m?
 
I could express it as [tex]F_N=mgcos\theta[/tex] right?

Then I could substitute it for [tex]F_N[/tex] in [tex]F_f=\mu F_n[/tex]

After rearranging to solve for μ, it would be [tex]\mu=F_f/mgcos\theta[/tex]

Substituting the fifth line of my original solution for [tex]F_f[/tex] would give me

[tex]\mu = \left(2\Delta d/\Delta t^{2} - g sin \theta\right)/mgcos\theta[/tex]

Which is where I get confused. I can't think of any other way to express [tex]F_N[/tex]
 
  • #10
[tex]mgcos\theta - F_f = ma[/tex]

[tex]mgcos\theta - \mu F_n = ma[/tex]

[tex]mgcos\theta - \mu mgsin\theta=ma[/tex]

Can you solve it now?
 
  • #11
Ah, I think I see it now. Thanks! :biggrin:

Would this be correct:

[tex]mgsin\theta - \mu mgcos\theta=ma[/tex]

[tex]mg(sin\theta - \mu cos\theta)=ma[/tex]

[tex]g(sin\theta - \mu cos\theta)=a[/tex]

[tex]\mu g +g(sin\theta - cos\theta)=a[/tex]

[tex]\mu +sin\theta - cos\theta=a/g[/tex]

[tex]\mu=a/g -sin\theta + cos\theta[/tex]

[tex]\mu=2\Delta d/\Delta t^{2}g -sin\theta + cos\theta[/tex]
 
  • #12
Your algebra is off starting with the fourth step.
 
  • #13
Yeah, I caught that when I checked it over, but thanks, because you've been a real help! :biggrin:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
871
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K