- #1
ray3400
- 24
- 1
- TL;DR Summary
- Question about trying to utilize quantum entanglement to create a communication protocol.
Which of these premises is impossible or incorrect according to our current understanding of quantum entanglement?
Given 2 entangled particles, p1 and p2:
If these two premises can be held as true, someone can theoretically build a functional communication protocol using quantum entanglement. Even though the spins are randomized, all one needs is to generate an event trigger from the sender to the receiver. I.e. when p1 is observed, p2 changes its spin. The change in spin generates a 5v signal on a wire (the direction of the spin is arbitrary). Data can be encoded using time differentiation between the signals - I.e. a 1 ms delay is a binary 0, a 2 ms delay is a binary 1.
Given 2 entangled particles, p1 and p2:
- Observing paired particle p1 induces a change in spin on paired particle p2.
- There a way of detecting a change in spin on particle p2 without observing its starting point.
If these two premises can be held as true, someone can theoretically build a functional communication protocol using quantum entanglement. Even though the spins are randomized, all one needs is to generate an event trigger from the sender to the receiver. I.e. when p1 is observed, p2 changes its spin. The change in spin generates a 5v signal on a wire (the direction of the spin is arbitrary). Data can be encoded using time differentiation between the signals - I.e. a 1 ms delay is a binary 0, a 2 ms delay is a binary 1.