Combining Infinite Series: Can I Make These Two Series Start at the Same Point?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on combining two infinite series into a single expression that starts at the same index. The first series, represented as [m=2 to ∞] ∑m(m-1)amxm-2, is successfully rewritten using the substitution n=m-2, resulting in [n=0 to ∞] ∑(n+2)(n+1)an+2xn. However, the second series, [k=1 to ∞] x∑kakxk-1, presents challenges in aligning the indices. The participants emphasize the need to adjust the starting point of the second series to match the first, highlighting the importance of maintaining the integrity of the terms in the process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of infinite series and summation notation
  • Familiarity with index manipulation in series
  • Knowledge of polynomial terms and their coefficients
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Research techniques for manipulating series indices in summations
  • Explore the concept of generating functions for series
  • Learn about convergence criteria for infinite series
  • Study examples of combining series in mathematical analysis
USEFUL FOR

Students in advanced mathematics, particularly those studying series and sequences, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to infinite series manipulation.

Jamin2112
Messages
973
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement



Rewrite the given expression as a sum whose generic term involves xn

[m=2 to ∞] ∑m(m-1)amxm-2 + [k=1 to ∞] x∑kakxk-1

Homework Equations



None in this problem

The Attempt at a Solution



To make the first part involve only xn, I can use the substitution n=m-2.

[n=0 to ∞] ∑(n+2)(n+1)an+2xn.

But I can't make the second part in terms of xn and [n=0 to ∞], as far as I know.

[k=1 to ∞] x∑kakxk-1 = [k=1 to ∞] ∑kakxk = [n=1 to ∞] ∑nanxn

If I try to take change the start of the sum to n=0, that will effect the xn. See what I'm saying? I want to combine this into one big sum from n=0 to ∞.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jamin2112 said:
[k=1 to ∞] x∑kakxk-1 = [k=1 to ∞] ∑kakxk = [n=1 to ∞] ∑nanxn

If I try to take change the start of the sum to n=0, that will effect the xn. See what I'm saying?
So don't do that then. At this stage you have two series, both of which are in terms of xn. The only problem is one starts at n=0 while the other starts at n=1. Can you make them start at the same point?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K