Compact support of matter fields

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between asymptotic boundary conditions of matter fields and the Riemann tensor in spacetime. It clarifies that "having compact support" means matter fields vanish outside a finite region, while stating they go to zero at infinity is a weaker condition. The Ricci tensor will have compact support if the matter fields do, but this does not apply to the Riemann tensor, which typically falls off but does not vanish entirely. In three dimensions, however, compactly supported matter fields do imply that the Riemann tensor also has compact support. The conversation highlights the frequent misuse of the term "compact support" in discussions about asymptotic behavior.
haushofer
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
3,065
Reaction score
1,586
Hi,

I have a question concerning the asymptotic boundary conditions on matter fields and the Riemann tensor. What is the precise relation between saying that "the matter fields go to zero at spatial infinity" and "the matter fields have compact support"? And how natural is it to state that the Riemann tensor has "compact support" on a certain spacetime? I would say that if the matter fields have compact support, the Riemann tensor also has, right?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It seems to me that people often abuse the concept of "having compact support" whenever they actually mean a certain asymptotic behaviour. Can anyone comment on this?
 
To say that the matter fields have compact support means that their intersection with a Cauchy surface has compact support in the mathematical sense. This is usually used loosely to mean that all matter fields (exactly) vanish outside of some finite spatial region. Saying that the matter fields fall off at some rate near infinity is therefore a weaker condition.

Einstein's equation implies that the Ricci tensor will have compact support if the matter fields do. The same is not true of the Riemann tensor. It will usually fall off at some rate as one moves away from the matter, but there is no radius beyond which it will vanish.
 
Ok, thanks! But in three dimensions compactly supported matter fields then do imply that the Riemann tensor has compact support, right?
 
Yes, that's right.
 
In an inertial frame of reference (IFR), there are two fixed points, A and B, which share an entangled state $$ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0>_A|1>_B+|1>_A|0>_B) $$ At point A, a measurement is made. The state then collapses to $$ |a>_A|b>_B, \{a,b\}=\{0,1\} $$ We assume that A has the state ##|a>_A## and B has ##|b>_B## simultaneously, i.e., when their synchronized clocks both read time T However, in other inertial frames, due to the relativity of simultaneity, the moment when B has ##|b>_B##...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K