Commutation relation for Hermitian operators

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves Hermitian operators \(\hat{A}\), \(\hat{B}\), and \(\hat{C}\) and their commutation relation \([\hat{A},\hat{B}] = c\hat{C}\). The goal is to show that the constant \(c\) is a purely imaginary number.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss taking the Hermitian conjugate of the commutation relation and explore the implications of the properties of Hermitian operators. Questions arise about how these steps contribute to demonstrating the nature of \(c\).

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering guidance on manipulating the commutation relation and questioning assumptions about the operators involved. Some have reached a point of clarity regarding the relationship between \(c\) and its conjugate.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of the need to adhere to the homework template, which includes sections for the statement, attempts, and relevant equations. This suggests a structured approach to the problem-solving process.

jimmycricket
Messages
115
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


The Hermitian operators \hat{A},\hat{B},\hat{C} satisfy the commutation relation[\hat{A},\hat{B}]=c\hat{C}.
Show that c is a purely imaginary number.

The Attempt at a Solution



I don't usually post questions without some attempt at an answer but I am at a loss here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What happens if you take the Hermitian conjugate of that equality?

P.-S.: Don't forget that the homework template has three sections. You should've written down the relevant equations.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jimmycricket
[\hat{A},\hat{B}]^{\dagger}=[\hat{B},\hat{A}]=-[\hat{A},\hat{B}]
How does this help?
 
jimmycricket said:
[\hat{A},\hat{B}]^{\dagger}=[\hat{B},\hat{A}]=-[\hat{A},\hat{B}]
How does this help?
You forgot the right-hand-side of the original equality.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jimmycricket
[\hat{A},\hat{B}]^{\dagger}=[\hat{B},\hat{A}]=-[\hat{A},\hat{B}]=(c\hat{C})^{\dagger}
 
jimmycricket said:
[\hat{A},\hat{B}]^{\dagger}=[\hat{B},\hat{A}]=-[\hat{A},\hat{B}]=(c\hat{C})^{\dagger}
Continue...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jimmycricket
<br /> [\hat{A},\hat{B}]^{\dagger}=[\hat{B},\hat{A}]=-[\hat{A},\hat{B}]=(c\hat{C})^{\dagger}=c^{*}\hat{C}^{\dagger}
 
jimmycricket said:
<br /> [\hat{A},\hat{B}]^{\dagger}=[\hat{B},\hat{A}]=-[\hat{A},\hat{B}]=(c\hat{C})^{\dagger}=c^{*}\hat{C}^{\dagger}
You're almost there. To help you, I'll rewrite what you have there so that it may be more obvious what the last steps are.
$$
\begin{align*}
[\hat{A},\hat{B}]^{\dagger} &=(c\hat{C})^{\dagger} \\
[\hat{B},\hat{A}] &=c^{*}\hat{C}^{\dagger} \\
-[\hat{A},\hat{B}] &=c^{*}\hat{C}^{\dagger}
\end{align*}
$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jimmycricket
Im still having some trouble seeing where to go from here
 
  • #10
What properties does ##\hat{C}## have? Can you replace the left-hand-side by something else?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hari_donthi and jimmycricket
  • #11
Ahh ok I think I am there -[\hat{A},\hat{B}]=(c\hat{C})^{\dagger}=c^{*}\hat{C}^{\dagger}=c^*\hat{C} (since C is hermitian)
So we now have -[\hat{A},\hat{B}]=-c\hat{C}=c^*\hat{C}
\Longrightarrow \frac{c^*}{c}=-1
Only pure imaginary numbers satisfy this last condition.
 
  • #12
You got it!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jimmycricket
  • #13
thanks for your patience and for not giving it away too easily
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K