Comments - Publishing in a Physics Journal

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the process of publishing in physics journals, focusing on aspects such as authorship, supplementary materials, and the collaborative nature of writing papers in experimental physics. It includes considerations of practical experiences and practices within the field.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that learning to publish papers is best achieved through hands-on experience, including reviewing drafts from others and engaging in discussions.
  • It is noted that in experimental particle physics, authorship can be complex due to large collaborations, often leading to alphabetical listing of authors.
  • Participants mention the importance of figures in physics papers and the need for flexibility in editing these figures during the publication process.
  • Questions arise regarding the limitations on the number of pages for supplementary materials, with some participants indicating that this can vary by journal.
  • There is a suggestion that supplementary materials may not be subject to page limits, especially in high-energy physics, where they can be extensive and are often not refereed.
  • Concerns are raised about how supplementary materials are handled in journals with strict page limits, such as PRL, and whether they incur additional publication fees.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying views on the management and limitations of supplementary materials, indicating that the practices may differ by journal. There is no consensus on specific policies regarding page limits or publication fees.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the variability of journal policies regarding supplementary materials and authorship practices, which may depend on the specific field or journal. The discussion does not resolve these uncertainties.

ZapperZ
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
32,819
Reaction score
4,723
ZapperZ submitted a new PF Insights post

Publishing in a Physics Journal

physicsjournals-80x80.png


Continue reading the Original PF Insights Post.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mfb and blue_leaf77
Physics news on Phys.org
These are all things that you will pick up along the way as you write your first, and subsequent papers. There’s no way to learn other than by doing it yourself.
Get paper drafts from others and review them, then discuss your comments with others.
This is always done in experimental particle physics within the collaborations, but it is possible elsewhere too.

Physics papers tend to have figures, especially graphs.
... and you should be able to change elements in the graph easily (i. e. not with photoshop) because you probably have to do so between the first draft and the final paper.
[Addendum to the original article – In experimental high energy physics papers, the number of people participating in the work can be HUGE, often more than a hundred. It is usually difficult to pick a single person who did more work than others in such a collaboration. So for such papers, the authors are listed alphabatically using their last names.]
For the same reason, it is also typical that the collaborations maintain a single author list. Everyone on that list gets listed as author for every paper, regardless of the contribution to this specific paper.

Preprint servers could be worth a note, given their importance in some fields.
 
Sometimes I found papers accompanied by a supplementary material, in whcih usually the author elaborates his method and/or derivations to the formulae appearing in the main paper. Is there also limitation on the number of page of the supplementary material?
 
If the supplementary material is managed by the journal, it might depend on the journal.
In high-energy physics (probably elsewhere as well but I don't know) this material is available independently of the journal, so there is no page limit. Sometimes you even get an internal support note for a public support note, which can have 200+ pages.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: blue_leaf77
blue_leaf77 said:
Sometimes I found papers accompanied by a supplementary material, in whcih usually the author elaborates his method and/or derivations to the formulae appearing in the main paper. Is there also limitation on the number of page of the supplementary material?

As mfb said, it depends on the journal. Often the supplementary part is available only online, it isn't refereed, and it is usually minimally formatted and typeset. This means that the cost, if any, to the journal is minimal. So I doubt that it counts as part of the publication fee. How that is handled in journals such as PRL that has a strict page limit, I'm not sure.

Zz.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: blue_leaf77

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
17K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K