Combination of freefalling and constant horizontal movement

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving an object thrown from a plane at a height of 10 km with a horizontal speed of 300 m/s. Participants are tasked with determining the total distance from the plane to the landing point and the time taken for the fall, while neglecting air resistance.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between horizontal and vertical motion, questioning how the time of freefall relates to horizontal travel. There are attempts to derive equations for total distance and time, with some confusion about the distinction between distance and displacement in physics.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the nature of the motion, emphasizing that horizontal and vertical components occur simultaneously. There is ongoing exploration of the implications of the equations used, with some participants expressing confusion about the results and the physical meaning of the times calculated.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of distinguishing between distance and displacement in physics, as well as the impact of gravity on the time of fall, independent of horizontal motion. There is acknowledgment of potential artifacts in the mathematical solutions presented.

lendav_rott
Messages
232
Reaction score
10

Homework Statement


At the height of H, from a plane with the speed of V, there is an object "thrown off".
H = 10km = 10 000m
V = 300m/s

To be determined:
- total distance from the plane to the falling point - S
- the time the fall takes - T
do not have to take aerial friction into account

Homework Equations


s = v0t + at²/2



The Attempt at a Solution


-Take the positive direction of movement as movement from the ground to the sky
-horizontal acceleration = 0 , vertical acceleration = -g = -9.8m/s²


the total distance is the sum of the distance traveled vertically and horizontally (sum of 2 vectors that is or that would make sense atleast)

so S² = (VT)² + (-gT²/2)²

But I have 2 unknowns and 1 equation. What will I have to do next?

Also I apologise in advance - I don't know all the mathematical terminology in English that well, so some things may seem a bit confusing :/

Cheers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You know the distance of vertical travel: this is the height from which the object is released.
 
I'm sorry, that was rather vague - what exactly do you mean by that?

Do you mean that horizontal travel lasts exactly the same time as freefall would?
so if the time of freefall were Tf = (2H/g)^0.5 ~ 45 seconds
Horizontal travel - 13500m

So total distance S² = 13500² + 10000² ?, plug into the original equation and solve for T?
 
The horizontal travel happens simultaneously with the vertical travel, as they are parts of one and the same single motion. So yes, their durations must be equal.
 
This is a problem in "ballistics" (you may want to look it up) ... you treat the horizontal and vertical components of the motion separately. Draw a v-t diagram for each motion: displacement in each direction is the area under the graph and the acceleration is the slope - as voko says, the time is fixed by the vertical distance and the acceleration of gravity.

The question seems to be asking for the horizontal distance to the landing point.
 
I got it solved and the solutions are 96, 685s and -35,461s

But when I took the positive direction movement the same as the falling object's, the solutions are the same only -96, 685 and 35, 461.

With the first pair of solutions the parabole is upside down and the 96, 685 is T where S=-(13500² + 10000²)^0.5 (~-16800m)
but what is the other T? S is still the same, but what S is that?
EDIT: It made me think of another thing - S is only the displacement between the starting point and the landing point, how would I find out the total distance traveled by the object, because the trajectory of the object is curved hence it should be longer than the displacement.
 
Last edited:
lendav_rott said:
I got it solved and the solutions are 96, 685s and -35,461s

Now I am confused. What are these times? You solved the problem in #3 as far as I can tell.

EDIT: It made me think of another thing - S is only the displacement between the starting point and the landing point, how would I find out the total distance traveled by the object, because the trajectory of the object is curved hence it should be longer than the displacement.

I do not know what word was used in the original language of the problem, but in English "distance" and "displacement" mean the same thing. The length of a trajectory between two points will obviously be different (except for wholly unaccelerated motion) from the distance between the points, but to find this length you need to apply calculus.
 
voko said:
Now I am confused. What are these times? You solved the problem in #3 as far as I can tell.

I only found the time it took for freefall at the height of H in #3.
The time, how long it travels the entire distance, I got from:
-gT² + VT = -S and S² = H² + (Horizontally traveled distance during the freefall time)²

96 seconds sounds very much more realistic than 45 seconds, because it's also moving horizontally - well that is how I understood it.
 
lendav_rott said:
I only found the time it took for freefall at the height of H in #3.
The time, how long it travels the entire distance

As Simon Bridge and I explained to you earlier, these are one and the same time. The time to reach the ground from height H is INDEPENDENT of any horizontal motion; it depends ONLY on H (and initial VERTICAL velocity, if any).
 
  • #10
Wait, so if I throw a stone off a roof or I let it drop down - the time for it to reach the ground is always the same? Assuming I'm not aiming toward the sky but exactly horizontally, parallel to the ground below.

E:Oh, ofcourse the only thing different is the speed
 
  • #11
lendav_rott said:
Wait, so if I throw a stone off a roof or I let it drop down - the time for it to reach the ground is always the same?

Neglecting air resistance, yes. This is because the force of gravity is independent of velocity.
 
  • #12
Yeah, well thanks a lot Simon and voko - NOW I finally get it :)
 
  • #13
voko said:
in English "distance" and "displacement" mean the same thing.
But not in physics they don't. In physics, they have a special meaning: displacement, for example, is a vector - the magnitude of the displacement is an example of a distance.

More importantly, if you travel in a circle with a circumference C, then you have traveled a distance of C but your displacement is zero.

Displacement is the area under a v-t graph - if the area is below the t-axis then the displacement is negative.

In this problem, the vy-t graph is a triangle with base T and height vy ... vy/T=g (taking "down" as positive) and h=vyT/2; the vx-t graph is just horizontal, so the acceleration is zero, and the horizontal distance is d=vxT

This gives you three equations and three unknowns.
1. the vertical speed on arrival
2. time to the target
3. horizontal distance to the target

If you solve for time you will get two answers! That is an artifact of the math used - one of the times is non-physical. (We've actually left some information out.) As usual the math contains more than what is available in the Universe, which is why we do experiments: just to check.

lendav_rott said:
Wait, so if I throw a stone off a roof or I let it drop down - the time for it to reach the ground is always the same? Assuming I'm not aiming toward the sky but exactly horizontally, parallel to the ground below.

E:Oh, ofcourse the only thing different is the speed
That's the "ahah!" moment all us educators live for :D Well done!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
822
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
5K