Combined resistance in this circuit

  • Thread starter Thread starter Eitan Levy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit Resistance
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the combined resistance in a circuit once a switch is closed, with the final answer being 4Ω. The user initially attempted to apply Kirchhoff’s law but found it cumbersome. They later used a spreadsheet to estimate currents and voltages, ultimately leading to an approximate solution. The conversation highlights the efficiency of using Y-Δ transforms for circuit analysis, suggesting it as a superior method for calculating resistance.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Kirchhoff’s laws
  • Familiarity with circuit analysis techniques
  • Proficiency in using spreadsheets for calculations
  • Knowledge of Y-Δ transforms in electrical circuits
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn about Y-Δ transforms for circuit analysis
  • Explore advanced applications of Kirchhoff’s laws
  • Practice using Excel for electrical circuit calculations
  • Investigate other methods for calculating combined resistance in complex circuits
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, circuit designers, and anyone involved in analyzing or optimizing electrical circuits.

Eitan Levy
Messages
259
Reaction score
11

Homework Statement


Find the combined resistance once the switch is closed.

Homework Equations


V=IR

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried applying Kirchoff’s law but I got many equations, I am sure there is a more efficient way. I also tried to re-draw the circuit, but wasn't sure how to do so. The answer is 4Ω.
 

Attachments

  • ‏‏לכידה.PNG
    ‏‏לכידה.PNG
    2.6 KB · Views: 482
Physics news on Phys.org
The resistance is measured from top to bottom.
I do not get exactly 4.

I used a spread sheet.
I took node C as the top and D as the bottom, and assumed the current through the network was 1.
Then I set current CA to an estimated value and deduced all other currents (CB, AB, BD, and AD) based on that. Then, given the resistances, I computed all 5 of those voltages. Then I computed the total voltages CA+AB+BD and CB-AB+AD. Then I adjusted my original estimate for CA current to make those two total voltages equal.

That's probably as awkward as any other method. But it gave me an answer.
 
Last edited:
.Scott said:
The resistance is measured from top to bottom.
I do not get exactly 4.
Perhaps it was rounded. Could you explain how you got it?
 
Eitan Levy said:
Perhaps it was rounded. Could you explain how you got it?
I just edited post #2 with details.
If you're handy with Excel (or other spread sheet), it is pretty straight forward.
 
Eitan Levy said:
Could you explain how you got it?
Resistors28628.png


Cells F18:21 are copies of F17.
Cells H23:J23 are copies of G23

All 4 values on row 22 should be the total voltage (and therefore impedance) from top (node C) to bottom (node D)

The 0.023 factor in line 25 results from experimentation. I did a few E23 adjustments manually until I saw what the approximate correction factor was. Then I put that into the "Improved Estimate" calculation.
 

Attachments

  • Resistors28628.png
    Resistors28628.png
    21.9 KB · Views: 335
Eitan Levy said:
I am sure there is a more efficient way.
check out delta / Y transforms (or in your case, Y / delta transforms)
 
  • Like
Likes .Scott

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
892
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K