Collimating incoherent light emitted by a LED

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jcfutbal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Led Light
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on methods to collimate light emitted from a 12mm² LED with an 80° divergence angle into a beam of 5-10mm diameter. The user has an aspheric condenser lens with a 13.7mm effective focal length but struggles with significant light loss when attempting to reduce beam size. Suggestions include using a pinhole setup to create a reduced image of the light source, followed by a lens to produce a collimated beam, although this method results in considerable light loss. The conversation emphasizes the limitations of incoherent light sources compared to laser diodes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of optical principles, specifically collimation techniques.
  • Familiarity with lens configurations, particularly aspheric lenses.
  • Knowledge of beam divergence and its impact on light intensity.
  • Experience with optical setups, including the use of pinholes and optical benches.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research advanced lens configurations for LED collimation.
  • Explore the use of optical benches for stable setups in light experiments.
  • Investigate spatial filtering techniques to minimize light loss during collimation.
  • Learn about the differences between incoherent light sources and laser diodes in terms of collimation.
USEFUL FOR

Optical engineers, physicists, and hobbyists interested in light manipulation and collimation techniques, particularly those working with LEDs and incoherent light sources.

jcfutbal
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello,

What would be the best method to "collimate" light from a LED with an emitting area of 12mm^2 and a maximum divergence angle of 80° with minimal loss of light intensity?

I want to collimate it into a beam of approximately 5-10mm.

I have an aspheric condenser lense at hand with an effective focal length of 13.7mm. This lens succeeds in making the beam spherical, with a diameter of approximately 30mm at the focal length, but it still undergoes significant divergence. I have tried adding more positive lenses into the optical system to try, but I can't seem to create such a small beam diameter without losing a great portion of the emitted lighted.

Is there any particular lense configuration I could use?

Thanks.
 
Science news on Phys.org
I think it is hard to keep a significant fraction of light in the beam, unless you add a lense every 2-5 cm or something similar. You cannot reduce the phase-space size of your light, no matter how the setup looks like.
 
Last edited:
I agree with mfb- the large size of the emitter restricts your ability to collimate the beam at even a moderate diameter without lossy beam shaping (spatial filtering, for example).

Over what range does the beam need to be 5-10mm in diameter?
 
there is no limit as to distance, as I have a lot of mirrors available and a lot of workspace. what is the best way to reduce the amount of light lost? I managed to "collimate" it to a diameter of about 10mm, but in order to do so I used a setup similar to a pinhole and I lost a lot of light. but to me at this stage a pinhole seems the way to go...
 
to ask the obvious...

why not just use a laser LED ?? already collimated with built in lens :)

Dave
 
i want to try and use a LED instead!
 
You´re perfectly right about the pinhole.
The standard way of producing a parallel beam used to be:
Use a lens to produce a (reduced) image of your light source onto/into a pinhole. Try to capture as much of the light as possible.
On the other side of the pinhole, use a lens to produce your collimated beam. Then you use autocollimation to adjust the position (and tilt) of the lens for minimal divergence (and beam position). Beam size adjustment requires a diaphragm.
But of course you will lose a lot of light this way. You can vary the pinhole size for the best compromise.
And you´d better use an optical bench or an optical table for mechanical stability.
 
"no limit as to distance" implies zero power from an incoherent source, even if there were no diffraction.

A laser diode would be limited by diffraction. You get one diode in each CD or DVD reader-burner.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K