Coils & Questions: Charging Batteries with Magnets

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter secondfret
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coils
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the feasibility of charging batteries using a coil and moving steel objects instead of magnets. The original poster proposes wrapping a coil around a series of stationary magnets and passing a heavy steel object over it to generate electricity. Responses indicate that while a changing magnetic field is necessary for inducing current, the method described would produce significantly less current than moving magnets, making it impractical for charging batteries. Additionally, the introduction of moving metal objects would create eddy currents, further diminishing energy efficiency.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic induction principles
  • Familiarity with Faraday's Law of Electromagnetic Induction
  • Knowledge of eddy currents and their effects on energy loss
  • Basic concepts of coil design and magnetic fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Research Faraday's Law of Electromagnetic Induction
  • Explore the effects of eddy currents in conductive materials
  • Investigate coil design for optimal electromagnetic induction
  • Learn about practical applications of magnetic field interactions in energy generation
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physicists, electrical engineers, and inventors interested in alternative energy generation methods and the principles of electromagnetic induction.

secondfret
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Ok, you know those flashlights that you shake to charge the battery? I'm no physics major, but I get the basic idea. The magnet is passed through the coil, creating an electrical current. So here's my question:
Imagine I changed the structure of the coil a bit. If I take a series of magnets (arranged in a straight line), wrap a coil around them, and then pass a heavy steel object rapidly over the coil, will it have the same effect? Grant it, the magnets aren't moving inside the coil, but the steel object outside the coil will interact with each magnet inside the coil as it passes over them, creating a traveling flux in the magnetic field inside the coil. So just like in the flashlight, there's an constantly changing magnetic field inside a coil of wires connected to a battery. Will it charge the battery?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I imagine the changing flux will be significantly less than for the case of moving magnets, and thus the current generated will be significantly less. I predict you couldn't generate enough current to charge the battery enough to be practical.

Any particular reason you ask? Did you have some kind of device in mind?
 
Oh you know, glory, riches and solving the energy crisis. But I guess you've brought me back down to Earth. Let's look at this one more way. Forgive my ignorance if this is poses the exact same problem.

This time I have a large coil in which small magnets are attached to every inch of the inner surface. Now I pass a steel object rapidly through the coil... anything?

As you can see I'm trying to create a coil that generates electricity without the benefit of a moving magnet. I can only use moving metal objects. Any insight?
 
I don't see any advantage to this. Magnets are metallic, so why do you prefer to have additional metal in there?
 
It's not an advantage, it's a limitation :)
Forgive me for being purposely vague
 
You'll find that whatever the mechanism there's a force between the moving object and the coils by which the mechanical energy is being converted (via negative work) to the electrical energy. Or as Larry Niven's Lunies would say: "TANSTAAFL"
 
Let me add, that any metal you have moving around the magnets will have eddy currents generated within them since they are conductors as well as potentially ferromagnetic. This will add greatly to the loss of energy in whateveritisyourtryingtodo. Think of the piece of metal as a coil which is shorted out.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
7K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
7K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K