Collision of a billiard ball against a wall

AI Thread Summary
The collision of a billiard ball against a wall is generally considered elastic, meaning that the total kinetic energy before and after the collision remains equal. However, the wall does absorb some energy, primarily converting it into sound rather than heat, which raises questions about the true nature of the collision's elasticity. The discussion highlights that while the wall does not visibly move, it does feel the momentum of the ball, indicating that energy transfer occurs. The definition of an elastic collision is clarified as one where energy is conserved, though in practical scenarios, some energy is inevitably lost to sound. Ultimately, the collision is not perfectly elastic, as some energy is dissipated, challenging the initial assumption of perfect elasticity.
themagiciant95
Messages
56
Reaction score
5
The collision of a billiard ball against a wall is considered elastic. Intuitively i can accept it. But analytically i don't understand it.

Why does the wall not take any relevant amount of energy from the ball? Is it connected to the change in temperature of the wall ?
What scenarios can we aproximate as elastic ? Under what characteristics ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The wall definitely feels the momentum of the ball. The wall is just very firm. It isn't going to move. Most of the energy just gets transferred into sound, not as much in heat.
 
lekh2003 said:
The wall definitely feels the momentum of the ball. The wall is just very firm. It isn't going to move. Most of the energy just gets transferred into sound, not as much in heat.

So the only fact that allows us to consider the collision as elastic, is that the energy dissipated by the wall is very low ?
 
themagiciant95 said:
So the only fact that allows us to consider the collision as elastic, is that the energy dissipated by the wall is very low ?
That is the definition of elastic collision.
 
  • Like
Likes themagiciant95
themagiciant95 said:
So the only fact that allows us to consider the collision as elastic, is that the energy dissipated by the wall is very low ?
A.T. is correct, an elastic collision is defined as a collision where the energy is transferred to other methods of energy transfer besides collisions.
 
lekh2003 said:
A.T. is correct, an elastic collision is defined as a collision where the energy is transferred to other methods of energy transfer besides collisions.
Nice that we agree, but I don't understand your definition at all. Why not keep it simple:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elastic_collision

"An elastic collision is an encounter between two bodies in which the total kinetic energy of the two bodies after the encounter is equal to their total kinetic energy before the encounter."
 
A.T. said:
Nice that we agree, but I don't understand your definition at all. Why not keep it simple:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elastic_collision

"An elastic collision is an encounter between two bodies in which the total kinetic energy of the two bodies after the encounter is equal to their total kinetic energy before the encounter."
Sure, I might be going on a tangent. But yes, the total energy is conserved, even if that requires energy going into sound.
 
lekh2003 said:
Sure, I might be going on a tangent. But yes, the total energy is conserved, even if that requires energy going into sound.
In an ideal elastic collision the total macroscopic kinetic energy is conserved. No energy goes into sound.
 
A.T. said:
In an ideal elastic collision the total macroscopic kinetic energy is conserved. No energy goes into sound.
But in the OP's question, it is not perfectly elastic, some of the energy goes into sound. I find that it would be better not to discuss perfectly elastic collisions since the OP is familiar with this.

The OP is questioning how the collision can be perfectly elastic which it is not.
 

Similar threads

Replies
32
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
53
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
6K
Back
Top