Complex fraction as a ratio of sines?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter de1irious
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex Fraction Ratio
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the possibility of expressing a complex fraction as a ratio of sines, specifically focusing on the expression \(\frac{1-e^{101z}}{1-e^{z}}\). Participants explore the implications of using sine and hyperbolic sine functions in this context, as well as related questions about expressing complex fractions in terms of real and imaginary components.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about rewriting the complex fraction as a ratio of two sines.
  • Another participant suggests that while it is possible, the arguments of the sines will involve complex numbers.
  • A different participant proposes using hyperbolic sine but admits to limited knowledge about hyperbolic trigonometric functions.
  • Further discussion includes rewriting the expressions for \(1-e^{z}\) and \(1-e^{101z}\) in terms of sine functions, leading to a ratio involving hyperbolic sine.
  • One participant expresses skepticism about the validity of the proposed method, noting discrepancies when using a calculator and the need to factor out the real part.
  • Another participant acknowledges the confusion regarding the sine function's definition and corrects themselves by emphasizing the use of hyperbolic sine instead.
  • A related question is raised about expressing the complex fraction as a linear equation of real and imaginary parts, prompting a discussion about rationalizing denominators and the nature of complex fractions.
  • One participant seeks clarification on the concept of complex conjugates in relation to the denominator of the fraction.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the methods for rewriting the complex fraction, with some advocating for hyperbolic sine while others question the validity of the approaches discussed. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best method to express the fraction as a ratio of sines or in terms of real and imaginary components.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions made about the definitions of sine and hyperbolic sine, as well as the specific forms of the complex fraction being discussed. The discussion also highlights the potential for confusion when transitioning between different mathematical representations.

de1irious
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Is it possible for me to write this complex fraction as a ratio of two sines? Thanks.

[tex]\frac{1-e^{101z}}{1-e^{z}}[/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is possible, but the arguments of the sines will be complex numbers.
 
I think you could use hyperbolic sine but I don't know much about hyperbolic trig f(x)s yet
 
That's fine, Mathman. If we allow sin to be evaluated at complex numbers, using the standard definition of sin(z) in terms of the exponential, how do we we rewrite it? Thanks
 
1-ez=ez/2(e-z/2-ez/2)
=-2ez/2sin(z/2)
Similar expression for 1-e101z. Then take ratio.
 
I don't think that works though because sin(z) puts the exponent of e as iz and -iz, not z. For instance, if I plug that into a calculator, it doesn't come out equal. I am trying to factor out the real part, but the ratio will not cancel to the point that I have just sines.
 
Nvm, I just realized you were talking about hyperbolic sines. Thanks for the tip!

EDIT: However, now I get e[tex]^{50z}[/tex][tex]\frac{sinh101z/2}{sinhz/2}[/tex]

Any way to simplify the exponent out front?
 
Last edited:
de1irious said:
I don't think that works though because sin(z) puts the exponent of e as iz and -iz, not z. For instance, if I plug that into a calculator, it doesn't come out equal. I am trying to factor out the real part, but the ratio will not cancel to the point that I have just sines.

Sorry, my bad. I forgot to put the i factor in for the sin. Using sinh is better.
 
A related question I have is can we express the complex fraction as a linear equation of Re()+Im()?
 
  • #10
orstats said:
A related question I have is can we express the complex fraction as a linear equation of Re()+Im()?
That's pretty standard isn't it? You "rationalize" the denominator by mutltiplying both numerator and denominator by the complex conjugate of the denominator. Exactly what the computations are depends on the particular complex fraction. Do you mean "complex fraction" in the sens "fraction with complex numbers" or "fraction with fractions in the numerator and denominator"?

Can you give an example of what you had in mind?
 
  • #11
I am not sure what the complex conjugate would be for the denominator...

sin(az)
______
sin(bz)

=

exp(iaz) - exp(-iaz)
________________
exp(ibz) - exp(-ibz)

=?

Re() + Im()
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 139 ·
5
Replies
139
Views
12K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K