Comparison of Riemann integral to accumulation function

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that for an increasing function f on the interval [0,1], the inequality (1/x)∫₀ˣ f(t) dt ≤ ∫₀¹ f(t) dt holds for all x in (0,1]. The user explores various approaches, including considering upper and lower sums and the implications of f being strictly increasing. They deduce that the average value of f over [0,x] is less than that over [0,1], leading to the conclusion that the left-hand side of the inequality is bounded by the right-hand side. Despite making progress, the user expresses uncertainty about connecting their findings to the original inequality. The conversation highlights the nuances of integrating increasing functions and the challenges in establishing the desired inequalities.
TopCat
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
Let f:[0,1]→ℝ be an increasing function. Show that for all x in (0,1],

\frac{1}{x}\int_{0}^{x}f (t) \,dt \le \int_{0}^{1}f (t) \,dt


So by working backwards I got to trying to show that (1-x)\int_{0}^{1}f (t) \,dt \le \int_{x}^{1}f (t) \,dt. While I know both sides are equal at x=1, the LHS is decreasing, and the RHS is continuous, I haven't been able to find a reason to say the inequality is true (probably nothing there).

Should I pass to considering upper and lower sums, or is there some fancy way to use integration by parts here? I haven't come across anything compelling in all my random scratch work.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
how about something like this...

f is increasing so
f(a)<f(b) for all a<b (strictly increasing?)

now say f(x) = c, can you show
(1-x)c&lt;\int_x^1 f(t) dt
\int_0^x f(t) dt &lt; xc

the second gives
\frac{1}{x}\int_0^x f(t) dt &lt; c
 
Last edited:
also it may help to think of it like this

\frac{1}{x}\int_{0}^{x}f (t) \,dt is the average value of the function over the interval [0,x]

\int_{0}^{1}f (t) \,dt is the average value of the function over the interval [0,1]

As the function is increasing, so will its average increase over a larger interval
 
Thanks for the intuition. Now I was able to easily get the inequality

\frac{1}{x}\int^{x}_{0}f\,dt \le \frac{1}{1-x}\int^{1}_{x}f\,dt

but I'm not sure how that can show the LHS ≤ \int^{1}_{0}f\,dt. I'm sure I'm being blind and missing something super obvious. :(
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K