Compact Sapcetime and Time Travel

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the relationship between compact spacetimes and closed timelike curves (CTCs), exploring theoretical implications and interpretations related to time travel and quantum mechanics. Participants seek references and delve into the nature of particles and antiparticles in the context of these concepts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that any compact spacetime must contain closed timelike curves, seeking references for this assertion.
  • One participant proposes that a particle traveling in a closed geodesic could be interpreted as an antiparticle moving in the opposite direction in time, suggesting a connection to quantum mechanics and particle-antiparticle pairs.
  • Another participant mentions that closed loops in compact spacetime could lead to interpretations of energy being created and destroyed from the perspective of observers within that spacetime.
  • A participant clarifies that while antimatter appears to mimic normal matter traveling backward in time, it is actually traveling forward in time.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on the interpretations of closed timelike curves or the implications of compact spacetimes. Multiple competing views and interpretations remain present in the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various sources and literature, including works by Hawking, Ellis, Naber, and Wald, but the discussion does not resolve the underlying assumptions or implications of these references.

thehangedman
Messages
68
Reaction score
2
Someone here once said to me, via post, that "any compact spacetime must have closed timelike curves". Are there any good references out there on why that is / how that is derived?

As an after thought...

Isn't it true that a particle traveling in one direction in time is equivalent to its anti-particle traveling in the opposite direction in time? So, for a closed geodesic in a compact space-time, a particle traveling in this "loop" would appear the same to us as a particle and anti-particle popping out of the void and then coming back together again and disappearing no? As the particle comes around and travels back in time, we would interpret that (or at least the equations make it equivalent to) as it's anti particle moving forward in time.

I would think that a closed universe, in space and time, would allow for regions of time where energy would be isolated. If we could look at this universe from the outside, as we do say looking at the surface of the Earth (a closed 2d example), we would see that on the whole energy is conserved. But if time to those on the surface is like the motions from the south pole to the north (big bang, big crunch), they would see energy being "created" and then "destroyed".
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Thank you for that link, and I will look into this more. From my comments after my question though I think this issue can be solved. It seams to me that QM addresses this and that these closed loops can be interpreted as I said. Put simply, any CTC would be the equivalent to the popping in and out of particle anti-particle pairs from the void. Or, put another way, this feature of the void is actually the direct result of a compact space-time.
 
Sorry, but for some reason I don't see any images / sketches showing up. :-(
 
thehangedman said:
Isn't it true that a particle traveling in one direction in time is equivalent to its anti-particle traveling in the opposite direction in time?

Actually, from what I've been told, antimatter travels forwards in time. Its state mimics that of normal matter traveling backwards in time, but the particle itself travels forwards in time.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 95 ·
4
Replies
95
Views
7K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K