Comparison of DFB edge emitting laser vs. VCSEL

Mindscrape
Messages
1,854
Reaction score
1
Does anyone know of an article that has a good in-depth, side by side comparison of DFB edge emitting lasers and VCSEL lasers? From my research it seems to me that the VCSEL papers are all trying to justify why laser production should shift towards VCSEL, and mostly list the advantages over an edge emitting laser; and, conversely, the edge emitting articles are all focused on some new improvement in edge emitting lasers and not competing with VCSEL. So, I'm trying myself to figure out the pros and cons between the two, but it would be great to have something reinforce what I've come up with.

Up until this point I've really only known crystal lasers, so I already know the general concepts of lasers, and I figured it's about time for me to get some knowledge in semiconductor lasers. I started with the basic Fabry-Perot edge emitting laser, and now learning about DFB and VCSEL lasers. I feel like a total laser noob right now. :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
These two reference articles describe each type, and also describe some differences:
http://www.rp-photonics.com/distributed_feedback_lasers.html
http://www.rp-photonics.com/vertical_cavity_surface_emitting_lasers.html

What you need is a review paper which includes both DFB and VCSEL lasers. A Google search found:
http://orbit.dtu.dk/en/publications...502e-ca61-4968-8a88-51085e4befce)/export.html

There were more on Google Scholar.

This industrial application article may also be helpful:
http://zone.ni.com/devzone/cda/ph/p/id/125
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
9K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
9K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Back
Top