Collapse of Wavefunction, Double-Slit Experiment

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the collapse of the wavefunction in the context of the double-slit experiment, specifically addressing the behavior of particles before and after measurement. Prior to measurement, the wavefunction behaves as a planar wave with a single wavenumber, allowing for interference. Upon measurement at either slit, the wavefunction collapses to a definite position, resulting in increased wavenumber components and diminished interference visibility. The conversation also touches on the implications of coherence and the propagation of the wavefunction post-collapse, referencing the Schrödinger Equation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wavefunction collapse in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with the double-slit experiment
  • Knowledge of the Schrödinger Equation
  • Concept of coherence and decoherence in quantum systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of wavefunction collapse in quantum mechanics
  • Study the double-slit experiment with a focus on measurement effects
  • Explore the role of coherence and decoherence in quantum systems
  • Examine the mathematical formulation of the Schrödinger Equation
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in the foundational principles of wave-particle duality and measurement in quantum systems.

crissyb1988
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Now I'm trying to imagine the wavefuction before and after collapse when measured at either slit. Before the particle enters the slits I imagine the wavefunction more as a planar wave with no definite position (single wavenumber and a superposition of positions). If no measurement is made then our particle acts similar to a water wave when it comes to the two slits. It has a very definite wavenumber and hence it can constructively/destructively interfere with itself. If a measurement is made at either slit the wavefunction collapses to a very definite position (either slit A or slit B). This collapsed wavefunction is still a wave, but diffraction or interference would be almost impossible to detect as we now have many spatial frequency components. Do we know why the act of measurement simultaneously collapses the WF to a definitive position, whilst increasing its wavenumber components? Can we think of the particle pre-measurement as "coherent" and post-measurement "de-cohered", I'm confused as how coherence plays a role in the single particle experiment?

Also..If, after the collapse of the wavefunction, we let the particle propagate would it spread out over time due to the Schrödinger Equation?

Hope this makes sense!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
crissyb1988 said:
... If no measurement is made then our particle acts similar to a water wave when it comes to the two slits. It has a very definite wavenumber and hence it can constructively/destructively interfere with itself. If a measurement is made at either slit the wavefunction collapses to a very definite position (either slit A or slit B). This collapsed wavefunction is still a wave, but diffraction or interference would be almost impossible to detect as we now have many spatial frequency components. Do we know why the act of measurement simultaneously collapses the WF to a definitive position, whilst increasing its wavenumber components? ...

The classical picture will have problems. We can place polarizers in front of each slit to gain information about the photon. When they are parallel, there will be interference and the associated pattern. When crossed, there will be no interference and just the 2 bar pattern building up.

So there is not the kind of collapse you are envisioning (to a point particle).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
crissyb1988 said:
This collapsed wavefunction is still a wave

Hmmm

You may be confused about a few things.

There is no collapse in the double slit experiment because the photon etc is destroyed.

You may want to check out an QM analysis of the experiment:
http://arxiv.org/ftp/quant-ph/papers/0703/0703126.pdf

Thanks
Bill
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
5K