Color images of red/green lasers

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on capturing images of red and green laser dots using a laptop's USB camera, highlighting issues such as artifacts and color representation. The artifact observed with the green laser is attributed to internal reflection and imperfect filtering by the camera's Bayer filter, which can cause the appearance of multiple colors in what should be monochromatic images. The central regions of the laser dots appear white due to the saturation of the camera's sensors and the interpolation algorithm interpreting excess brightness. To achieve a true monochromatic representation without white sections, users are advised to reduce exposure and consider using specialized cameras with multiple sensors.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Bayer filter technology
  • Knowledge of camera sensor types and their functionalities
  • Familiarity with digital image processing techniques
  • Basic principles of light and color theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "Bayer filter technology" and its impact on color imaging
  • Explore "advanced industrial camera systems" and their sensor configurations
  • Learn about "digital image processing algorithms" for color correction
  • Investigate "light intensity and color perception" in human vision
USEFUL FOR

Photographers, optical engineers, and anyone interested in the technical aspects of capturing and processing laser imagery.

inquisitivegeek
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I'm new to the forums.

I recently tried to take an image of two laser dots on a white wall, using my laptop's USB camera. I saved them to PNGs.

I have a number of questions...
1. There was an artifact with the green laser, where a smaller second dot appeared for some reason. What caused the artifact?

2. The lasers are AFAIK monochromatic, however the red or green in the images clearly are not monochromatic. Why is this?

3. Why are the central, brightest regions of the laser dots colored as white? My hunch is that it has something to do with the Bayer interpolation algorithm that interprets very bright red/green (and probably, blue) spots as white, without checking whether the other colors are bright too.

Cheers,
J.
 

Attachments

  • just_two_lasers.png
    just_two_lasers.png
    14.5 KB · Views: 675
Engineering news on Phys.org
inquisitivegeek said:
Hi all,

I'm new to the forums.
Welcome to PF!

inquisitivegeek said:
1. There was an artifact with the green laser, where a smaller second dot appeared for some reason. What caused the artifact?
I would guess internal reflection. What type of camera did you use? If you center the green laser, do you see multiple additional dots?
inquisitivegeek said:
2. The lasers are AFAIK monochromatic, however the red or green in the images clearly are not monochromatic. Why is this?

3. Why are the central, brightest regions of the laser dots colored as white? My hunch is that it has something to do with the Bayer interpolation algorithm that interprets very bright red/green (and probably, blue) spots as white, without checking whether the other colors are bright too.
I think these two are related. The light is probably so bright that it not only saturates the red or green sensors, but is also detected by the other sensors (imperfect filtering).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: inquisitivegeek
the camera has filters for the CCD (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayer_filter). If the red and green do not just happen to exactly match the filters, or if there is filter overlap, the image will appear as "not monochromatic". That is, it will show contents in multiple sensors.

Note that there are also more green sensors than blue or red. Maybe the extra dot is caused by the post processing algorithms. You can try to analyze what happens as you change angles and positions. (it is most likely a reflection, as DrClaude suggested, it could be in the lens array)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: inquisitivegeek
Hi all,

Thanks for the replies.

Regarding the little green dot artifact, it is still there if I try taking it from a different position; see second attached photo. The camera is an in-built camera on the laptop (driver is that of a USB camera).

So, if I understand your explanations correctly, an imperfect filter is a filter that does not entirely reduce the spectral transmittance of other wavelengths intended to be filtered, to zero. Hence for the red or green laser, some light is detected by the green/blue or red/blue pixels, and the interpolation algorithm interpolates this to be white light.

Maybe these are silly questions, but: clearly any real-life scene is a juxtaposition of different color wavelengths + intensities. How can any digital, 2D color image represent different intensities of monochromatic light? How does the human eye represent different intensities of monochromatic light? We clearly have a concept in our brain of a bright or dim color.

If you wanted to take a picture of a monochromatic laser dot, and wanted it to display the dot as:
1. Monochromatic
2. Without any white-sections

How would you do it?

Thanks for all your input!

Cheers,
J.
 

Attachments

  • two_dots_b.png
    two_dots_b.png
    12.1 KB · Views: 624
Reduce the exposure/brightness so the center of the dot isn't blown-out.
 
Advanced industrial cameras have sensors for each color. For example, take three CCDs each with a different color filter. On some systems multiple exposures are made on a single sensor, each with a different filter (like Mars rover, satellites, etc.)

All filters have "bandwidth" and multiple filters will overlap. The odds of a filter's center frequency exactly matching your laser is small unless you specify it to be such.

If you want a monochromatic picture, use a monochromatic sensor. Take a B/W picture and edit it to be green.

You are also seeing dispersion for various reasons.

As for the dot, you need to examine how its position moves as the camera angle changes.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
42K