Coefficients of friction proportional?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between the coefficients of rolling friction and kinetic friction, particularly in the context of a wood sphere rolling down an incline versus a wood block sliding down an incline. Participants explore whether these coefficients are proportional and how surface area might influence the work done by friction.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions if the coefficients of rolling and kinetic friction are proportional, seeking to understand the impact of surface area on work done by friction.
  • Another participant cites the Mechanical Engineering Handbook, stating that rolling friction depends on the radius of the sphere and the materials in contact, suggesting that larger spheres typically have smaller friction coefficients, while kinetic friction is solely dependent on materials.
  • A participant clarifies the distinction between rolling friction and static friction, raising questions about the specific context of "rolling friction" in the discussion.
  • One participant provides energy equations for both the block and sphere, presenting data for coefficients of friction but questions the ability to establish proportionality with only two values.
  • A later reply emphasizes that with just two values, no conclusions about proportionality can be drawn.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between rolling and kinetic friction coefficients, with some arguing there is no specific correlation while others seek to explore potential connections. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the proportionality of the coefficients.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in their ability to draw conclusions about proportionality based on the number of data points available. The discussion also highlights dependencies on definitions and the specific conditions under which friction is analyzed.

zpatenaude37
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
If you were to calculate work done by rolling friction of a wood sphere rolling down an incline and compare it to work done by friction of a wood block sliding down an incline, are the values for the coefficient of rolling and kinetic friction somehow proportional to each other?

This is for a project and I want to be able to show whether or not the additional surface area of a block affects the work done by friction. I have calculated values for the coefficients of kinetic and rolling friction from the data I have that I got using video software but I don't think I can correlate the two.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi, according to the Mechanical Engineering Handbook i read a few weeks ago, rolling friction depends on the radius of sphere and materials in contact, i.e. larger sphere usually has smaller friction coefficient.
While kinetic friction is purely dependent on the materials in contact. For you idea of having additional surface area for a block simply will not affect the kinetic friction.

So i would say rolling friction and kinetic friction coefficient does not have a specific correlation.
 
zpatenaude37 said:
If you were to calculate work done by rolling friction of a wood sphere rolling down an incline and compare it to work done by friction of a wood block sliding down an incline, are the values for the coefficient of rolling and kinetic friction somehow proportional to each other?

This is for a project and I want to be able to show whether or not the additional surface area of a block affects the work done by friction. I have calculated values for the coefficients of kinetic and rolling friction from the data I have that I got using video software but I don't think I can correlate the two.
When you speak of "rolling friction", are you referring, for instance, to the force between a car tires and the road when the brakes are applied at the maximum short of causing a skid? Or are you referring to the retarding force from the tires as a car coasts to a stop with well-oiled bearings and no brakes? The former is that I would call "static friction". The latter is that I would call "rolling resistance".
 
Yes rolling resistance.
For example:
at the start of rolling down an incline the total energy in the system is
mgy
for a block the final is:
1/2mv^2
for a sphere is:
1/2mv^2 + 1/2Iw^2

initial energy - final energy = thermal energy = work done by friction = mu*n*d

For the sphere my data showed mu = .11
For a cylinder of the same material mu = .11
For the block sliding mu = 0.46

Is there any way to compare the block to the cylinder and sphere to say its proportional?
 
With just two values you cannot show anything about proportionality.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
11K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
10K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K