Compact sets are covered by finitely many epsilon disks

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves proving that a compact subset K of a metric space (X, d) can be covered by finitely many epsilon neighborhoods. The focus is on understanding the implications of compactness in relation to open covers and epsilon neighborhoods.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the necessity of showing that epsilon neighborhoods cover K and the implications of compactness leading to a finite subcover. Questions arise about how to define epsilon and the generality of the proof.

Discussion Status

Some participants affirm the approach of using compactness to argue for a finite subcover. Others express uncertainty about defining epsilon and seek clarification on its application in the proof.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on ensuring the proof is valid for any epsilon, reflecting on previous discussions about defining epsilon in various contexts.

redone632
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let K be a compact sebset of a metric space (X, d) and let \epsilon greater than 0.
Prove that there exists finitely many points x_1 x_2, ... x_n \in K such that K is a subset of the union of the \epsilon neighborhoods about x_i


Homework Equations


N/A


The Attempt at a Solution



I think all I need to show is that all of the neighborhood epsilon disks about all the x's cover K and since K is is a compact set then finitely many of these neighborhoods cover K. If that is the correct approach then I'm just not sure how to start it. We didn't do any examples of proving that a certain set covers another.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, that is the right approach. A space is compact if every open cover has a finite subcover. Take a cover of K by <br /> \epsilon<br /> balls. If you assume there does not exist fintely many <br /> x_1 x_2, ... x_n \in K<br /> such that K is a subset of the union of the <br /> \epsilon<br /> neighborhoods about <br /> x_i<br />, then this is an open cover without a finite subcover.
 
Alright, but how do I go about defining my epsilons to be?
 
the proof should be sound for any epsilon
 
Last edited:
lanedance said:
the proof should be sound for any epsilon

That's what I thought. We've just been dealing with defining epsilon so much I want to be sure. I'll go over my notes to see if I can come up with something. Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
560
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K