Complex, holomorphic and integration

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the integration of a rational function, specifically focusing on the function f(z) = (z - 2)/(z^2 + 1). Participants explore the holomorphic nature of the function and the application of the Cauchy-Riemann equations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need to express the function in terms of real and imaginary parts to verify holomorphic properties. There are attempts to apply the Cauchy-Riemann equations, with some expressing frustration over the results. Others suggest methods for simplifying the expressions to satisfy the equations. The integration process is also examined, with various approaches being attempted.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on addressing the Cauchy-Riemann equations and simplifying complex expressions. There is acknowledgment of the challenges faced in differentiating the function and ensuring the realness of the components. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored, particularly regarding the definition of elementary functions and the validity of the integration results.

Contextual Notes

Participants question the definitions and assumptions related to elementary functions and the conditions under which the function is differentiable. There is mention of using software tools for verification, which introduces additional complexity to the discussion.

Potage11
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
1.Represent the following rational functions as sums of elementary fractions and find the primitive functions (indefinite integrals);
(a) f(z)= z-2/z^2 +1


2.Now, I am pretty sure that I have to split up this equation into real and imaginary parts in order to show that it is holomorphic. Once I have show that, I can use that fact to find a g'(z)=f(z)


3. The Attempt at a Solution :

So I tried f(z)=f(x+iy)= x+iy-2/(x+iy)^2 +1
u= x-2/(x+iy)^2 +1 and v= y/(x+iy)^2 +1

but by Cauchy-Reimann I am not getting du/dx=dv/dy, even though I know I should.
du/dx= -x^2 -y^2 +4x+1+4iy and
dv/dy= x^2 + y^2 +1

so I got frustrated, and attempted to do the integral anyways, first by substitution, then by parts;
This is my best attempt so far:

Int[z/z^2+1] + Int[-2/z^2+1]
Int[z/z^2+1]=1/2ln|z^2+1|
Int[-2/z^2+1]= Int[-2/(z+i)(z-i)]
I don't feel like listing everything, but by partial fractions:
Int[-2/z^2+1]= Int[i/z-i] + Int[-i/z-i]= iln(z-i) - iln(z+i)

Final answer: 1/2ln|z^2+1|+ iln(z-i) - iln(z+i) +c

I would like to know if my answer makes even remote sense, and if you guys can figure out why my cauchy-reimann equation isn't working, that would be awesome too.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your integral looks reasonable. The reason Cauchy-Riemann isn't working is that if you are writing f(x+iy)=u(x,y)+v(x,y)*i, u and v should be real functions. You haven't gotten rid of all of the i's in them.
 
i'm not sure what constitutes a elementary function (i always thought rational functions were elementary!).

But the reason your not getting the cauchy reimann equations satisfied, well look at how you split up u(x,y) and v(x,y)

u= x-2/(x+iy)^2 +1 and v= y/(x+iy)^2 +1

Notice something wrong? Remember that the C-R equations work when u and v are of the form f(x,y)=u(x,y)+iv(x,y), where u and v are REAL functions of two variables. Your u and v above have complex numbers in them!

Where is the function:

g(z) = 1/2ln|z^2+1|+ iln(z-i) - iln(z+i) +c

differentiable? We know that wherever it IS differentiable, it's derivative is your original function - but the problem is asking for the subset of the plane under which this is true.
 
Thanks Dick, that's such a morale boost!

So I'm trying to remove the i's:
I multiplied out x+iy-2/x^2 - y^2 + 2ixy +1
I'm pretty sure I can't do u=x-2/x^2 - y^2 +1 and v=y/2xy
I am honestly out of ideas :(
 
If you have a fraction like c/(a+bi), to make the denominator real, multiply top and bottom by (a-bi). That will put all of the i's in the numerator where you can collect them.
 
Just for fun, Maple gave me 2/z+ln(z)+z for that integral.
How it got there, I have no idea, but it looks much cleaner :)
 
omg, I can't believe I forgot the conjugate... thanks again
 
Ok, so that took forever, but it pretty much worked, thanks for the help guys!
 
Potage11 said:
Just for fun, Maple gave me 2/z+ln(z)+z for that integral.
How it got there, I have no idea, but it looks much cleaner :)

If you differentiate that, do you get what you started with? I don't think so. I think you typed something wrong into Maple.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K