Color Organ Filters: Bass/Mid/Treble Cutoff Freqs

  • Thread starter Thread starter jav276
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Frequencies
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining appropriate cutoff frequencies for bass, mid, and treble filters in the design of a color organ. Participants explore the theoretical and practical aspects of audio frequency separation, including suggestions for frequency ranges and tools for experimentation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses uncertainty about the cutoff frequencies for bass, mid, and treble, noting a general hearing range of 200 Hz to 20 kHz but questioning its applicability for filtering audio signals.
  • Another participant suggests specific frequency ranges: Bass (0 - 120 Hz), Mid (120 Hz - 5 kHz), and Treble (5 kHz - 20 kHz), while also expressing doubt about the upper limit for mid frequencies, considering 3 or 4 kHz as potentially more appropriate.
  • A suggestion is made to use a graphic equalizer app to visualize sound frequencies, which could aid in understanding the frequency characteristics of audio.
  • Participants mention the use of a tone generator to experience the auditory range below 2 kHz and discuss various software options for equalization and spectrum analysis.
  • Some participants share recommendations for specific software tools, including Winamp and Voxengo SPAN, for audio processing and analysis.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on the exact cutoff frequencies for the filters, as participants propose different ranges and express uncertainty about the appropriateness of those ranges. Multiple competing views remain regarding the best approach to filter audio signals for a color organ.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge variations in human hearing and the potential limitations of their suggested frequency ranges. There is also mention of the need for further exploration and experimentation with different tools and software.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals interested in audio processing, color organ design, or those seeking to understand frequency characteristics in sound.

jav276
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
So I am making a color organ using my ipod, speakers, splitter, butterworth filters with gain for three separate frequencies. I want to have a low, mid, and high but I have no idea what the cutoff frequencies for each should be. I know we hear something like a band of 200 Hz to 20 kHz but I am totally not sure at all if that would be reasonable to filter an audio signal to separate bass, treble, and mid sounds. So my question is what cutoff frequencies should i use to adequately filter bass, mid, and treble with each of the three filters I am designing?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
jav276 said:
So I am making a color organ using my ipod, speakers, splitter, butterworth filters with gain for three separate frequencies. I want to have a low, mid, and high but I have no idea what the cutoff frequencies for each should be. I know we hear something like a band of 200 Hz to 20 kHz but I am totally not sure at all if that would be reasonable to filter an audio signal to separate bass, treble, and mid sounds. So my question is what cutoff frequencies should i use to adequately filter bass, mid, and treble with each of the three filters I am designing?

You might want to take a look at this vintage article from the 60's:

"Musette" color organ
 
I'd probably suggest something like

Bass range: 0 - 120 Hz
Mid range: 120 Hz - 5 kHz*
Treble range: 5* - 20 kHz

* EDIT: On a second thought, I had some doubts; 5 kHz might be too high, maybe 3 or 4 kHz would be better, I'm not sure, I've never built any light organ. But I've done a lot of audio processing and I've built various audiohardware, so I'm probably not completely off :biggrin:.

The human hearing range is about 20 Hz - 20 kHz (not 200 Hz - 20 kHz) and with some individual variations. You can also google for "instrument frequency chart"; such charts can be helpful. I'm posting an example of such a chart here:

2024_FreqGraph.gif
 
Last edited:
An interesting way to play with it is to install a graphic equalizer app and play with the frequency ranges. You can sort of try to visualize sound vs light. Has drawbacks, but helps you to understand the frequency characteristics of the stuff you listen to.
 
have you tried this tone generator ? It only goes to about 2khz, but gives a feel for how much of what we hear is below that.

http://www.seventhstring.com/tuningfork/tuningfork.html
 
meBigGuy said:
An interesting way to play with it is to install a graphic equalizer app and play with the frequency ranges. You can sort of try to visualize sound vs light. Has drawbacks, but helps you to understand the frequency characteristics of the stuff you listen to.

That is an excellent suggestion. :thumbs:

EDIT: try an equalizer which shows the spectrum, like e.g.:

graphic-eq.jpg


(I will give you some suggestions on free software, got to check my resources, I'll be back soon...)
 
Last edited:
Some software suggestions:

  1. In the http://www.winamp.com/media-player, there is a built-in equalizer and a spectrum (but the spectrum window is pretty small, though).
  2. Free spectrum analyzers can be found here.
  3. Free equalizers can be found here.
Regarding point 2 and 3 I'm not sure if the list contains only VST plugins (which need an audio software host) or also includes stand-alone software. I would personally try this: Voxengo SPAN (it's a free plugin). I haven't tried that particular plugin, but I have tried other Voxengo software, and they are pretty good.

Maybe someone else here has a suggestion on a stand-alone equalizer/spectrum analyzer.
 
Winamp is OK because you can change it while listening. The spectrum window sucks though (shows clipping when there is none, and it always shows the input spectrum, not the results after EQ.)

Third octave equalizers are the best since the position of the sliders are a good representation of the actual frequency response. The final curves with winamp won't really be the slider positions (close enough for getting a feel though)
 
those are some awesome suggestions. thank you very much
 

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
47
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
9K