News Compassion versus Military Action - Which Will End Global Terrorism?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pattylou
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Global Military
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the implications of U.S. foreign policy, particularly regarding Iran and the potential for military action. Participants express concerns about the reliability of intelligence and the rationale behind preemptive strikes, questioning whether such actions genuinely protect American lives or merely escalate tensions. The debate highlights differing perceptions of terrorism, the effectiveness of aggressive foreign policies, and the moral implications of collateral damage in military conflicts. Some argue that preemptive actions could alienate global support, while others believe they are necessary to deter threats from regimes perceived as aggressive. The conversation also touches on the historical context of Islamic expansionism and the complexities of democratization in the Middle East, with participants debating the potential consequences of U.S. actions on regional stability and the broader fight against terrorism. Overall, the thread reflects deep divides in opinion on how best to approach national security and international relations in the face of perceived threats.
  • #51
***Just a reminder to everyone, please try to address the content of what the user has posted and refrain from personal opinions of the poster.*** Slinging mud, cheap shots, and snide remarks will put you on the road towards a ban here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #52
Bile said:
I hardly think it's bile to fear that Bush might be crazy enough to use nukes without real provocation.

This is lunacy. And anyone who really thinks this is a lunatic.

The only way its not lunacy is maybe if we have a diagreement
about what constitutes a valid provocation. Ok.

But to think he would actually use nukes without provocation is
is to ascribe a depravitry to the man which is out of all touch with reality.

Sorry if this is perceived as personal- it's not.
 
  • #53
Antiphon said:
This is lunacy. And anyone who really thinks this is a lunatic.

The only way its not lunacy is maybe if we have a diagreement
about what constitutes a valid provocation. Ok.

But to think he would actually use nukes without provocation is
is to ascribe a depravitry to the man which is out of all touch with reality.

Sorry if this is perceived as personal- it's not.
Like the 'valid provocation' he claimed to justify his attack on Iraq? It would seem Bush is very much out of touch with reality. The problem with Bush as with other neocons is they speak with God too much. Nothing wrong with that in itself but I fear Bush thinks God talks back to him. :biggrin:
 
  • #54
Uniter not a divider

There is a lot of political critical mass boiling here. As far as any action against Iran goes look at the facts.

In 2004 China and Iran signed a $75 billion dollar oil deal that allows China to develop one of Iran's major oil fields.

China needs oil that's a given. They tried to buy Unocal but were met with too much political opposition. YET:

China holds over $200 billion dollars in U.S. treasury bills. We have to keep selling T-bills to China to finance the war in Iraq.

American companies have been allowed to move the production of products to China that we cannot live without. (everything from can openers to electronic equipment *read some labels)

China has a trade surplus with the U.S. of over $650 billion dollars.

Any military action by either the USA or Israel is going to be opposed by China and at the current time China is holding all of the cards, and the toys, and the microwave ovens, and the coffee makers, and the air conditioners, and the clothing, and just try to find a consumer item that is not made in China.

As far as Iran's ability to build a nuclear weapon goes, they don't even need the blasted nuclear power plants. if they use the centrifuges (supplied by Halliburton along with technical help from Pakistan) and a supply of raw materials, they can build nukes anyway.

So what happens next? Absolutely nothing but big talk and big threats from big mouth politicians. :bugeye:
 
Last edited:
  • #55
Antiphon said:
This is lunacy. And anyone who really thinks this is a lunatic.

The only way its not lunacy is maybe if we have a diagreement
about what constitutes a valid provocation. Ok.

But to think he would actually use nukes without provocation is
is to ascribe a depravitry to the man which is out of all touch with reality.

Sorry if this is perceived as personal- it's not.
Then what is the program that now has the USA persuing mini-nukes:
Mini Nukes
Reporter: Graham Phillips
Producer: Graham Phillips
Researcher: Paul Grocott

20 May 2004
A new generation of nuclear weapons – mini nukes is being planned by America. According to the US military, they need miniature nukes in the war against terrorism So they’re designing bunker busting weapons that can burrow down into the Earth carrying a mini- nuke which would wipe out some rogue dictator’s control centre or destroy stores of chemical and biological weapons. And the military says, because these mini-nuke bunker busters will go off underground, the nuclear fall out from them will never escape. But the mini nukes have a lot of critics amongst them physicist Richard Slakey who says they won’t be able to burrow deep enough and more worryingly that the radiation fallout cannot be contained.
http://www.abc.net.au/cgi-bin/common/printfriendly.pl?/catalyst/stories/s1112492.htm

You do remember the Bunker buster that came down in the market in Iraq?

What they seem reluctant to use is an ICBM.

This does not mean they are averse to using nukes.
 
  • #56
The Smoking Man said:
Then what is the program that now has the USA persuing mini-nukes:
http://www.abc.net.au/cgi-bin/common/printfriendly.pl?/catalyst/stories/s1112492.htm

You do remember the Bunker buster that came down in the market in Iraq?

What they seem reluctant to use is an ICBM.

This does not mean they are averse to using nukes.
No doubt as they did with napalm they'll 'relaunch' it with a new brand name so they can then deny using nukes.
 
  • #57
Mini Nukes

This reminds me of the good old days back during the cold war when both the USA and Russia had nukes small enough to be carried in a backpack. I wonder what ever happened to all of those little nukettes.
 
  • #58
Antiphon said:
This is lunacy. And anyone who really thinks this is a lunatic.

The only way its not lunacy is maybe if we have a diagreement
about what constitutes a valid provocation. Ok.

But to think he would actually use nukes without provocation is
is to ascribe a depravitry to the man which is out of all touch with reality.
Art is right. If maybe (but not really) possessing weapons of mass destruction and being a "dictator" are the only criteria used by the Bush administration, then I definitely can't rule out the possibility. These criteria, which appear to have been the ones used in Iraq, are certainly enough to justify, in this administration's collective mind, the invasion of North Korea and Iran. An attack on either of these countries carries the well-known threat of nuclear war. Thus, attacking either of these countries except at actual, great, need is really a conscious decision to begin nuclear war.

Sorry if this is perceived as personal- it's not.
Not a personal attack? This may have been a mistake on your part, but you wrote "Originally posted by Bile..." :wink:
 
  • #59
Antiphon said:
Then you haven't heard much from those who are well informed about the history
of Islam. The Arabian peninsula was Roman Catholic before it was Muslim. So was Constantinople
before Muslims sacked it and renamed it Istanbul. Their next goal is Europe, to be followed by the US.
let's stop right here... there is this huge misunderstanding that started when this whole fiasco began. When we see HOLY WAR, some people tend to think that this war is based on beliefs as to wipe out a religion. This makes no sense at all to a normal human being. Strategically, there is no prize in making a war over such a thing. This is a war of beliefs perhaps against CAPITALISM. George Soros has deflated and collapsed economies by flipping currency. America runs many parts of the Universe that humans have the ability to control(this includes space). I'm not antiAmerican, but I can see how a country or group of individuals would get upset watching this occur. Perhaps 911, in their opinion, was a pre-emptive attack? Warning shots? I'm just saying this so ANTIPHON may possibly see an alternative perspective.

antiphon said:
I'm sorry you see this. I see an aggressive expansionist religion whose violent
advocates justify any means to achive it's expansion and have sworn to
obliterate all of Western civilzation because it stands in their way.
if it is possible for you to turn the table around, I think it is America which is trying to expand across the globe. Globalization & the UN are based on American ideals.

Yes, these are good... but you don't realize that if you bring this down a notch... we can look at another scenerio closer to home:

let's see... as a conservative righty, you don't want change in your country... This idea of weak Freedom of expression/ Gay tofu munching fags mentality is going to run the country down the toilet. You hate how they think everything is so happy and easy. They're all over the internet and I hear they are on their way to your town... A wall of "fags" start marching to your house to save your son (who doesn't yet know he's a fag)... and if you have a daughter all the bisexual fags are coming to get her... What do you do?

you fire a warning shot... they tell the cops... the cops do nothing because it's your house... so they move in anyway because somehow, they know your son is gay and your daughter is horny :)

Your son/(daughter) loves it! :smile: All the lefties start making propoganda saying how much your son/daughter loved it and your son/daughter even stands infront of a camera and SX DX saying.. Hi Mom.. look no hands! Perhaps they used weapons to force compliance, but the news says that Gay is the Way! How would you feel about that? Helpless father... who couldn't protect his own family from leftist beliefs. You are a failure.

To summarize if you didn't read carefully: Rightists in America = Terrorists and the Lefties = George & Co. Unfortunately it seems like it takes a lefty to see the real big picture. IMO some people with certain beliefs have a larger brain capacity or something... seriously o:)
antiphon said:
I'd need to know who they were before I rendered a specific judgment about
them. The loss of innocnet life is greivous. The loss of Jihadi fighters is
a numerical and strategic success.
unfortunately, you have it backwards. I tend to attribute most things GWB says to being HIS plan of attack and reasoning. I'm always wondering how he and his group have so much insight on the opponent. Don't tell me that it is some kinda intelligence agency... if it were that, they would have been able to plan a real attack to snuff out the candle in one shot rather than fanning a feather at it.
antiphon said:
I'm dissapointed to see you skewer your own argument above about relying
on bad intelligence. Apparently it's ok for you to rely on it when it tells you
what you want to hear.
did your daddy teach you that? :rolleyes: if there is any proper intelligence coming back to the Bush Admin, it is getting skewed before it gets released... trust a guy who used to write press releases (yes that's me)

Fear is different from knowing the score and spelling it out like it is. It
doesn't matter to me whether I am killed by a heart attack or an Iranian
nuke. But it matters greatly to me that the world not be taken over by
that particular death-cult.
like maybe the NAZIs related to GWB & Family and Arnie, the last action hero?
antiphon said:
Pattylou, I honestly don't want to frighten you.
I honestly think you do... but I, also, don't think it worked :-p
antiphon said:
Time and time again, the clarion call of the frightened has been to sue
for peace in the face of agression. This is a losing strategy.
Let, me tell you this BUDDY, I was probably a bigger bully than you will ever hope to be... I learned to think... and I think YOU have the losing strategy. People who are against war are not all too weak or afraid to fight. They understand that fighting does not trump anything. It is the lowest common denominator. When you go to kindergarten, the teacher teaches all kids not to fight. C'mon! I would have you by the neck...(haha.. you loved that didn't you?... that's the game you think you could win... I bet you not... you love the way I challenge you and get your blood boiling mad... but you have no idea that it only puts you right where I want you... So you have no idea what you would be up against, would you? so don't do it.

Children learn to get along, why can't adults?

Antiphon, please take whatever degree you have and eat it... *passes bbq sauce* You are going back to kindergarten! I will be your Kindergarten Cop :smile: and you are going to love it :devil:
 
Last edited:
  • #60
btw... ANTIPHON, it says in your Location: Above the Fray... I believe you all "all up in there"... so you are also among the hypocritical... you certainly are right.
 
  • #61
edward said:
There is a lot of political critical mass boiling here. As far as any action against Iran goes look at the facts.

In 2004 China and Iran signed a $75 billion dollar oil deal that allows China to develop one of Iran's major oil fields.

China needs oil that's a given. They tried to buy Unocal but were met with too much political opposition. YET:

China holds over $200 billion dollars in U.S. treasury bills. We have to keep selling T-bills to China to finance the war in Iraq.

American companies have been allowed to move the production of products to China that we cannot live without. (everything from can openers to electronic equipment *read some labels)

China has a trade surplus with the U.S. of over $650 billion dollars.

Any military action by either the USA or Israel is going to be opposed by China and at the current time China is holding all of the cards, and the toys, and the microwave ovens, and the coffee makers, and the air conditioners, and the clothing, and just try to find a consumer item that is not made in China.

As far as Iran's ability to build a nuclear weapon goes, they don't even need the blasted nuclear power plants. if they use the centrifuges (supplied by Halliburton along with technical help from Pakistan) and a supply of raw materials, they can build nukes anyway.

So what happens next? Absolutely nothing but big talk and big threats from big mouth politicians. :bugeye:
WOW! Thank You Edward...
The only thing about a debt is that you can decide to not pay it. I don't know if China realizes how worthless those Tbills are if US decides they have enough arms and spaceships to save the significant and just let everyone split the bill. Yes this way of thinking does take a leap.. but space... the final frontier... these are the voyages... yeah I'll stop now.

The guy who borrows all the money... has all the money... who is going to take it from him?
 
  • #62
outsider said:
WOW! Thank You Edward...
The only thing about a debt is that you can decide to not pay it. I don't know if China realizes how worthless those Tbills are if US decides they have enough arms and spaceships to save the significant and just let everyone split the bill. Yes this way of thinking does take a leap.. but space... the final frontier... these are the voyages... yeah I'll stop now.

The guy who borrows all the money... has all the money... who is going to take it from him?
The rest of the world when they revalue the dollar to the level of the Lira.
 
  • #63
The Smoking Man said:
The rest of the world when they revalue the dollar to the level of the Lira.
in your opinion, how likely is that?
 
  • #64
on their current course, unavoidable.
 
  • #65
The scenario for a war against Iran goes like this.

Scare the American people again, maybe another terror attack. Link it to Iran.

Now because our conventional force are still bogged down in Iraq, and since Iran has a real army, we start by Strtegically nuking power plants, cities, and evereything else except the oil fields. Then we can move in and have a much smaller population, therefore a much smaller insurgency. This way Haliburton and Chevron can maximize profits.

This may be simplistic but just remember who is the president is.
 
  • #66
Skyhunter said:
The scenario for a war against Iran goes like this.

Scare the American people again, maybe another terror attack. Link it to Iran.

Now because our conventional force are still bogged down in Iraq, and since Iran has a real army, we start by Strtegically nuking power plants, cities, and evereything else except the oil fields. Then we can move in and have a much smaller population, therefore a much smaller insurgency. This way Haliburton and Chevron can maximize profits.

This may be simplistic but just remember who is the president is.
how were you able to come up with this ingenius plan?
 
  • #67
outsider said:
in your opinion, how likely is that?
Extremely likely.

The world has so far switched about 20% of their holdings from USD to EUROS.

You've made a LOT of bad decisions over the decades since the world declared the dollar to be the world currency and there has been a massive switch out of the fear the currency has no backing.
 
  • #68
outsider said:
how were you able to come up with this ingenius plan?
Read the news.

The big lie is being concocted already.

We have gone from announcements of Iran and Iraq making peace with one another and working co-operatively to fight terrorism to announcements of arms shipments and insinuations that the Iraqis are dragging their heels on the constitution and putting too much of their religion into it.

Both countries are being condemned for making ovations of peace.
 
  • #69
The Smoking Man said:
Extremely likely.

The world has so far switched about 20% of their holdings from USD to EUROS.

You've made a LOT of bad decisions over the decades since the world declared the dollar to be the world currency and there has been a massive switch out of the fear the currency has no backing.
Mostly since 2000...and if you look at this possibility in conjunction with new ties between various countries, such as Iran with China and Russia (as I think you mentioned previously) it should be quite disconcerting to Americans. But no, we continue our record spending (energy bill, highway bill) our poor trade agreements (CAFTA), and of course a foreign policy of aggression.
 
  • #70
outsider said:
WOW! Thank You Edward...
The only thing about a debt is that you can decide to not pay it. I don't know if China realizes how worthless those Tbills are if US decides they have enough arms and spaceships to save the significant and just let everyone split the bill. Yes this way of thinking does take a leap.. but space... the final frontier... these are the voyages... yeah I'll stop now.

The guy who borrows all the money... has all the money... who is going to take it from him?

The U.S. will never have enough arms and spaceships, especially arms. If we don't have the arms China will send their repo man. If we want to build more arms to prevent this ... we sell more T- Bills to China.

All China has to do is stop all shipments of goods to the USA. In six months we will be on our knees. We no longer have factories that make consumer goods, or haven't you noticed.
 
  • #71
edward said:
The U.S. will never have enough arms and spaceships, especially arms. If we don't have the arms China will send their repo man. If we want to build more arms to prevent this ... we sell more T- Bills to China.

All China has to do is stop all shipments of goods to the USA. In six months we will be on our knees. We no longer have factories that make consumer goods, or haven't you noticed.
The loss of Chia-Pets and Pocket Fishermen alone would be crippling!

I wonder if they do cappodemente here?
 
  • #72
edward said:
The U.S. will never have enough arms and spaceships, especially arms. If we don't have the arms China will send their repo man. If we want to build more arms to prevent this ... we sell more T- Bills to China.

All China has to do is stop all shipments of goods to the USA. In six months we will be on our knees. We no longer have factories that make consumer goods, or haven't you noticed.
we only need food, shelter, and love to be healthy human beings... everything else is really a novelty... America is packed up with crap... why do you think ebay is so successful?
 
  • #73
outsider said:
we only need food, shelter, and love to be healthy human beings... everything else is really a novelty... America is packed up with crap... why do you think ebay is so successful?


OK let's start with food, all toasters, toaster ovens, microwave ovens, Blenders, food processors, and most cooking utensils ie skillets pots pans etc. are now made in China.

Need shelter: Run down to the Home Depot and buy some lumber and a box of nails quick. OH OH the nails are made in China, we need to get some super glue.

If we could be happy living in home made tents (the commercial ones are made in China) and eating Cambells soup heated over an open flame in grandpa's antique shaving mug we could get by. :-p :-p
 
  • #74
edward said:
OK let's start with food, all toasters, toaster ovens, microwave ovens, Blenders, food processors, and most cooking utensils ie skillets pots pans etc. are now made in China.

Need shelter: Run down to the Home Depot and buy some lumber and a box of nails quick. OH OH the nails are made in China, we need to get some super glue.

If we could be happy living in home made tents (the commercial ones are made in China) and eating Cambells soup heated over an open flame in grandpa's antique shaving mug we could get by. :-p :-p
Good un. You're preaching to the choir here. I'm the one who says Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs is a matter of national security. If you look at economic statistics now, you'll see that sectors such as manufacturing are in the toilet. I'll check out the thread on out-sourcing...
 
  • #75
Getting back on topic.

It will require a combination of military action and compassion. Let's face it, the terrorist's that are already hard core are not going to go through a change of conscience simply because we are more compassionate and understanding.

The best way to reduce the number of future terrorist is a more equitable distribution of the worlds resources. If people are fed and happy and see that others they care for are fed and happy, they are less likely to strap on a bomb and blow themselves up in a subway.

It will not be easy, but the idea that we can coax all the terrorists into Iraq and fight them there is just ludicrous.
 
  • #76
Skyhunter said:
Getting back on topic.

It will require a combination of military action and compassion. Let's face it, the terrorist's that are already hard core are not going to go through a change of conscience simply because we are more compassionate and understanding.
Really?

You know that for a fact?

When was this ever tried?
 
  • #77
The Smoking Man said:
Really?

You know that for a fact?
Of course I don't know this for a fact. It is my opinion.

I do believe that there is a point of no return. I believe there are some who would have a change of conscience and others who would not.

My point is that if they are actively engaged in terrorism, have been thoroughly trained and brainwashed, they are not likely to have a change of heart.
The Smoking Man said:
When was this ever tried?
Good point. Never as far as I know.
 
  • #78
edward said:
OK let's start with food, all toasters, toaster ovens, microwave ovens, Blenders, food processors, and most cooking utensils ie skillets pots pans etc. are now made in China.

Need shelter: Run down to the Home Depot and buy some lumber and a box of nails quick. OH OH the nails are made in China, we need to get some super glue.

If we could be happy living in home made tents (the commercial ones are made in China) and eating Cambells soup heated over an open flame in grandpa's antique shaving mug we could get by. :-p :-p
LOL :smile: ... these are all true... what about the glut of product? If we already have it, the need to buy a new one is a WANT and not a NEED. Theres plenty of old junk on ebay, swap meets, and garage sales... America will not tumble due to lack of consumer products... as long as we have agriculture, we can learn to adapt. Give us a reason to start from scratch and create jobs all over again? no? :cool:
 
  • #79
outsider said:
LOL :smile: ... these are all true... what about the glut of product? If we already have it, the need to buy a new one is a WANT and not a NEED. Theres plenty of old junk on ebay, swap meets, and garage sales... America will not tumble due to lack of consumer products... as long as we have agriculture, we can learn to adapt. Give us a reason to start from scratch and create jobs all over again? no? :cool:
Do you know that this will put you at the level of Cuba during the embargo? That's why they have such neet cars from the 1950's there.

One problem with the stuff you have though ... it was probably built recently and due to planned obsolesence, will only last about another 6 months.
 
  • #80
Skyhunter said:
Of course I don't know this for a fact. It is my opinion.

I do believe that there is a point of no return. I believe there are some who would have a change of conscience and others who would not.

My point is that if they are actively engaged in terrorism, have been thoroughly trained and brainwashed, they are not likely to have a change of heart.

Good point. Never as far as I know.
I'd hate to agree with this, but some people are trained from birth to be killers... for them, there is no normalcy (as we know it) or understanding of compassion. They are nothing more than human droids (soldiers for life). Very sad :frown: a whole generation of these soldiers must pass... unless they are subjected to further brainwashing.

TSM, it will take a lot of education... IMO, proper martial arts training would support this understanding. But I agree, too, that we have to start somewhere.
 
  • #81
The Smoking Man said:
Do you know that this will put you at the level of Cuba during the embargo? That's why they have such neet cars from the 1950's there.

One problem with the stuff you have though ... it was probably built recently and due to planned obsolesence, will only last about another 6 months.
Well, Cuba is a nice place (so I hear). And perhaps we will have to revert back to some basic lifestyles, this may encourage technology to make several advances toward a less consumer driven, media hungry society? Efficient use of supplies and personal responsibility... the propoganda could be (to the effect of): "contribute to the country by using less".

I'm still a wishful thinker... but the definition of stupidity - doing the same thing over and over... (yeah, you know the rest).
 
  • #82
outsider said:
I'd hate to agree with this, but some people are trained from birth to be killers... for them, there is no normalcy (as we know it) or understanding of compassion. They are nothing more than human droids (soldiers for life). Very sad :frown: a whole generation of these soldiers must pass... unless they are subjected to further brainwashing.
Rrrrriiiight. The Iraqui insurgents have been trained from birth to fight America.

outsider said:
TSM, it will take a lot of education... IMO, proper martial arts training would support this understanding. But I agree, too, that we have to start somewhere.
Oh joy, I was a martial arts teacher for 20 years. What would you like to know?
 
  • #83
outsider said:
Well, Cuba is a nice place (so I hear). And perhaps we will have to revert back to some basic lifestyles, this may encourage technology to make several advances toward a less consumer driven, media hungry society? Efficient use of supplies and personal responsibility... the propoganda could be (to the effect of): "contribute to the country by using less".
:smile: For some reason I forsee a much less... 'happy' result from a Chinese embargo on the US.
 
  • #84
Smurf said:
:smile: For some reason I forsee a much less... 'happy' result from a Chinese embargo on the US.
I'm not saying that it would be easy...
 
  • #85
The Smoking Man said:
Rrrrriiiight. The Iraqui insurgents have been trained from birth to fight America.
well, if you were born to war, and all you live everyday is war... then war is what you know... what other options do they have?
Oh joy, I was a martial arts teacher for 20 years. What would you like to know?
Don't you train people to be stronger, but not abuse the power? how do you maintain that people remain responsible with their abilities?
 
  • #86
Skyhunter said:
I do believe that there is a point of no return. I believe there are some who would have a change of conscience and others who would not.

My point is that if they are actively engaged in terrorism, have been thoroughly trained and brainwashed, they are not likely to have a change of heart.

Good point. Never as far as I know.
Funnily enough it has been tried and what's more it even worked. Ref the Provisional IRA.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #87
outsider said:
well, if you were born to war, and all you live everyday is war... then war is what you know... what other options do they have?
Okay, if you find someone who's lived everyday at war, someone who hasn't ached for home when away fighting, someone who doesn't know that there's anything else to life... Well, get them laid for starts, that might open their eyes. Everyone can always learn new things.
 
  • #88
I read the article

pattylou said:
Hey kat,

I still don't have an axe to grind, but I saw a report that I found really chilling just now and it applies directly to you comment about an attack on Iran:


Check the link.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=20050802&articleId=791

I thought I would post it for anyone's interest that is following along. I don't know how reliable the assertion is, that Cheney is asking for attack plans, and I don't know how reliable the group is that reported this.

Of course there is the argument that we need to have plans ready for any contingency... But the subtext of the report sounds a lot more ominous than that. Why is a nuclear response on Tehran being proposed a priori for another terrorist attack from any comer? Wouldn't we analyze a terrorist attack afterwards, and best decide how to respond, depending on who perpetrated the attack, for example?

I hesitated posting this, because I don't want to "get into it." But then, I am frankly curious for your honest reaction to the report. Take off your conservative hat for a minute and just read the report as a human being. How does it strike you? Anyone else?

(Also see here: http://news.baou.com/main.php?action=recent&rid=20383 )

Doesnt seem too far fetched, remeber a historical blip in the American Air Force history, Hiroshima and Tagiioky, excuse the spelling but you know what I am talking abot, that was a pre-emptive strike to deter further attack from the Japanese. It seems that the nuclear boms used were not exactly needed, more like a test to see what the after effect of nuclear radiation would be on humans. I wouldn't be surprised if the Ari Force has a new bomb it wants to test. It concellation the towns and the people that experinced these horrifc attacks were able to rebuild their land to an impressive degree, and also progressed their philosophical social awareness, that war and the threat of it, is neither noble nor justified, and that the loss of one life is as great and meaning full as 10, 000, exibited in the suicide of the Japanese general, in respect for his decision to further withstand American infultration against his people. It seems that it is always America that is in need to defend human rights, yet it is always at the expense of others.

We should all perhaps consider this, "We are born, therefore we are alive, our existence is our gift and our ability to survive is our tool to which we maintain our presence, but must anyone have the ability or the perogative to jeopdise these fundamental rights?"

Regards

A.Christ
 
  • #89
American Economy sustained by international commerce

outsider said:
LOL :smile: ... these are all true... what about the glut of product? If we already have it, the need to buy a new one is a WANT and not a NEED. Theres plenty of old junk on ebay, swap meets, and garage sales... America will not tumble due to lack of consumer products... as long as we have agriculture, we can learn to adapt. Give us a reason to start from scratch and create jobs all over again? no? :cool:

It is of the educated opinion that Americas political structure can not sustain a collapse.

Hypothetically: If Europe, east Asia, and soon the other independent economic systems were to say to America **** You no more importing or exporting. Americans would be left in a situation where they would have to support themselves. It is fact that you debt is so high that if you were too loose roughly 40-60% of your business capacity, ie, that of international importing and exporting the economic situation, america would in reality have no money, therefore taxes would have to go up! If you know anything about the American economy you would realize that America isn't actually self-sufficient, if it were then, its Governments would not have to win debates through roadshows and pantomime promotion, in fact no government republic or democratic would win an election if it knew taxes had to be increased, therefore its entire political structure would fall to pieces, there would be no money to promote policies, finance campaigns across its states or support its people in economic distress. If America was as powerful and rich as it assumes, why is most of its national income spent on war fare, Because they are so scared of this happening that they would rather blow the world to pieces than admit defeat. If America is to support itself without external influence then it needs the money and infrastructure to do so. America does not have a welfare state, nor does it have the capacity to accommodate its population. This is already obvious seen in the Towns that are missed out by the campaign trail, forgotten because they are the reality of Americas situation. The towns that aren't campaigned in are decided on the fact that the people in it are not affected by the government, if the governments cease to exist, which would indefinitely happen if there was no money to substantiate their existence then the whole country would be plunged into the same situation, and believe it or not, the political knowledge of the American people in many peoples opinions is one of ignorance and delusion, not to mention the fact they all have guns, anyone with anything will end up either trying to secure and protect their own piece or want to take more from those who have more of it.

P.S i am not a fanaticist or an American hater but the sooner America realizes a world exist beyond their own and that people just like them, with the same born given rights as they have exist, and that ignoring that they exist or that when they do acknowledge them they fear their abilities, is almost a crime against humanity.

No harm or insult intended

Regards

A.Christ
 
  • #90
Quick note

Art said:
Funnily enough it has been tried and what's more it even worked. Ref the Provisional IRA.

The I.R.A. is politically disbanded and if anyone in N. Ireland was to so much as sneeze out of place the cease fire would be broken, America would therefore be obliged to put the Jerry Adams, and his band of merry men in the same category as Osama, Hussein, and all the other TERRORISTS they are suppressing and launching tactical strikes against. The provisionals in all their glory would in reality **** a brick, shown in the fact that they need to beat up kids on the streets of Belfast for drinking alcohol without permission. The I.R.A. and its associated fractions is no longer, forget about them or they will become symbols like Guy Fawkes. Remember him, the original plotter, in England they have a day where he is burnt at a stake, fireworks are released and people sing, shout, and rejoice his death and the monarchy.
 
  • #91
AntonioChrist said:
It is of the educated opinion that Americas political structure can not sustain a collapse.

Hypothetically: If Europe, east Asia, and soon the other independent economic systems were to say to America **** You no more importing or exporting. Americans would be left in a situation where they would have to support themselves. It is fact that you debt is so high that if you were too loose roughly 40-60% of your business capacity, ie, that of international importing and exporting the economic situation, america would in reality have no money, therefore taxes would have to go up! If you know anything about the American economy you would realize that America isn't actually self-sufficient, if it were then, its Governments would not have to win debates through roadshows and pantomime promotion, in fact no government republic or democratic would win an election if it knew taxes had to be increased, therefore its entire political structure would fall to pieces, there would be no money to promote policies, finance campaigns across its states or support its people in economic distress. If America was as powerful and rich as it assumes, why is most of its national income spent on war fare, Because they are so scared of this happening that they would rather blow the world to pieces than admit defeat. If America is to support itself without external influence then it needs the money and infrastructure to do so. America does not have a welfare state, nor does it have the capacity to accommodate its population. This is already obvious seen in the Towns that are missed out by the campaign trail, forgotten because they are the reality of Americas situation. The towns that aren't campaigned in are decided on the fact that the people in it are not affected by the government, if the governments cease to exist, which would indefinitely happen if there was no money to substantiate their existence then the whole country would be plunged into the same situation, and believe it or not, the political knowledge of the American people in many peoples opinions is one of ignorance and delusion, not to mention the fact they all have guns, anyone with anything will end up either trying to secure and protect their own piece or want to take more from those who have more of it.

P.S i am not a fanaticist or an American hater but the sooner America realizes a world exist beyond their own and that people just like them, with the same born given rights as they have exist, and that ignoring that they exist or that when they do acknowledge them they fear their abilities, is almost a crime against humanity.

No harm or insult intended

Regards

A.Christ
None taken... thank you for the explanation. From what you have just said, what type of education would be required?

smurf said:
Okay, if you find someone who's lived everyday at war, someone who hasn't ached for home when away fighting, someone who doesn't know that there's anything else to life... Well, get them laid for starts, that might open their eyes. Everyone can always learn new things.
getting laid is a funny response... i enjoyed that... but they probably been getting laid with their bunkmate or hostages already. There are no rules in a world of violence... :frown:

As for the everyone can always learn new things... I basically agree, but if you take the stereotypical "trailerpark" people for example, how easy of a task would that be? How do you prevent them from reverting back to previously learned behaviour? I'm envisioning "A Clockwork Orange"-Kubrick
 
  • #92
Skyhunter said:
Getting back on topic.

It will require a combination of military action and compassion. Let's face it, the terrorist's that are already hard core are not going to go through a change of conscience simply because we are more compassionate and understanding.

The best way to reduce the number of future terrorist is a more equitable distribution of the worlds resources. If people are fed and happy and see that others they care for are fed and happy, they are less likely to strap on a bomb and blow themselves up in a subway.

It will not be easy, but the idea that we can coax all the terrorists into Iraq and fight them there is just ludicrous.
someone give this man a nobel peace prize! ... they can have the money... give the people peace & happiness (everyone drives a vw) free internet too! :biggrin:
 
Last edited:
  • #93
outsider said:
someone give this man a nobel peace prize! ... they can have the money... give the people peace & happiness (everyone drives a vw) free internet too! :biggrin:
I can get them all into Iraq for a few minutes at least ... Announce a state visit by George W Bush. :biggrin:
 
  • #94
Skyhunter said:
The best way to reduce the number of future terrorist is a more equitable distribution of the worlds resources. If people are fed and happy and see that others they care for are fed and happy, they are less likely to strap on a bomb and blow themselves up in a subway.

It will not be easy, but the idea that we can coax all the terrorists into Iraq and fight them there is just ludicrous.
Base on what you said, US is trying to increase the number of future terrorist because they're always speaking about next wars they are going to start them. I don't know why but perhaps more terrorist attak could give them more opportunity and support to start another war. And more wars mean they can sell more weapons.
 
  • #95
outsider said:
someone give this man a nobel peace prize! ... they can have the money... give the people peace & happiness (everyone drives a vw) free internet too! :biggrin:
Yeah! Then in 20 years we have to come up with a real plan because we've destroyed the planet and the insurgency is now fighting for a few miles of clean land to grow food on.
 
  • #96
Lisa! said:
Base on what you said, US is trying to increase the number of future terrorist because they're always speaking about next wars they are going to start them. I don't know why but perhaps more terrorist attak could give them more opportunity and support to start another war. And more wars mean they can sell more weapons.
Oh yeah... how could we forget about americas thriving weapons industry?... peace would put them out of business... so, US is basically in the war business... hightech, germ, political, financial and literal
 
  • #97
Smurf said:
Yeah! Then in 20 years we have to come up with a real plan because we've destroyed the planet and the insurgency is now fighting for a few miles of clean land to grow food on.
science will advance agriculture to produce larger tastier crops faster by 10 years... so, no need for the insurgents :-p

no war means concentration of scientific community to solve environmental issues globally... all countries send a rep to an annual workshop hosted by Dr. David Suzuki to report progress and set new goals.
 
Last edited:
  • #98
Antonio Christ said:
This is already obvious seen in the Towns that are missed out by the campaign trail, forgotten because they are the reality of Americas situation. The towns that aren't campaigned in are decided on the fact that the people in it are not affected by the government, if the governments cease to exist, which would indefinitely happen if there was no money to substantiate their existence then the whole country would be plunged into the same situation, and believe it or not, the political knowledge of the American people in many peoples opinions is one of ignorance and delusion, not to mention the fact they all have guns, anyone with anything will end up either trying to secure and protect their own piece or want to take more from those who have more of it.

Just a quick note: The parts of the country that aren't campaigned in are usually skipped over because one party or candidate already has such a grip on that region that there is no way he will lose it (for instance, there was little to no campaigning in California and Massachusetts because Kerry was going to win those states either way; there was little to no campaigning in Texas and Oklahoma because Bush was going to win those states either way). It isn't that if the government were to cease to exist, the rest of the country would join the reality that these towns are already in and that people with ignorant guns will start pillaging and whatever else that terrible run-on was trying to say.
 
  • #99
outsider said:
science will advance agriculture to produce larger tastier crops faster by 10 years... so, no need for the insurgents :-p
In that case they're fighting for the right to eat food that's not been chemically and genetically altered by American corporations. Same deal, just different business.
no war means concentration of scientific community to solve environmental issues globally... all countries send a rep to an annual workshop hosted by Dr. David Suzuki to report progress and set new goals.
David Suzuki would never support the production of another 3-4 billion or so vehicles. He also wouldn't support you're so called advanced agriculture, as he as expressed, like any smart person, a sever distrust for the genetic and chemical engineering of nature.
 
  • #100
Smurf said:
In that case they're fighting for the right to eat food that's not been chemically and genetically altered by American corporations. Same deal, just different business.

People would fight not to eat larger, tastier crops that grow faster and use up less land?

David Suzuki would never support the production of another 3-4 billion or so vehicles. He also wouldn't support you're so called advanced agriculture, as he as expressed, like any smart person, a sever distrust for the genetic and chemical engineering of nature.

Is there a crop in use today that hasn't been genetically altered? Or is he only opposed to splicing and would rather wait several generations to insert new genes through cross-breeding?
 

Similar threads

Back
Top