1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Complex power raised over real number.

  1. Aug 22, 2012 #1
    1. I actually dont know if such kind of operation is even allowed.

    A friend of mine raised this question, that can we raise a complex power over a real number. I solved it this way. Is this correct?

    http://i45.tinypic.com/254vwux.jpg
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data



    2. Relevant equations



    3. The attempt at a solution
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 22, 2012
  2. jcsd
  3. Aug 22, 2012 #2

    SammyS

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Yes, that's fine.
     
  4. Aug 22, 2012 #3
    Yes, you did it correctly. I am not quite sure approximating the transcandental functions with decimals, but I suppose that's fine.
     
  5. Aug 22, 2012 #4

    Ray Vickson

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Your method is OK, but if you plan to use the results in further numerical computations, you should keep more digits of accuracy; nowadays, in this computer age, there is no barrier to retaining more digits. For example, it might be better (depending on future uses) to write
    [tex]3^{5i} = e^{i 5 \ln 3 } = \cos(5 \ln 3) + i \sin(5 \ln 3) \doteq
    0.7037573 - 0.7104404 i\, . [/tex]

    RGV
     
  6. Aug 22, 2012 #5
    Yeah this is obviously much better, I was just looking whether it is even possible or not as none of the books I use has such question.
    Would be awesome if you could suggest some good book for complex number (pre collage).
     
  7. Aug 23, 2012 #6

    Bacle2

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Are you also taking into account that there are infinitely-many solutions depending

    on your choice of branch/argument?
     
  8. Aug 24, 2012 #7
    well thats obvious, isnt it? trigo fn is periodic, i just stayed in principle branch
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook