Complex Sin value greater than 1

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the properties of the sine and cosine functions when dealing with complex arguments. Specifically, the participants analyze the scenario where Sin(theta) = 3.08 and Cos(theta) = -i*2.91. It is established that while the sine function is traditionally bounded between -1 and 1 for real arguments, it can exceed these bounds when extended to complex numbers. The relationship between sine and cosine for complex arguments is clarified, revealing that both Sin(theta) and Cos(theta) can yield complex values, and the equation sin^2(theta) + cos^2(theta) = 1 still holds true in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex numbers and their properties
  • Familiarity with Euler's formula and its applications
  • Knowledge of trigonometric identities involving complex arguments
  • Basic understanding of hyperbolic functions and their relation to trigonometric functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and implications of Euler's formula, e^(ix) = cos(x) + i*sin(x)
  • Explore the properties of hyperbolic functions, particularly sinh and cosh
  • Learn about the behavior of trigonometric functions with complex arguments
  • Investigate the implications of complex rotations in the context of trigonometric identities
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students studying complex analysis or advanced trigonometry, particularly those interested in the behavior of trigonometric functions in the complex plane.

tim9000
Messages
866
Reaction score
17
Hi,
My Complex Euler stuff is a bit rusty but I'm working on a problem (that I won't mention here) but I'm after an explanation as to how:

Sin (theta) = 3.08 and so
Cos (theta) = -i*2.91


What's throwing me is that I know Sin can only have a max at 1 trigonometrically (obviously) so I'm assuming 3 is something to do with like 3 rotations, but I could be wrong. I was also thinking like the 0.08 would be 4.6 degrees for theta. And I tried rearranging e^i*theata = CiS as
e^i*theta - sin (theta) = -i*cos(theta) but that doesn't help.

Any explanations?

Thanks a lot!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure what you're asking. There is no theta such that sin(theta) = 3.08 (to my knowledge) and it is completely wrong to say that -i*2.91 is "less than" 1.
 
Cosx=(Exp(ix)+Exp(-ix))/2

Cos(ix)=(Exp(-x)+Exp(x))/2

The cosine function will never give you a complex number.
 
HomogenousCow said:
Cosx=(Exp(ix)+Exp(-ix))/2

Cos(ix)=(Exp(-x)+Exp(x))/2

The cosine function will never give you a complex number.

He is talking about complex arguments. I think we can all agree that cos(5i + 2) is complex.
 
Right yes, forgot about the general a+bi case
 
We can say that:
For real a:
sin(a) is in [-1,1]

For imaginary x:
sin(bi) is imaginary, and so there is no well defined notion of a less than or greater than comparison to real numbers.

For complex a + bi (that are not one of the above cases)
sin(a + bi) is complex, and so there is no well defined notion of a less than or greater than comparison to real numbers.

In any case, sin(x) is never greater than 1.
 
^not quite
sin(a+b i)
is zero when a,b=0
real when b or cos(a)=0
cos(a)=0
imaginary when sin(a)=0and complex otherwise

|e^(i theta)|=1
only holds for theta real
if theta is complex it does not hold
sin(theta)^2+cos(theta)^2=1
still holds but complex squares can be negative

if
Sin (theta) = 3.08 and so
Cos (theta) = -i*2.91
theta=(2n+1)pi/2+i*arccosh(3.08)
where n is any (rational) integer
this ignores round off 3.08^2-2.91^2=1.0183
when it should be 1
 
lurflurf said:
^not quite
sin(a+b i)
is zero when a,b=0
real when b or cos(a)=0
cos(a)=0
imaginary when sin(a)=0


and complex otherwise

|e^(i theta)|=1
only holds for theta real
if theta is complex it does not hold
sin(theta)^2+cos(theta)^2=1
still holds but complex squares can be negative

if
Sin (theta) = 3.08 and so
Cos (theta) = -i*2.91
theta=(2n+1)pi/2+i*arccosh(3.08)
where n is any (rational) integer
this ignores round off 3.08^2-2.91^2=1.0183
when it should be 1

Oh, OK. Sorry for the misinformation then.
 
Thanks for the great replies everyone, I'm going to have another read through them again but the general sense I'm getting is that the theata can't be broken up so that the amplitude of sin is less than 1. This leads me to think that I'm going to have to treat Sin(theta) and Cos(theta) as variables completely.

lurflurf, I should have specified that I'm not trying to find theta necessarily, more to deduce how we got to the Cos value. (But out of pure interest, what relation did you use to show theta=(2n+1)pi/2+i*arccosh(3.08)?)
I tried the trig relation you reminded me of and rearranged for Cos but it didn't make much sense:
sin^2 (theta) + cos^2 (theta) = 1 then
cos(theta) = SQRT(1 - sin^2(theta)) = i*2.913 Which is correct but positive though.
Thanks,
P.S
Surprisingly I'm just not seeing how:
Cosx=(Exp(ix)+Exp(-ix))/2
And
Cos(ix)=(Exp(-x)+Exp(x))/2

Can get me from Sin (theta) = 3.08 to Cos (theta) = -i*2.91...

Is there any significance of it being greater than 1, like the rotations or something like I thought, or just some mathematical freakery?
 
  • #10
sin^2 (theta) + cos^2 (theta) = 1
holds when theta is complex
the thing about sin(theta)<=1 follows from that and the assumption that sin(theta) and cos(theta) are real
Sin (theta) = 3.08 tells us
cos^2 (theta)=1-sin^2 (theta)=-8.8464
you said Cos (theta) = -i*2.91
Cos (theta) = i*2.91
is also possible when sin(theta)=3.08
if Cos (theta) = i*2.91
theta=-(2n+1)pi/2+i*arccosh(3.08)
where n is any (rational) integer
knowing sin(theta) or cos(theta) allows us to find the other up to sign
anyway
sin(a+bi)=sin(a)cosh(b)+i*cos(a)sinh(b)
because
sin(a+bi)=sin(a)cos(i*b)+cos(a)sin(i*b)
and
cos(i*b)=cosh(b)
sin(i*b)=i*sinh(b)
 
  • #11
Oh I see.
But so you're saying Cos (theta) = -i*2.91 was wrong, in that it should have been positive in the first place?

Thanks!
 
  • #12
No
cos (theta) = -i*2.91
cos (theta) = i*2.91
are both possible given
sin(theta)=3.08
we cannot know which value we have without more information
 
  • #13
Ooh, right. Cheers
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K