Commutation relation for Hermitian operators

In summary, in order to show that the commutation relation between Hermitian operators \hat{A}, \hat{B}, and \hat{C} satisfies [\hat{A},\hat{B}]=c\hat{C}, we can take the Hermitian conjugate of the equality and use the properties of Hermitian operators to show that c must be a purely imaginary number.
  • #1
jimmycricket
116
2

Homework Statement


The Hermitian operators [itex]\hat{A},\hat{B},\hat{C}[/itex] satisfy the commutation relation[itex][\hat{A},\hat{B}]=c\hat{C}[/itex].
Show that c is a purely imaginary number.

The Attempt at a Solution



I don't usually post questions without some attempt at an answer but I am at a loss here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
What happens if you take the Hermitian conjugate of that equality?

P.-S.: Don't forget that the homework template has three sections. You should've written down the relevant equations.
 
  • Like
Likes jimmycricket
  • #3
[itex][\hat{A},\hat{B}]^{\dagger}=[\hat{B},\hat{A}]=-[\hat{A},\hat{B}][/itex]
How does this help?
 
  • #4
jimmycricket said:
[itex][\hat{A},\hat{B}]^{\dagger}=[\hat{B},\hat{A}]=-[\hat{A},\hat{B}][/itex]
How does this help?
You forgot the right-hand-side of the original equality.
 
  • Like
Likes jimmycricket
  • #5
[itex][\hat{A},\hat{B}]^{\dagger}=[\hat{B},\hat{A}]=-[\hat{A},\hat{B}]=(c\hat{C})^{\dagger}[/itex]
 
  • #6
jimmycricket said:
[itex][\hat{A},\hat{B}]^{\dagger}=[\hat{B},\hat{A}]=-[\hat{A},\hat{B}]=(c\hat{C})^{\dagger}[/itex]
Continue...
 
  • Like
Likes jimmycricket
  • #7
[itex]
[\hat{A},\hat{B}]^{\dagger}=[\hat{B},\hat{A}]=-[\hat{A},\hat{B}]=(c\hat{C})^{\dagger}=c^{*}\hat{C}^{\dagger}[/itex]
 
  • #8
jimmycricket said:
[itex]
[\hat{A},\hat{B}]^{\dagger}=[\hat{B},\hat{A}]=-[\hat{A},\hat{B}]=(c\hat{C})^{\dagger}=c^{*}\hat{C}^{\dagger}[/itex]
You're almost there. To help you, I'll rewrite what you have there so that it may be more obvious what the last steps are.
$$
\begin{align*}
[\hat{A},\hat{B}]^{\dagger} &=(c\hat{C})^{\dagger} \\
[\hat{B},\hat{A}] &=c^{*}\hat{C}^{\dagger} \\
-[\hat{A},\hat{B}] &=c^{*}\hat{C}^{\dagger}
\end{align*}
$$
 
  • Like
Likes jimmycricket
  • #9
Im still having some trouble seeing where to go from here
 
  • #10
What properties does ##\hat{C}## have? Can you replace the left-hand-side by something else?
 
  • Like
Likes hari_donthi and jimmycricket
  • #11
Ahh ok I think I am there [itex]-[\hat{A},\hat{B}]=(c\hat{C})^{\dagger}=c^{*}\hat{C}^{\dagger}=c^*\hat{C}[/itex] (since C is hermitian)
So we now have [itex]-[\hat{A},\hat{B}]=-c\hat{C}=c^*\hat{C}[/itex]
[tex]\Longrightarrow \frac{c^*}{c}=-1[/tex]
Only pure imaginary numbers satisfy this last condition.
 
  • #12
You got it!
 
  • Like
Likes jimmycricket
  • #13
thanks for your patience and for not giving it away too easily
 

1. What is a commutation relation for Hermitian operators?

A commutation relation for Hermitian operators is a mathematical expression that describes how two Hermitian operators, which represent physical observables in quantum mechanics, interact with each other. It is a fundamental concept in quantum mechanics that helps us understand the behavior and properties of quantum systems.

2. How is a commutation relation expressed mathematically?

A commutation relation is expressed using the commutator, denoted by [A, B], which is defined as [A, B] = AB - BA. This means that the commutator of two operators A and B is equal to the product of the operators, minus the product in the opposite order.

3. What does it mean for two operators to commute?

Two operators are said to commute if their commutator is equal to zero, [A, B] = 0. This means that the order in which the operators are multiplied does not affect the result, and they can be considered to be compatible observables. In other words, they can be measured simultaneously without affecting each other.

4. What is the significance of a commutation relation for Hermitian operators?

The commutation relation for Hermitian operators is crucial in quantum mechanics because it determines the uncertainty in the measurement of two observables. If two operators do not commute, their commutator is non-zero, and this implies that the observables cannot be measured simultaneously with arbitrary precision. This is known as the Heisenberg uncertainty principle.

5. Can the commutation relation be generalized to non-Hermitian operators?

Yes, the concept of commutation relation can be extended to non-Hermitian operators. However, in this case, the commutator is not necessarily equal to zero, and the operators do not commute. This is known as an anti-commutation relation and is commonly used in the study of fermions in quantum mechanics.

Similar threads

  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
29
Views
2K
Back
Top