Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the process of publishing in physics journals, focusing on aspects such as authorship, supplementary materials, and the collaborative nature of writing papers in experimental physics. It includes considerations of practical experiences and practices within the field.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Technical explanation
- Debate/contested
Main Points Raised
- Some participants suggest that learning to publish papers is best achieved through hands-on experience, including reviewing drafts from others and engaging in discussions.
- It is noted that in experimental particle physics, authorship can be complex due to large collaborations, often leading to alphabetical listing of authors.
- Participants mention the importance of figures in physics papers and the need for flexibility in editing these figures during the publication process.
- Questions arise regarding the limitations on the number of pages for supplementary materials, with some participants indicating that this can vary by journal.
- There is a suggestion that supplementary materials may not be subject to page limits, especially in high-energy physics, where they can be extensive and are often not refereed.
- Concerns are raised about how supplementary materials are handled in journals with strict page limits, such as PRL, and whether they incur additional publication fees.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express varying views on the management and limitations of supplementary materials, indicating that the practices may differ by journal. There is no consensus on specific policies regarding page limits or publication fees.
Contextual Notes
Limitations include the variability of journal policies regarding supplementary materials and authorship practices, which may depend on the specific field or journal. The discussion does not resolve these uncertainties.