Why is rolling easier than sliding?

In summary: This statement is incorrect. Rolling does not involve any friction force. In real life, there may be some rolling resistance due to factors like air resistance and imperfections in the surface, but these are not related to the coefficients of static and kinetic friction. In fact, it is easier for a tire to roll than to slide, as the rolling motion does not require any force to maintain, while sliding requires a constant force to overcome kinetic friction.
  • #1
UNForces_885
11
2
I learned that rolling involves the coefficient of static friction unlike sliding that involves the coefficient of kinetic friction. It's known that the coefficient of static friction is always higher than the coefficient of kinetic friction. This should result in rolling to be more difficult than sliding as it involves higher frictional force, which is not the case in real life.
Could someone please help elaborate??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The static friction happens between wheel and surface.
Between wheel and axis there is dynamic friction.
 
  • #3
Without any friction, a cylinder on an incline will slide but not roll. Static friction does not dissipate energy; it converts translational energy of the center of mass to rotational energy about the CM. There is rolling friction (look it up) which dissipates some energy but not as much as kinetic friction.
 
  • Like
Likes Tazerfish, sysprog, phinds and 1 other person
  • #4
Consider, for instance, a wagon wheel. It is about one meter in diameter and has a hub with a hole in it which is about five centimeters in diameter. Inside the hole sits the axle about which the wheel rotates.

The drag from the rolling wheel relates to kinetic friction at the axle. The drag on a wheel with the brakes locked up relates to kinetic friction at the road. Static friction is not involved.

The reason that a wagon wheel rolls easily is due to mechanical advantage. (And grease). You have the same load on the wheel bearing (1/4 of the wagon weight) as there is on the road. So the force of kinetic friction is nominally the same. But with a 20 to 1 mechanical advantage, rolling is easier than sliding. Grease improves that further. And reduces wear.

It is worth noting that the coefficient of static friction is the maximum frictional force that can exist between two mating surfaces that are not yet slipping. Just because the surfaces are not yet slipping that doesn't mean that the force has to be that high. Two surfaces with no tangential force between them can succeed in not slipping just fine! Like a book sitting on a table.
 
  • Like
Likes sysprog, russ_watters and jrmichler
  • #5
UNForces_885 said:
I learned that rolling involves the coefficient of static friction unlike sliding that involves the coefficient of kinetic friction. It's known that the coefficient of static friction is always higher than the coefficient of kinetic friction. This should result in rolling to be more difficult than sliding as it involves higher frictional force, which is not the case in real life.
Could someone please help elaborate??

Rolling doesn't involve any friction to continue. Rolling continues through conservation of linear and angular momentum. Imagine a wheel rolling off a surface into space - it will keep rotating.

Static friction is necessary to initiate rolling from a surface (and to brake!). It's the static friction that provides the torque for angular acceleration. But, as the friction is static (no slipping), there is no displacement between the wheel and surface while they are in contact and no work done.

Also, if you slide a wheel along a rough surface, then kinetic friction will a) reduce the kinetic energy of the wheel and b) translate some of its linear motion to rotational motion. The wheel then reaches an equilibrium where it's rolling without slipping and friction is no longer required.
 
  • Like
Likes Tazerfish, sysprog, russ_watters and 2 others
  • #6
Thanks for your answers. But I am lost indeed in those details you mentioned. Let me rephrase the question.
Assume a single car tire on a horizontal surface in two situations not attached to anything:
1- It's rolling (µs is involved)
2- It's sliding (µk is involved)
since Fsmax=µsN (where Fsmax is the maximum static friction and µs is the coefficient of static friction), Fk=µkN (where Fk is the kinetic friction and µk is the coefficient of kinetic friction), and µs > µk, I can assume that the tire will experience higher frictional force while rolling than while sliding.
This conclusion is totally counterintuitive to me.

Additional Info:
Please put my question in context with the following quote of my physics teacher.
"If you lock your wheels driving down the road on dry concrete if they are sliding, or skidding, you will have less friction than if they are rolling. (µs > µk)
This is in theory the idea of antilock breaking systems (ABS) in cars; they cause intermittent lockage of breaks to keep the wheeling rolling intermittently to prevent sliding and thus provide higher friction force (stoppage force) using μs instead of μk."
 
  • #7
UNForces_885 said:
Thanks for your answers. But I am lost indeed in those details you mentioned. Let me rephrase the question.
Assume a single car tire on a horizontal surface in two situations not attached to anything:
1- It's rolling (µs is involved)

This is wrong. There is no friction involved in rolling. See post #5.
 
  • Like
Likes SilverSoldier
  • #8
UNForces_885 said:
since Fsmax=µsN (where Fsmax is the maximum static friction and µs is the coefficient of static friction), Fk=µkN (where Fk is the kinetic friction and µk is the coefficient of kinetic friction), and µs > µk, I can assume that the tire will experience higher frictional force while rolling than while sliding.
That conclusion is overstated. The tire can experience higher frictional force while rolling than sliding.$$F_\text{s} \leq F_\text{smax} = \mu_sN > \mu_kN = F_\text{k}$$The actual force of static friction can be either greater or less than that of kinetic friction.

Modern ABS systems do not actually achieve an increase in friction above locked-up skidding. But they do preserve some measure of control while braking with maximum pedal force. Hence their utility.

Edit: It seems that modern controllers are smarter than the ones I'd understood from yesteryear and can improve traction above kinetic.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes sysprog
  • #9
UNForces_885 said:
I can assume that the tire will experience higher frictional force while rolling than while sliding.
This conclusion is totally counterintuitive to me.

If you have a bicycle, you can try the following experiment:

1) Lock the brakes and try to push the bike along the ground. It's very difficult. It can take quite a force to get it moving at all. That is static friction.

2) Once it is moving, it's not so hard to keep it going. That's kinetic friction, which is less than static friction.

3) Release the brakes so that the wheels can roll. Now, as you push static friction gets the wheels rotating. But, as the bike moves there is almost no resistance. And, once the bike is moving at constant speed static friction no longer plays a part.

When talking about static friction it's imporant to distinguish case 1) from case 3)!
 
  • Like
Likes Tazerfish and sysprog
  • #10
UNForces_885 said:
...
Additional Info:
Please put my question in context with the following quote of my physics teacher.
"If you lock your wheels driving down the road on dry concrete if they are sliding, or skidding, you will have less friction than if they are rolling. (µs > µk)
This is in theory the idea of antilock breaking systems (ABS) in cars; they cause intermittent lockage of breaks to keep the wheeling rolling intermittently to prevent sliding and thus provide higher friction force (stoppage force) using μs instead of μk."
That explanation is correct, except that the ABS releases the brake pressure from the locked tire and immediately re-applies the brake.
Each time the tire stops rolling while the car is still moving, the ABS repeats those steps.

That achieves two important things: better deceleration and keeping steering (in case of front wheels).
What seems confusing to you?
 
  • Skeptical
  • Like
Likes sysprog and davenn
  • #11
PeroK said:
This is wrong. There is no friction involved in rolling. See post #5.
How then can you explain the following quote?
UNForces_885 said:
"If you lock your wheels driving down the road on dry concrete if they are sliding, or skidding, you will have less friction than if they are rolling. (µs > µk)
This is in theory the idea of antilock breaking systems (ABS) in cars; they cause intermittent lockage of breaks to keep the wheeling rolling intermittently to prevent sliding and thus provide higher friction force (stoppage force) using μs instead of μk."
 
  • #12
Lnewqban said:
That explanation is correct, except that the ABS releases the brake pressure from the locked tire and immediately re-applies the brake.
Each time the tire stops rolling while the car is still moving, the ABS repeats those steps.

That achieves two important things: better deceleration and keeping steering (in case of front wheels).
What seems confusing to you?
If the explanation is correct, it's a fact that the static friction of rolling wheels is higher than the kinetic friction of sliding wheels, which is not experienced when I roll or slide a wheel on its own as it's much easier to roll the wheel probably because less friction is involved.
 
  • #13
UNForces_885 said:
How then can you explain the following quote?

Braking is very different from rolling. The brakes induce the static friction to activate. Until the brakes are applied there is no friction (static or otherwise) involved in rolling - that's why it's so efficient and you can coast along without power for so long.

PS I didn't notice that you were talking about braking until the "additional info" in post #6.
 
  • Like
Likes sysprog
  • #14
UNForces_885 said:
If the explanation is correct, it's a fact that the static friction of rolling wheels is higher than the kinetic friction of sliding wheels, which is not experienced when I roll or slide a wheel on its own as it's much easier to roll the wheel probably because less friction is involved.
It's because you are not applying the brakes. Static friction (of tires on road) can be greater than kinetic friction (of tires on road) if you are applying the brakes very hard, just short of breaking loose and going into a skid.
 
  • #15
UNForces_885 said:
I learned that rolling involves the coefficient of static friction unlike sliding that involves the coefficient of kinetic friction. It's known that the coefficient of static friction is always higher than the coefficient of kinetic friction. This should result in rolling to be more difficult than sliding as it involves higher frictional force, which is not the case in real life.
The losses in rolling are determined by the coefficient of rolling resistance:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolling_resistance#Rolling_resistance_coefficient

The coefficient of static friction determines whether you get rolling or sliding, but has nothing to do with the efficiency of rolling.
 
  • #16
UNForces_885 said:
If the explanation is correct, it's a fact that the static friction of rolling wheels is higher than the kinetic friction of sliding wheels,...
That is a fact.

UNForces_885 said:
... which is not experienced when I roll or slide a wheel on its own as it's much easier to roll the wheel probably because less friction is involved.
That is an error of perception.
You cannot push a tire (bracing yourself on something solid) and make it roll if there is no friction at the contact patch: you need that resisting force to create the torque that will induce the tire rotation.

When you perceive that your tire easily rolls, what you have is a succession of contact patches that grip hard against the surface, one little area after the other.
When each little section of contact patch finishes its job, it is lifted and separated from the surface by the geometry of the wheel, while the following one is beginning to land and establishes new grip.
None of those little areas slide or skid under normal conditions of pure rolling.

For that reason, a car can happily roll forward while is cornering hard: the persistent and strong static friction of each little area of successive contact patches prevents the car from sliding out of the curve.
If the cornering force is strong enough to overwhelm the static friction, a slide starts (dynamic sideways friction) and does not stop unless some other condition changes, because its value is always smaller than the value of static friction.

Think of a rack and pinion mechanism: you have smooth rolling with tenacious grip (think huge static friction) between wheel and linear gear:
1584993462818.gif
 
Last edited:
  • #17
"There is no friction involved in rolling."

Maybe not once a wheel has already begun to roll on a perfectly level ideal frictionless track.

But certainly friction is necessary for rolling something uphill, even slightly uphill.
 
  • #18
zinq said:
"There is no friction involved in rolling."

Maybe not once a wheel has already begun to roll on a perfectly level ideal frictionless track.

But certainly friction is necessary for rolling something uphill, even slightly uphill.
This is wrong.

You can rotate a wheel uphill by any torque. The same way you can rotate a wheel that is not touching any surface.

The track does not need to be frictionless for there to be no friction.
 
  • #19
A bacon and egg breakfast 'involves' a pig and a chicken. Like sliding and rolling, their involvement isn't the same.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
  • #20
PeroK said:
This is wrong.

You can rotate a wheel uphill by any torque. The same way you can rotate a wheel that is not touching any surface.

The track does not need to be frictionless for there to be no friction.

The more details you introduce the more I get confused. :(
Does a rolling car wheel on its own experience more friction than the same wheel sliding? If yes, why is it easier to roll the wheel than to slide it? [Please keep the answer as simple as possible]
 
  • #21
UNForces_885 said:
The more details you introduce the more I get confused. :(
Does a rolling car wheel on its own experience more friction than the same wheel sliding? If yes, why is it easier to roll the wheel than to slide it? [Please keep the answer as simple as possible]
I would ignore this digression. Concentrate on rolling and braking.
 
  • #22
PeroK said:
I would ignore this digression. Concentrate on rolling and braking.
Could you please answer the question?
Does a rolling car wheel on its own experience more friction than the same wheel sliding? If yes, why is it easier to roll the wheel than to slide it? [Please keep the answer as simple as possible]
 
  • #23
UNForces_885 said:
Could you please answer the question?
Does a rolling car wheel on its own experience more friction than the same wheel sliding? If yes, why is it easier to roll the wheel than to slide it? [Please keep the answer as simple as possible]
What part of "friction is not involved in rolling" do you not understand?
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
  • #24
PeroK said:
What part of "friction is not involved in rolling" do you not understand?
Actually, rolling involves static friction. That's why I am confused.
2020-03-23_220656.jpg

Giancoli-Physics-Principles-with-Applications-7th (2014) Page 204
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK
  • #25
UNForces_885 said:
Actually, rolling involves static friction. That's why I am confused.
View attachment 259204
Giancoli-Physics-Principles-with-Applications-7th (2014) Page 204
Well, one of us is wrong!
 
  • #26
PeroK said:
Well, one of us is wrong!
Most probably, neither of you is wrong and I only misunderstand the whole concept that's why I asked for elaboration.
 
  • #27
UNForces_885 said:
Most probably, neither of you is wrong and I only misunderstand the whole concept that's why I asked for elaboration.
If I was you I would trust the guy that wrote the book! It's a bit of a problem if he is wrong, though.

Here's a question for you and Giancoli, though. If a rolling wheel reaches a big hole in the road, does it keep spinning? Or, because it no longer has static friction to keep it spinning, does it stop spinning? If so, what happened to conservation of angular momentum?

Or more pointedly, what force does it take to keep a spinning wheel spinning? By conservation of angular momentum, no force is required to keep it spinning; only to start it spinning, speed it up or slow it down.
 
  • #28
Possibly we should shift to a simpler situation.

A 1 kg book is sitting in the middle of a horizontal table. The coefficient of static friction between book and table is 0.2. What is the force of static friction between book and table?
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
  • #29
jbriggs444 said:
Possibly we should shift to a simpler situation.

A 1 kg book is sitting in the middle of a horizontal table. The coefficient of static friction between book and table is 0.2. What is the force of static friction between book and table?
My whole point was to address the confusion related to static and kinetic friction while a wheel is rolling or sliding thus my question;
Does a rolling car wheel on its own experience more friction than the same wheel sliding? If yes, why is it easier to roll the wheel than to slide it?
 
  • #30
UNForces_885 said:
My whole point was to address the confusion related to static and kinetic friction while a wheel is rolling or sliding thus my question;
Does a rolling car wheel on its own experience more friction than the same wheel sliding? If yes, why is it easier to roll the wheel than to slide it?
The fact that you ask this question suggests that you do not yet grasp the basics. So please answer my question.
 
  • #31
jbriggs444 said:
Possibly we should shift to a simpler situation.

A 1 kg book is sitting in the middle of a horizontal table. The coefficient of static friction between book and table is 0.2. What is the force of static friction between book and table?

Without applying any force on the book the force of static friction is zero N

Assuming that you apply some force on the book, the static friction increases with increasing the applied force until the maximum static friction is reached, beyond which the book will start moving.

Fsmax=µsN
In this case the force of normal equals to the weight of the book, thus
Fsmax=µsmg = (0.2)(1kg)(10m/s2)
The maximum static frictional force on the book is 2 N
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK
  • #32
UNForces_885 said:
If yes, why is it easier to roll the wheel than to slide it?
Because the rolling resistance is usually smaller than kinetic friction.
 
  • Like
Likes etotheipi, russ_watters and FactChecker
  • #33
Static friction is what stops a ball from just sliding down a slope, but it is not the force that must be overcome for the ball to roll. For a ball to roll, only the rolling friction must be overcome. That can be very low, much lower than either static or dynamic friction.
 
  • #34
UNForces_885 said:
Without applying any force on the book the force of static friction is zero N

Assuming that you apply some force on the book, the static friction increases with increasing the applied force until the maximum static friction is reached,
Good, so you know that the static friction force is equal to the applied force at the contact point and can be much less than the theoretical maximum available static friction. So when an object is rolling, what causes a force to be applied at the contact point?
 
  • #35
Consider the case of a cogged wheel rolling down a cogged straight rail, with the cog teeth meshing. Although the meshed cogs do not fit the definition of static friction, they can illustrate the essential concepts. It would be very hard for the wheel to slide down the rail without rolling; it might require breaking the cog teeth. That illustrates the concept of static friction. On the other hand, there is very little to stop the wheel from rolling down the rail. That illustrates the concept of rolling friction. In general, static friction is much greater than rolling friction.
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur and Lnewqban
<h2>1. Why is rolling easier than sliding?</h2><p>Rolling is easier than sliding because it involves less friction. When an object is rolling, only a small portion of its surface is in contact with the ground, resulting in less resistance and making it easier to move. In contrast, sliding involves the entire surface of the object being in contact with the ground, creating more friction and making it harder to move.</p><h2>2. Does the shape of an object affect its ability to roll or slide?</h2><p>Yes, the shape of an object can greatly affect its ability to roll or slide. Objects with round or curved surfaces, such as a ball or a wheel, are able to roll more easily because they have a smaller surface area in contact with the ground. On the other hand, objects with flat or uneven surfaces, such as a book or a shoe, are more likely to slide due to their larger surface area in contact with the ground.</p><h2>3. How does the surface material impact rolling and sliding?</h2><p>The surface material can greatly impact the ease of rolling and sliding. Smooth surfaces, such as ice or polished wood, have less friction and make it easier for an object to roll. Rough surfaces, such as carpet or gravel, have more friction and make it harder for an object to roll, causing it to slide instead.</p><h2>4. Can rolling and sliding be affected by external forces?</h2><p>Yes, external forces can affect the ease of rolling and sliding. For example, a strong wind blowing in the direction of an object's movement can make it easier to roll, while a strong wind blowing against the object's movement can make it harder to roll and cause it to slide.</p><h2>5. How does the weight of an object impact rolling and sliding?</h2><p>The weight of an object can also impact its ability to roll or slide. Heavier objects have more inertia, making it harder for them to start rolling or sliding. On the other hand, lighter objects have less inertia, making it easier for them to start rolling or sliding. However, once an object is in motion, its weight does not have a significant impact on its ability to continue rolling or sliding.</p>

1. Why is rolling easier than sliding?

Rolling is easier than sliding because it involves less friction. When an object is rolling, only a small portion of its surface is in contact with the ground, resulting in less resistance and making it easier to move. In contrast, sliding involves the entire surface of the object being in contact with the ground, creating more friction and making it harder to move.

2. Does the shape of an object affect its ability to roll or slide?

Yes, the shape of an object can greatly affect its ability to roll or slide. Objects with round or curved surfaces, such as a ball or a wheel, are able to roll more easily because they have a smaller surface area in contact with the ground. On the other hand, objects with flat or uneven surfaces, such as a book or a shoe, are more likely to slide due to their larger surface area in contact with the ground.

3. How does the surface material impact rolling and sliding?

The surface material can greatly impact the ease of rolling and sliding. Smooth surfaces, such as ice or polished wood, have less friction and make it easier for an object to roll. Rough surfaces, such as carpet or gravel, have more friction and make it harder for an object to roll, causing it to slide instead.

4. Can rolling and sliding be affected by external forces?

Yes, external forces can affect the ease of rolling and sliding. For example, a strong wind blowing in the direction of an object's movement can make it easier to roll, while a strong wind blowing against the object's movement can make it harder to roll and cause it to slide.

5. How does the weight of an object impact rolling and sliding?

The weight of an object can also impact its ability to roll or slide. Heavier objects have more inertia, making it harder for them to start rolling or sliding. On the other hand, lighter objects have less inertia, making it easier for them to start rolling or sliding. However, once an object is in motion, its weight does not have a significant impact on its ability to continue rolling or sliding.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
786
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
37
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
8K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Mechanics
Replies
16
Views
896
Replies
6
Views
827
Replies
52
Views
4K
Back
Top