Now I'm trying to imagine the wavefuction before and after collapse when measured at either slit. Before the particle enters the slits I imagine the wavefunction more as a planar wave with no definite position (single wavenumber and a superposition of positions). If no measurement is made then our particle acts similar to a water wave when it comes to the two slits. It has a very definite wavenumber and hence it can constructively/destructively interfere with itself. If a measurement is made at either slit the wavefunction collapses to a very definite position (either slit A or slit B). This collapsed wavefunction is still a wave, but diffraction or interference would be almost impossible to detect as we now have many spatial frequency components. Do we know why the act of measurement simultaneously collapses the WF to a definitive position, whilst increasing its wavenumber components? Can we think of the particle pre-measurement as "coherent" and post-measurement "de-cohered", I'm confused as how coherence plays a role in the single particle experiment?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Also..If, after the collapse of the wavefunction, we let the particle propagate would it spread out over time due to the Schrodinger Equation?

Hope this makes sense!

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Collapse of Wavefunction, Double-Slit Experiment

Loading...

Similar Threads - Collapse Wavefunction Double | Date |
---|---|

I Superposition state and wavefunction collapse | Dec 22, 2017 |

I Regarding consciousness causing wavefunction collapse | Jul 27, 2017 |

I What 'Collapses' the Wavefunction of the Universe? | Jan 17, 2017 |

I The nature of wavefunctions collapse | Dec 29, 2016 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**