Comparing 1000m Race Velocities: Runner 1 vs Runner 2

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the comparison of two runners' velocities in a 1000m race, where Runner 1 has a slightly higher average speed than Runner 2, calculated at 6.76 m/s and 6.75 m/s, respectively. Despite this, the question arises about the fairness of the race if the track lengths differ, particularly if L2 is longer than L1. Participants debate the implications of track curvature and how it affects performance, suggesting that the inner track may provide an advantage. The conclusion drawn is that if L2 exceeds L1 by more than 1.35 meters, Runner 1's victory may not be considered fair. The discussion emphasizes the need for precise measurements and considerations of track conditions to determine true performance outcomes.
  • #31
jbriggs444 said:
You may be over-thinking this.
Isn’t this what physics is about😨?
We are overthinker and that’s a hurdle in solving simple problems.
 
  • Like
Likes Steve4Physics
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
rudransh verma said:
Isn’t this what physics is about😨?
We are overthinker and that’s a hurdle in solving simple problems.
Just to clarify something (if clarification is needed)…

My post #28 (about the possibility that the tracks are in different inertial frames of reference) was supposed to be a joke! (Well, I thought it was funny.)

It was intended to be a humorous illustration of what happens when overthinking goes too far. But maybe it failed!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
10K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
699