Complex Analysis: Solutions on the Line Re(z)=1/2

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the equation (z-1)^23 = z^23, with a focus on demonstrating that all solutions lie on the line Re(z)=1/2. Participants explore the implications of this equation in the context of complex analysis.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss converting the equation into polar and exponential forms, with some expressing uncertainty about how to proceed with the first term after conversion. Others suggest rearranging the equation to simplify the analysis and question the implications of certain steps taken.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of different methods to manipulate the equation, with some participants offering insights that have helped others progress in their understanding. However, there is no explicit consensus on the approach or the final interpretation of the solutions.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note confusion regarding prerequisites for complex analysis and the implications of certain algebraic manipulations, particularly concerning the potential for undefined expressions in the context of the problem.

Brendy
Messages
37
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider the equation
(z-1)^23 = z^23

Show that all solutions lie on the line Re(z)=1/2
How many solutions are there


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Really have no idea. I figured polar form might be helpful somehow so I converted it and got
(r(cos (theta) + isin (theta)) - 1)^23 - r^23(cos (23*theta) + isin (23*theta))=0
I'm getting hung up on the first term. I'm not really sure what I can do with it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It would probably be better to begin with to write the equation in exponential notation and notice that [itex]-1 = \exp\{i\pi\}[/itex].
 
Alright, I've got
(r23ei[itex]\theta[/itex]-ei[itex]\pi[/itex])23-r23e23i[itex]\theta[/itex]

I don't recall any way to combine the two exponents. Expanding those brackets are going to be a mess, I think, and probably unnecessary since I'm not trying to find the solutions exactly.
 
Last edited:
It would make more sense if you had an equal sign in there!
 
It would, wouldn't it! That equation should have an =0 at the end. My apologies.
 
How about you just muscle-through it with z's first:

[tex]\frac{z-1}{z}=1^{1/23}[/tex]

Brave huh?

[tex]z=\frac{1}{1-e^{2n\pi i/23}}[/tex]

Now, even though it's messy, can't you now convert everything to sines and cosines, rationalize the denominator, and just split-out the real part of that and hopefully, it'll be 1/2?

Hope that's not too much help guys.
 
Thanks, jackmell. I didn't think of doing that. Once I did, the rest of the problem proved to be simple.
 
jackmell could you explain that step just a bit more?

did you just rearrange so that we had unity on the right side of the equation, and then take the 23rd root of all the values?

not quite sure how you got to the next step either?
maybe brandy can explain?

man I'm bad at complex analysis!
 
That's exactly what he did. It's a nice way to eliminate that annoying exponent that I didn't think of until I saw him do it.

The next part is just rearranging what he had to get it in the form z=

It isn't an easy subject. Unfortunately, the prerequisite subject for complex analysis at my uni didn't cover the assumed knowledge so I've got a bit of catching up to do.
 
  • #10
Just thought a bit more on that solution... Isn't it undefined everywhere since e2in[itex]\pi[/itex]=1 and therefore the denominator is 0?
 
  • #11
Ok, lemme' see if I can get out of this jam . . .

We started with [tex](z-1)^{23}=z^{23}[/tex]

Ok, if you expanded that out, you'd get not a 23rd degree polynomial but a 22 degree polynomial right since you'd remove z^23. Ok, so that's 22 solutions.

Now, during the algebra, we got to:

[tex]1-1^{23}=1/z[/tex]

Usually, we then just take the reciprocal but actually we're dividing by 1-1^23 in one step then multiplying by z in the next. When we divide by 1-1^23, we're assuming that's not zero. And 1-1^23 is zero only when the argument is zero right? Because:

[tex]1^{23}=e^{i/23(\theta+2n\pi)}[/tex]

and only one of those roots is one and that's when theta=0. So there we go, that's 22.
 
  • #12
Ah, thanks guys. I confused myself with the exponential for a bit.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K