Complex analysis - electron screening

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the evaluation of a specific integral from Fetter's "Quantum Theory of Many Particle Systems," particularly focusing on the definition of logarithmic branch cuts and the choice of integral contour in complex analysis.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks clarification on the definition of logarithmic branch cuts, suggesting they are defined as regions at fixed logarithmic arguments.
  • Another participant mentions the use of Cauchy's Theorem and describes the contour chosen for the integral, indicating it involves a semi-circle in the upper half-plane and slitting along the cuts.
  • A later reply proposes a relationship involving the integral and the residues at poles, questioning whether this aligns with the Jordan lemma.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion contains multiple viewpoints regarding the definition of branch cuts and the evaluation of the integral, with no consensus reached on the correctness of the proposed relationships or methods.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the choice of contour and the implications of the branch cuts, indicating that these aspects may depend on specific definitions and assumptions not fully resolved in the discussion.

kknull
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Hi!
I have to understand how this integral is evaluated (it is taken from Fetter - Quantum theory of many particle systems)(14.24):

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/158338/fis/fetter.pdf"

in particular, i don't know how the log brach cuts are defined..
as far as I know, log branch cuts can be define as the regions at fixed log argument.. (i.e. -inf to 0 for [-pi;pi[).
Gnuplot says that the "natural" branch cut ([-pi;pi[) is the discontiunous line in this pic:

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/158338/fis/arg-rminus.png"

ideas?
thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
sorry, the right pdf link is http://dl.dropbox.com/u/158338/fis/fetter2.pdf"

also, I can't understand how the integral contour is chosen.

thanks :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
kknull said:
sorry, the right pdf link is http://dl.dropbox.com/u/158338/fis/fetter2.pdf"

also, I can't understand how the integral contour is chosen.

thanks :)

I had a quick look. The log branch cuts are obviously taken directly upwards (as in the figure). They are using Cauchy's Theorem applied to a contour which goes from -infinity to +infinity along the real axis (the original contour for the integral), plus a semi-circle into the upper half plane. However, since you can't really pass through the cuts, you have to slit the semi-circle along the cuts.

By Cauchy's Theorem, that is equal to the residue at the pole along the imaginary axis.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ok,
so is it a sort of jordan lemma? the integral along the semi circle is not 0, but it's the integral along C1 and C2.
In other words:

integral + C1 + C2 = residue of the pole
integral = residue of the pole - C1 - C2

is it correct?

thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K