Comparison between two Tippe tops

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the comparison of two tippe tops with different masses and their spinning behavior. It argues that the tippe top with smaller mass will achieve a higher angular velocity and spin on its stem first, while the heavier top will stop spinning sooner due to greater energy loss from friction. Critics point out that the initial argument lacks clarity on how quickly the transition to spinning on the stem occurs and emphasize the need for a more rigorous mathematical approach. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding friction and energy dynamics in determining the behavior of spinning tops. Overall, the conclusions drawn about the spinning dynamics require a deeper examination of the underlying physics.
abrahamabraham
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Given two Tippe top (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tippe_top) that are made of the same material. The mass (and weight) of the first one is 2 times greater than the second. Given they have the same initial energy. Which of them will spin on its narrow stem first, and which of them will stop first (due to friction and energy loss)? This is a question I invented.
Relevant Equations
Please help me if there are any relevant equations.
I think that the second tippe top will spin on its stem first, and the first tippe top will stop spinning first due to its greater mass and lower angular velocity. Here are my ideas:

  • They are given the same initial energy. By the conservation of energy principle, an object with greater mass would have lower angular velocity than one with smaller mass, if their initial energies are the same.
  • For a tippe top to spin on its narrow stem, it needs to attain a critical angular velocity to overcome the friction at the point of contact.
  • The one with smaller mass (the second tippe top) would attain a higher angular velocity compared to the one with greater mass, given they have the same initial energy.
  • Therefore, the second tippe top (with smaller mass) will spin on its narrow stem first.
  • Additionally, the top with greater mass would lose energy to friction faster compared to the one with smaller mass, since its angular velocity is lower.
  • Therefore, the first tippe top (with greater mass) will stop spinning due to friction and energy loss sooner than the second tippe top.

    Am I right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
abrahamabraham said:
They are given the same initial energy. By the conservation of energy principle, an object with greater mass would have lower angular velocity than one with smaller mass, if their initial energies are the same.
The conclusion is true, but it has nothing to do with energy conservation.
abrahamabraham said:
For a tippe top to spin on its narrow stem, it needs to attain a critical angular velocity to overcome the friction at the point of contact.
The friction at point of contact is what leads to standing on the stem. How does it present a barrier to be overcome?
abrahamabraham said:
  • The one with smaller mass (the second tippe top) would attain a higher angular velocity compared to the one with greater mass, given they have the same initial energy.
  • Therefore, the second tippe top (with smaller mass) will spin on its narrow stem first.
You do not offer any reason that the process would be faster. Even if your preceding point were correct, it only says there is a critical energy per unit mass for it to reach the upright position. It says nothing about how quickly it happens.
abrahamabraham said:
  • Additionally, the top with greater mass would lose energy to friction faster compared to the one with smaller mass, since its angular velocity is lower.
I would have thought that the one with slower spin would slide a shorter distance against the surface in a given time, so lose energy more slowly.
abrahamabraham said:
  • Therefore, the first tippe top (with greater mass) will stop spinning due to friction and energy loss sooner than the second tippe top.

    Am I right?
I don't see that you can reach an answer to this question by such handwaving. You need to deal with the equations.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top