Coefficient of Static Friction on a Turntable

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the coefficient of static friction between a metal washer and both metal and rubber surfaces using a turntable experiment. The experiment involved varying the distance from the center of the turntable and recording the RPM at which the washers flew off. Key findings indicate that the average coefficient of static friction for rubber surfaces is highest at shorter radii, while for metal surfaces, it peaks at larger radii. The participant seeks clarification on the observed trends in the coefficients, particularly the lower values at medium distances.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of static friction and its coefficients
  • Familiarity with rotational dynamics and RPM measurements
  • Basic knowledge of experimental data analysis
  • Experience with lab equipment, specifically turntables
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the relationship between radius and centrifugal force in rotational systems
  • Study the effects of surface material on friction coefficients
  • Learn about the physics of static versus kinetic friction
  • Explore data analysis techniques for interpreting experimental results
USEFUL FOR

Students in technical dynamics, physics enthusiasts, and anyone conducting experiments related to friction and rotational motion will benefit from this discussion.

jhawks8
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I'm doing a lab for my technical dynamics class and that lab is to determine the coefficient of static friction between a metal washer and both metal and rubber surfaces.

I did the experiment using 3 washers set at different distances from the center of the turntable as instructed, and recorded the RPM at which the washers of each distances flew off the turntable. My data is below:

Rubber Surface
r(m) |RPM |w(rad) |µ | AVG µ
0.03 |123 |12.88 |0.507|
0.03 |154 |16.13 | 0.796| 0.676
0.03 |147 |15.39 |0.724|

0.06 |100 |10.47 |0.671
0.06 |97 |10.16 |0.631 |0.607
0.06 |88 |9.22 |0.52

0.1 |71 |7.44 |0.564
0.1 |80 |8.38 |0.716 |0.647
0.1 |77 |8.06 |0.662

Metal Surface

r(m)|RPM |w(rad) |u...|AVG µ
0.06 |77 |8.06 |0.397
0.06 |67 |7.02 |0.301 |0.376
0.06 |80 |8.38 |0.43

0.08 |62 |6.49 |0.344
0.08 |62 |6.49 |0.344 |0.363
0.08 |67 |7.02 |0.402

0.1 |61 |6.39 |0.416
0.1 |61 |6.39 |0.416 |0.403
0.1 |58 |6.07 |0.376

What is not making sense to me is why the coefficient of static friction is the lowest when in the medium distances. Also, the largest coefficient for the metal surface is the largest radius, and the largest coefficient for the rubber surface is the shortest radius.

I need help understanding this, or if I'm doing something wrong and I don't know it. Any help is really appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry for the sloppy tables.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
30K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K